• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

USA Today: Trump as 'not fit to clean the toilets' in Obama's presidential library

A

ataraxia

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
48,311
Reaction score
25,566
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
USA Today has not been known to be a bastion of liberalism. It has not been known for controversial or partisan opinion pieces. But the editorial board there has recently written a searing op-ed against Trump, after he tweeted that senator Gillibrand had "begged him" for campaign contributions not long ago "and would do anything for them." After concerns were raised that this had very insulting sexual overtones, Whitehouse spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders tried to explain it away by saying that only anyone with "their mind in the gutter" could think that. What? You think the president of the United States could be that low class? But it seems she forgot she was talking about someone who was bragging about the size of his manhood on a nationally televised presidential debate. The USA Today editorial board, it seems, hasn't bought that explanation.

"With his latest tweet, clearly implying that a United States senator would trade sexual favors for campaign cash, President Trump has shown he is not fit for office. Rock bottom is no impediment for a president who can always find room for a new low...A president who would all but call Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand a whore is not fit to clean the toilets in the Barack Obama Presidential Library or to shine the shoes of George W. Bush. This isn't about the policy differences we have with all presidents or our disappointment in some of their decisions. Obama and Bush both failed in many ways. They broke promises and told untruths, but the basic decency of each man was never in doubt... A president who shows such disrespect for the truth, for ethics, for the basic duties of the job and for decency toward others fails at the very essence of what has always made America great...

This year, the choice isn't between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates -- Republican nominee Donald Trump -- is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency."
Will Trump's lows ever hit rock bottom?
Click to expand...

How low can you go? We are always surprised, aren't we?

TrumpLimboParty.jpg
 
Last edited:
Doing or giving anything does not mean sexual favors even in a relationship.

 
ataraxia said:
USA Today has not been known to be a bastion of liberalism. It has not been known for controversial or partisan opinion pieces. But the editorial board there has recently written a searing op-ed against Trump, after he tweeted that senator Gillibrand had "begged him" for campaign contributions not long ago "and would do anything for them." After concerns were raised that this had very insulting sexual overtones, Whitehouse spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders tried to explain it away by saying that only anyone with "their mind in the gutter" could think that. What? You think the president of the United States could be that low class? But it seems she forgot she was talking about someone who was bragging about the size of his manhood on a nationally televised presidential debate. The USA Today editorial board, it seems, hasn't bought that explanation.



How low can you go? We are always surprised, aren't we?

View attachment 67226050
Click to expand...
The only people who are insinuating that Trump meant anything sexual are the deviant liberals who who have dirty minds and filthy fetishes.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Doing or giving anything does not mean sexual favors even in a relationship.

Click to expand...


Ridiculous level of naiveté given the context of the character of the person who was saying this stuff. That argument may work for explaining this to a young child. Everyone else, including Sarah Huckabee Sanders, know exactly what he meant.
 
reinoe said:
The only people who are insinuating that Trump meant anything sexual are the deviant liberals who who have dirty minds and filthy fetishes.
Click to expand...

So if Trump was bragging about the size of his penis on an internationally televised presidential debate, that makes him a liberal?
 
ataraxia said:
So if Trump was bragging about the size of his penis on an internationally televised presidential debate, that makes him a liberal?
Click to expand...

That's completely unrelated to what I said. Holy jesus. Read what I said then read your response. Stop fantasizing about Trump's penis.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom