• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

David Brock secretly paid $200,000 to bring forward Trump accusers in 2016

David Brock is such a POS, political hatchet man. King of the bots. It's kind of funny that Democrats are so pissed off about Russian bots when they hired a guy like David Brock to do the same thing.

If I have to agree with you apdst I think I have to check myself for fever today.
 
Winston said:
David Brock is such a POS, political hatchet man. King of the bots. It's kind of funny that Democrats are so pissed off about Russian bots when they hired a guy like David Brock to do the same thing.

If I have to agree with you apdst I think I have to check myself for fever today.
Click to expand...

So, how do you feel about President Trump's accussers being paid? Still think they're credible?
 
apdst said:
So, how do you feel about President Trump's accussers being paid? Still think they're credible?
Click to expand...

Meh, there's so many of them. When you add in that Trump admitted on tape that he sexually abuses women, you have an admission to the crime alleged. And... don't some of the accusations predate his campaign?
 
apdst said:
So, how do you feel about President Trump's accussers being paid? Still think they're credible?
Click to expand...
Nope.

I might despise Trump, but these women have no credibility whatsoever if they're being paid.

While I might be liberal, some of these sexual harassment claims reek of malice. That's the way I felt when Clinton was accused, and it's the way I feel with some of these women concerning Trump.

We've got to stop just "believing the women" simply because there are droves of accusers, and we're afraid of offending proponents of third wave feminism for maintaining skepticism.

Evidence should be produce as it was against Spacey, Weinstien, Moore, and O'Reilly before we go on condemning men.
 
Winston said:
David Brock is such a POS, political hatchet man. King of the bots. It's kind of funny that Democrats are so pissed off about Russian bots when they hired a guy like David Brock to do the same thing.

If I have to agree with you apdst I think I have to check myself for fever today.
Click to expand...

Ah, but David Brock is not a foreign government. Therein lies the difference.

He is a hatchet man for the Democrats, but it's not like the Republicans don't have any.
 
rocket88 said:
Ah, but David Brock is not a foreign government. Therein lies the difference.

He is a hatchet man for the Democrats, but it's not like the Republicans don't have any.
Click to expand...

Roger Stone is the slimiest of them all.

So, yeah it's a quagmire.
 
apdst said:
What a way to ring in the new year...lol

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/01...aid-200000-bring-forward-trump-accusers-2016/
Click to expand...

From your link:

“Another donor has reached out to me offering relocation/security for any woman coming forward. I’m trying to reach him,” Bloom texted the woman on Nov. 3, 2016. Later she added, “Call me I have good news.”…

They weren't paying the women. They were promising to keep them safe if they came out. Not the same thing in any way.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
 
roughdraft274 said:
From your link:

“Another donor has reached out to me offering relocation/security for any woman coming forward. I’m trying to reach him,” Bloom texted the woman on Nov. 3, 2016. Later she added, “Call me I have good news.”…

They weren't paying the women. They were promising to keep them safe if they came out. Not the same thing in any way.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

They offered them money. That's the long and the short of it. What were they going to do; put those women in witness protection?
 
apdst said:
They offered them money. That's the long and the short of it. What were they going to do; put those women in witness protection?
Click to expand...

Relocation and security, just like the article says. So amazingly dishonest.
 
apdst said:
So, how do you feel about President Trump's accussers being paid? Still think they're credible?
Click to expand...

Almost Zero evidence
Maybe 1 out of 20?
You don't believe the C grabbers own words?
His Vietnam sacrifice was not to get AIDS?
You voted for this low life?
 
apdst said:
And a paycheck, because relocating means quitting their jobs.
Click to expand...
Great so we agree. The mo.ey is only used to reimburse them for expenses that follow from coming forward. This isn't a case where they are advertising to women "come forward and well write you a check"

Non story is non story. Apdst is dishonest. Sky is blue.
 
apdst said:
What a way to ring in the new year...lol

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/01...aid-200000-bring-forward-trump-accusers-2016/
Click to expand...


In response to your as usual ill-researched post, I will re-post a reply of mine to a previous similar post:

"Nothing illegal was done. The $500K was returned. The $200K was kept by the non-profit group to pursue such cases. I can give you an example of spreading lies. Spreading a lie that $500K was offered to an accuser, represented by Gloria Allred, to fabricate a story of Trump sexually assaulting her:"

https://www.snopes.com/summer-zervos-paid-500000/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom