I'm not a republican, and I called him a scumbag before and more often than you did.
Did I say you were a republican? And, this isn't about me. It's about you. But for the record, I had not even been around here much, if at all, over the previous few weeks, so it wouldn't have taken much to call him a scumbag more than I did. That said, can you site some instances of you calling him a scumbag? Just curious.
As for me, let me just say up front that (politics aside) Alabama is actually a great place. I spent some time there in the past. But when it comes to public criticism and/or condemnation related to support for someone like Roy Moore, I find it odd that anyone could look at an election in which 48% of voters supported him.......and then ask for apologies. Make no mistake, 48% of the people in Alabama really DID prefer that child molester. Moore's 48% support on election night was EXACTLY where his pre-election poll numbers (of ALL registered Alabama voters) showed him to be. Doug Jones outperformed his pre-election poll numbers by about 5 points, as "undecideds" from the pre-election polls clearly tipped in his favor.
You realize the great purge of sexual abusers in our current society right now. 95% of them are far left democrats, you do know that right?
Interesting to see how you carefully frame your disingenuous arguments. Most resignations are Democrats. But most of the accusations are against republicans, not democrats. However most republicans simply deny it, attack their accusers, and stay on the job; while most democrats own up to it, apologize and resign. The fact that almost all of the "purging" is coming from a few prominent liberals or Democratic leaders........while the Republicans and conservatives accused of similar (or, in most cases, much worse) abuses are almost uniformly facing little-to-no pressure to resign or step aside from the fake "family values" conservatives and/or Republican party leaders.........is EXACTLY my point, not yours. Democrats resign. Republicans finish their terms and step aside, or just get re-elected. You do know that, don't you?
And you voted for a woman who set up a "war room" to attack her husbands rape victims. Just what high road do you fancy your ilk o.n?
I'll address the validity of the so-called "war room" argument below. But first.....let's just compare "Clinton War Room" (lead by wife of candidate) vs actual serial child molestation by a candidate himself . Geez :roll: Only wingnuts, I tell ya...only wingnuts. Rev, please explain to us the rationale behind this oft-repeated wingnut argument. The above is not even remotely akin to actually molesting 14 and 16 year old girls, as Roy Moore did. This is a pathetic argument from you and your ilk, "Rev".
Secondly.....You voted for a man who ADMITTED on tape to sexually assaulting women on a regular basis over a period of years............a man who has since been credibly accused, on the record, of sexual assault by at least 19 women.....a man whose own ex-wife swore under oath that he raped her and pulled out clumps of her hair in a fit of rage over a year after their divorce.........a man who has been sued for attempted rape by TWO different women, first in 1997 (which he settled out of court for an undisclosed sum of money), and then again a few years ago by a woman who claimed to have been 13 years old when assaulted. So let's make sure we are comparing apples to apples here, rather than apples to pairs, ok?
She set up a war room to attack her husband's victims. are you seriously going to say that's no big deal to you dependent class communists?
Ah, yes...the old, reliable "war room"/"bimbo patrol" excuse. What would any anti-Clinton rant be without this, huh? First, if you can find ANYONE (liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican) who EVER "defended" Bill Clinton's infidelity.........please let me know. Secondly, if you can find ANY example of Hillary Clinton "attacking" the women who accused Bill Clinton of assault.....please post the quote or the link. We know, for a fact, that Hillary "attacked" the women who had consensual affairs with her husband, but there is ZERO evidence of Hillary doing anything other than remaining silent after the assault accusations. She never "defended" Bill over the assault accusations, nor did she ever "attack" the women who accused Bill of assault.
Facts matter. Accuracy matters. Unless, of course, you are an ideologue, in which case nothing matters except that which affirms your existing biases.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/10/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-viciously-attack/
rof: