• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whistleblower’s claim about Michael Flynn text is false

Glen Contrarian said:
Yeah...now all you have to explain away is his status as an agent for Turkey (supervised by the Turks, mind you), and his business dealings with the Russians...and those meetings with the Russians...and the list goes one....
Click to expand...

Which is irrelevant to the thread.
 
apdst said:
Another one bites the dust.

https://hotair.com/archives/2017/12/11/business-partner-claims-whistleblowers-claim-flynn-false/
Click to expand...

That's what happens when you have so and so telling the media that this other guy told him something or other...and then the media, thinking they FINALLY have the hot barrel of a smoking gun, shouts it out...and then all the OTHER media repeat the bogus crap...and then the useful idiots believe all of the media, after all...why would they lie, right?

Next thing you know, we find out so and so was just plain wrong, the media ends up looking like biased idiots, and the useful idiots...well, they just keep on being idiots.
 
apdst said:
Which is irrelevant to the thread.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I get it - you can't explain away all the other crap that Flynn did - that was way the heck WORSE than what he was wrongly accused of - so you dodge by trying to claim it's irrelevant.

But it is relevant since the reference you gave tried to make it seem as if the MSM was being SO unfair to Flynn, that it was all some kind of witch-hunt against him...so I pointed out the crap that he HAS done in order to show that it ain't a witch hunt, but a federal investigation with overwhelming probable cause.
 
Mycroft said:
That's what happens when you have so and so telling the media that this other guy told him something or other...and then the media, thinking they FINALLY have the hot barrel of a smoking gun, shouts it out...and then all the OTHER media repeat the bogus crap...and then the useful idiots believe all of the media, after all...why would they lie, right?

Next thing you know, we find out so and so was just plain wrong, the media ends up looking like biased idiots, and the useful idiots...well, they just keep on being idiots.
Click to expand...

I agree with Glen Greenwald: the media has such a hardon for President Trump, that they don't bother confirming anything.

Just like the Don jr. email story debacle; CNN claimed to have vetted the information via two sources. Both sources goofed on the same exact detail: the date the email was sent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom