• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Justice Dept: Release of FBI agents’ texts was not authorized

code1211 said:
This is something that implicates, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and Andres McCabe in one sentence. They all deserve their own sentences in the Federal Pen.

FBI agent's anti-Trump text messages released to Congress - CNNPolitics
<snip>
Later in a text from August 15, 2016, Strzok tells Page:

"I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office" -- an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe -- "that there's no way he gets elected --

but I'm afraid we can't take that risk.

It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40 . . . . " Page does not appear to have responded, according to records reviewed by CNN.
<snip>
Click to expand...

You cannot draw your conclusions from the information in those texts... you would suck as an investigator.
 
KerouacJack said:
You cannot draw your conclusions from the information in those texts... you would suck as an investigator.
Click to expand...

I am not an investigator.

All I need do is draw a personal conclusion. You don't need to be an artist to draw this conclusion.

Our law enforcement agents are supposed to be impartially applying law to assure a fair and orderly society.

This jack weed's texts are his texts. The source of his texts is not doubted by anyone.

The two other jack weeds implicated in his texts have not stepped forward to deny that the cited discussion(s) occurred.

Together, the three jack weeds are shown to be discussing how to rig the election. This was not fabricated by Fusion GPS. It really happened in the real world.

With this in mind, it's really humorous that Strzok, Page and the Agency for which they work are charged to find who was conspiring to rig the election.

With respect, this is actual evidence. Actual evidence is that thing that the Special Counsel against Trump has not produced.

This is becoming high comedy. You need to watch this film:

 
code1211 said:
I am not an investigator.
Click to expand...

Exactly plz show in detail how those texts prove the three of them conspired to rig the election without adding in your own conjecture and misinterpretations..

I'll paypal you 100 if you can.
 
KerouacJack said:
Exactly plz show in detail how those texts prove the three of them conspired to rig the election without adding in your own conjecture and misinterpretations..

I'll paypal you 100 if you can.
Click to expand...

Don't you just hate it when someone edits your posts to change or eliminate the meaning?

Everything you asked for is included in that words you deleted.

Again, the only conclusion I need is my personal conclusion. That's what a personal conclusion is. That's all Muldoon and the Gang That Won't Shoot Straight have.

That's all they have.

I don't need more. They do.
 
code1211 said:
Don't you just hate it when someone edits your posts to change or eliminate the meaning?

Everything you asked for is included in that words you deleted.

Again, the only conclusion I need is my personal conclusion. That's what a personal conclusion is. That's all Muldoon and the Gang That Won't Shoot Straight have.

That's all they have.

I don't need more. They do.
Click to expand...

OK troll your opinion all you want.
 
Johnson said:
Ok, let me rephrase? The *current* investigators. I don't know what it is anyone would expect to happen other than what did happen. They did some things they shouldn't have, they got booted off the investigation. So based on the fact that Mueller has shown that he won't tolerate that sort of nonsense, doesn't it make the remaining investigation more legitimate?
Click to expand...

Johnson said:
Plus, them being reassigned doesn't actually prove that they couldn't put aside their beliefs and act professionally, does it?
Click to expand...

What does it show to you?
What did they do that they shouldn't have?
 
KerouacJack said:
OK troll your opinion all you want.
Click to expand...

You know a great way to support your belief of that something exists?

Link to the source that your rely upon.

If you think Trump is guilty of something, link to the section in the Criminal Code showing the violation that he committed and that is being investigated.
 
Last edited:
Mycroft said:
Since when has a leaker...whether that leaker is trying to help or hurt Trump...need to have "authorization"? Since when has that ever mattered.

Heck, when Obama's people leaked something to the media, nobody cared if it was authorized or not.
Click to expand...

And they didn't care when Obama went after the leakers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom