• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Roy Moore accuser admits she wrote part of yearbook inscription

Does anyone notice that when an accuser of Moore has something that hurts a portion of their credibility.. Moore supporters are quick to say these hurts ALL accusers credibility?


But.. then when Moore stated he didn;t even KNOW these woman.. and they show proof through signatures etc... that doesn't seem to hurt Moore's credibility.
 
Given all these accusations and dastardly deeds Moore allegedly did, there isn't one police report? Or is there? Somewhere.
 
Maybe it's this:

"Moore, who went on to become a judge and then the chief justice of the Alabama State Supreme Court, later ruled against Nelson in a 1999 divorce case."

That might have a lot to do with it.
 
Ya but this can be nailed down, this is right in the wheel house of the so-called journalists, and I think someone did.

I will look into it when I have time.

How about reading her statement, where she said he reached over and locked it.

Could start with that.


"I tried to open my car door to leave, but he reached over and locked it so I could not get out.
I tried fighting him off, while yelling at him to stop, but instead of stopping he began squeezing my neck attempting to force my head onto his crotch."
 
A woman scorned

Moore DID NOT preside over her divorce case. This has been shown over and over, and you know it.

Is there some impenetrable wall around you that disallows actual facts to get in?
 
Moore DID NOT preside over her divorce case. This has been shown over and over, and you know it.

Is there some impenetrable wall around you that disallows actual facts to get in?

Link?
 
The
Divorce
filing
was
DISMISSED.

The couple reconciled shortly after the initial filing.

They were never divorced in 1999.

A clerk rubber stamped Moore's signature on a perfunctory dismissal record.

That's it.

He did not "rule against her" and she would have no reason to even go into the courtroom.

How many times does this have to be explained to you??
 
How about reading her statement, where she said he reached over and locked it.

Could start with that.


"I tried to open my car door to leave, but he reached over and locked it so I could not get out.
I tried fighting him off, while yelling at him to stop, but instead of stopping he began squeezing my neck attempting to force my head onto his crotch."

What manual passenger side door lock has ever been put on a car that makes it so the passenger is locked in?
 
How about reading her statement, where she said he reached over and locked it.

Could start with that.


"I tried to open my car door to leave, but he reached over and locked it so I could not get out.
I tried fighting him off, while yelling at him to stop, but instead of stopping he began squeezing my neck attempting to force my head onto his crotch."

She's probably lying. Afterall, she lied about the yearbook.
 

Oh! He has a link! :lamo

Nothing disputes what I said, crankypants.


Divorce
filing
was
DISMISSED.

The couple reconciled shortly after the initial filing.

They were never divorced in 1999.

A clerk rubber stamped Moore's signature on a perfunctory dismissal record.

That's it.

He did not "rule against her" and she would have no reason to even go into the courtroom.

How many times does this have to be explained to you??
 
What manual passenger side door lock has ever been put on a car that makes it so the passenger is locked in?

It happens in the Hollyweird movies all the time. Must be true. :)
 
The
Divorce
filing
was
DISMISSED.

The couple reconciled shortly after the initial filing.

They were never divorced in 1999.

A clerk rubber stamped Moore's signature on a perfunctory dismissal record.

That's it.

He did not "rule against her" and she would have no reason to even go into the courtroom.

How many times does this have to be explained to you??

That is correct and that is where she copied his signature from. That same document.
 
What manual passenger side door lock has ever been put on a car that makes it so the passenger is locked in?

That is what I asked when I saw that.

I know cars very well.

I can't think of any car from the '60s or the '70s that can be locked from the inside.

If he can lock it, she can unlock it.
 
Absolutely incorrigible. ^

Did you not understand what I posted?

Look at the yearbook signature and the document. It is the same.

So at least we know she signed that last part after 1999, right?
 
That is what I asked when I saw that.

I know cars very well.

I can't think of any car from the '60s or the '70s that can be locked from the inside.

If he can lock it, she can unlock it.

Sure and I am all for trying to take women seriously when they accuse men of misbehaving yet again so let's go check out her story.......but I think I know how this is going to go.
 
Back
Top Bottom