• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Warren suggests Gillibrand is a slut.

So, you fat shame a skinny person?

Actually yes.

it happens all the time. Someone that is actually healthy is being told.. "you know.. a moment on the hips equals a lifetime on the hips".

Especially with women. In the worst cases it leads to bulimia and anorexia and other eating disorders.
 
Actually yes.

it happens all the time. Someone that is actually healthy is being told.. "you know.. a moment on the hips equals a lifetime on the hips".

Especially with women. In the worst cases it leads to bulimia and anorexia and other eating disorders.

:lamo

Yeah, that's how it works.
 
Y'alls spin is epic. :lamo

Says the guy with the dumbest possible interpretation of her statement. Are you really so hatefully partisan you think this is what she was conveying, or are you just pretending to be?
 
So, you fat shame a skinny person?

Slut shaming is a nebulous term that is used in several different ways. A grown man learns a new use for the term, he doesn't get mad at the person who made him aware of the new use.
 
:lamo

Yeah, that's how it works.

yeah.. that's how it works.

No one likes to get called fat or be seen as doing "fat" behaviors.. particularly women.

So any woman.. whether currently fat or skinny is going to be shamed by being associated with those behaviors.
 
Well, this was really a waste of 2 minutes. (Open to interpretation:cool:.)
 
Says the guy with the dumbest possible interpretation of her statement. Are you really so hatefully partisan you think this is what she was conveying, or are you just pretending to be?

You might want to slow down saying that. :lamo
 
The moral high ground the democrats are trying to seize to drive this whole thing is a joke.

Force a few scumbags to retire just doesn't cut it, especially when you consider the corruption.

No, it's not just men in DC who suck.

Corrine Brown sentenced to 5 years in federal prison - Politico
https://www.politico.com/.../florida/.../corrine-brown-sentenced-to-five-years-in-feder...
Dec 4, 2017 - TALLAHASSEE — A federal judge in Jacksonville on Monday sentenced former DemocraticRep. Corrine Brown to five years in federal prison after she was convicted last May on corruption charges for her role in using a scam charity to bilk donors and use the money for personal expenses, the FloridaTimes-Union reported.

Stealing from a children's charity. That sucks.

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) Named One of the Most Corrupt Members ...
https://www.citizensforethics.org/.../maxine-waters-named-most-corrupt-member-of-c...
Washington, D.C. – In the midst of a national financial catastrophe, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) used her position as a senior member of Congress and member of the House Financial Services Committee to prevail upon Treasury officials to meet with OneUnited Bank. She never disclosed that her husband held stock in the ...

Maxine Waters isn't in any position to lecture on ethics
www.washingtonexaminer.com/maxine-waters-isnt-in-any-position-to.../2617991
Mar 21, 2017 - The longer a politician stays in Washington, as a rule of thumb, the more difficult it becomes to keep his nose clean. Democrats ought to apply that reasoning and skip over Maxine Waters if they're looking for a new conscience of the House. After three decades in Congress, the California Democrat has a ...

Rep. Waters charged on three counts | TheHill
thehill.com/.../house/113309-house-ethics-committee-charges-waters-on-three-counts
Aug 10, 2010 - The House ethics committee on Monday outlined its charges against Rep. Maxine Waters, who is accused of helping a bank in which her husband owned stock secure federal bailout funds. The committee charged the 10-term California Democrat with three counts of violating House rules and the federal ...

Maxine Waters: Democrats' Resistance Leader a Corrupt California ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../maxine-waters-democrats-resistance-leader-corrupt-califo...
Apr 26, 2017 - Maxine Waters is the Democratic party's new rock star? She's been in Congress for almost 40 years ...

Nancy Pelosi takes friendly fire from Seth Meyers over 'tone deaf ...

https://www.washingtontimes.com/.../nancy-pelosi-takes-friendly-fire-from-seth-meye...
Nov 28, 2017 - House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was hit with friendly political fire this week after comedian Seth Meyers found out about her reaction to sexual misconduct allegations against Rep. John Conyers.
Crony Capitalism: $737 Million Green Jobs Loan Given to Nancy ...

www.weeklystandard.com/crony-capitalism-737...jobs...nancy-pelosis.../594593
Sep 29, 2011 - Despite the growing Solyndra scandal, yesterday the Department of Energy approved $1 billion in new loans to green energy companies -- including a ... other than Ronald Pelosi, a San Francisco political insider and financial industry polymath who happens to be the brother-in-law of Nancy Pelosi, the ...
Photo contradicts Pelosi's statement about not meeting Kislyak - Politico

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/nancy-pelosi-sergey-kislyak-meeting-235653
Mar 3, 2017 - House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Friday that she's never met with the current Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak. "Not with this Russian ambassador, no," Pelosi told POLITICO's Jake Sherman and Anna Palmer during a Playbook interview, when asked whether she had ever met with ...


I think is must be the water (swamp water?) or the air in DC that takes normal ethical people and simply corrupts them. The longer they are there, the more they are exposed, the more corrupt they become.
 
True, but Gillibrand fits the title of hypocrite.

As shown when she took Bill & Hill's money and endorsements earlier this year, and now throws them under the bus, or is that disloyal? Or both?
 
As shown when she took Bill & Hill's money and endorsements earlier this year, and now throws them under the bus, or is that disloyal? Or both?

To be fair she has a perfectly predictable mercenary attitude. Billary just isn't that useful to her anymore.
 
To be fair she has a perfectly predictable mercenary attitude. Billary just isn't that useful to her anymore.

With friends like that . . . . .
 
True, but Gillibrand fits the title of hypocrite.

"Donald Trump is bad because he killed and ate a unicorn."

"No, that didn't happen."

"True but Trump is still bad!"
 
You can't slut shame a woman that isn't a slut. Just like you can't fat shame someone who isn't fat.

Ah. So beyond you not being able to read, you don't even understand the concept that is being discussed. Perhaps you shouldn't start threads on topics that you don't understand.
 
:lamo

Yeah, that's how it works.

Excellent. More evidence that you didn't understand the concept surrounding the thread you started.

Let me explain something to you apdst... not that I have any consideration that a partisan hack like you will listen or understand what I say, but slut-shaming is often done to women who are NOT sluts in any way shape or form. Here is a definition that fits perfectly:

Slut-shaming is the practice of criticizing women and girls who are perceived to violate expectations of behavior and appearance regarding issues related to sexuality. Examples are violating dress code policies by dressing in perceived sexually provocative ways, requesting access to birth control, having premarital, casual, or promiscuous sex, engaging in prostitution, or when being victim blamed for being raped or otherwise sexually assaulted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming

Now, as usual, your worthless and ignorant right wing hackery leads you to say really dumb and ignorant things. And, knowing just how dishonestly you post, there is no possible way that, with the evidence provided and your humilation complete, you will admit you were wrong and correct yourself. More likely you will either cowardly vacate the thread, further demonstrate your right wing hackery by remaining in denial, or further demonstrate your right wing ignorance by restating your error. Let's see which one you do.

Oh, and apdst, before you try some other type of dishonesty, notice the word that I placed in bold? That's called a QUALIFIER. So if you try to use the definition to dishonestly claim that slut-shaming can only be done to a prostitute or such, I have already demonstrated... as did the definition... that it is done to plenty of women who are not sluts at all.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom