What is wrong with white nationalism?

PhysicalRemoval said:

And yet people still want to blame whitey for the voting habits of the majority.

S.A might follow, if their is a coup it might stave it off, then again if civil/race war does happen it is important to understand the following.

All one side has to do is blow up the water pipes and wait 5 days.

All of this assumes that India or China do not try for a land grab which they might in force or by proxy.

It will be hard for leftists to stay the course of their self hate driven suicide cult when they see people like them being "necklaced" in the streets of the"Utopia" they dream of.

Click to expand...

Good points all. 'SUICIDE CULT" a writer I forget who it was had another name for those types leftwing cultists 'ethnomasochists'

Tigerace117 said:

Nazi Germany is case in point of white supremacy failing miserably. South Africa and Rhodesia not only directly aided in the spread of communism, but they destroyed their countries and left them a wreck.

And no, I think it's safe to say nobody would willingly bring Apartheid back in South Africa.

Click to expand...

I think I found a new favorite country in which your views would fit right in,
they took extraordinary means to avoid white supremacy!

Paraguay------

Ethnically, culturally, and socially, Paraguay has one of the most homogeneous populations in South America.
Because of José Gaspar Rodríguez de Francia's 1814 policy that no white Spaniards and Europeans could intermarry
among themselves (they could only marry blacks, mulattoes, mestizos or the native Guaraní), a measure taken to
avoid white supremacy being established in Paraguay (De Francia believed that all men were equal as well), it was
within little more than one generation that most of the population were of mixed racial origin.


http:/en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/white_Latin_Americans

slick said:

I think I found a new favorite country in which your views would fit right in,
they took extraordinary means to avoid white supremacy!

Paraguay------

Ethnically, culturally, and socially, Paraguay has one of the most homogeneous populations in South America.
Because of José Gaspar Rodríguez de Francia's 1814 policy that no white Spaniards and Europeans could intermarry
among themselves (they could only marry blacks, mulattoes, mestizos or the native Guaraní), a measure taken to
avoid white supremacy being established in Paraguay (De Francia believed that all men were equal as well), it was
within little more than one generation that most of the population were of mixed racial origin.


http:/en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/white_Latin_Americans

Click to expand...

Yes, all men are equal. De Francia was correct in that respect.

Not only that, but Paraguay ended up being the Prussia of South America, holding off Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay simultaneously for a time.

Meanwhile your white supremacist heroes only succeeded in wrecking their own countries and murdering millions of innocent people.

slick said:

(De Francia believed that all men were equal as well), it was
within little more than one generation that most of the population were of mixed racial origin.

Click to expand...

Perfect solution for racist USA, UK, Canada, Australia, ... .

PhysicalRemoval said:

Quote Originally Posted by slick View Post

The words of the the legendary statesman congressman from Colorado William Vaile of Colorado should not be forgotten when
he spoke before congress as the champion of the Immigration Act of 1924:

'Let me emphasize here that the restrictionists of Congress do not claim that the “Nordic” race, or even the Anglo-Saxon race, is the
best race in the world. … What we do claim is that the northern European, and particularly Anglo-Saxons made this country. Oh, yes;
the others helped. But that is the full statement of the case. They came to this country because it was already made as an Anglo-Saxon
commonwealth. They added to it, they often enriched it, but they did not make it, and they have not yet greatly changed it. We are determined
that they shall not. It is a good country. It suits us. And what we assert is that we are not going to surrender it to somebody else or allow other
people, no matter what their merits, to make it something different. If there is any changing to be done, we will do it ourselves.
(Cong. Rec., April 8, 1924, 5922)

Click to expand...

This betrays a woeful ignorance of history and culture. What is this "Anglo-Saxon culture" that he talks about? Does he not know that the Angles and Saxons were at each other's throats for centuries? And that's not to mention all the other immigrants, invaders and conquerors, inter-marriages, etc... that led to the hodge podge that we today think is some unchanging, monolithic "Anglo-Saxon culture": you had Celts, Gauls, and then the Norman and Viking invasions, you had the Romans who were invaders and settled there for centuries. If you just follow the royal familites in England you will see intermarriages with the Dutch, Belgians, Russians, Austrians and Germans, Spanish, the French, even Italians, etc, etc... not to mention all the other languages, tribes, and ethnic groups on the British Isles: the Irish, the Scots, the Welsh, etc...

The sheer variety of ethnic and tribal mixing on the British Isles is dizzying. And the amount of warfare, conflict, and bloodshed between them is dizzying.

And now this guy thinks that there has been one single, pure, pristine Anglo Saxon culture which, after all these millennia, is just NOW under threat by new tribes and ethnic groups to "make it something different"? LOL.

These people just need better education.