• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Great news for the patriots of this country. Closer and closer everyday.

Moderate Right said:
Even anti-Trumper Tapper said there was no direct evidence linking Trump or his campaign to colluding with the Russians to influence the election.
Click to expand...

When you say TRUMP - are you referring to the man as an individual or to the campaign which he headed?

Tapper did NOT dispute anything Schiff said. Not one fact that he listed was refuted nor challenged.

Go back and listen again - this time with an open mind.
 
Moderate Right said:
LOL!!! Thanks for giving me a big laugh. So, I am supposed to be informed by Rachel Maddow and not by Reuters. You guys really are too funny.
Click to expand...

The news is what will inform you. If you choose not to be informed, that's your business.
 
haymarket said:
Your own projecting is not debate. It is only your own projecting.

As for no evidence, I would urge you to watch this........ with an open mind and a removal of your red tinted partisan glasses.

Schiff: Evidence of Russian collusion damning - CNN Video

That is a very persuasive case of FACTS.
Click to expand...
The only reason anyone from the hate party would watch this is to create and find the lies needed to disqualify the video. Everyone here knows what the evidence is that supports this Russian/scum, bag connection. I would say he is 98% guilty, but I will wait for the other 2% points to go along with Muellers plan of getting all 100% for a slam dunk on scum bag.
 
haymarket said:
When you say TRUMP - are you referring to the man as an individual or to the campaign which he headed?

Tapper did NOT dispute anything Schiff said. Not one fact that he listed was refuted nor challenged.

Go back and listen again - this time with an open mind.
Click to expand...

There is evidence that Trump's campaign "colluded" with the Russians. There is no evidence that Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians to influence the election. This is what Tapper said.
 
jet57 said:
The news is what will inform you. If you choose not to be informed, that's your business.
Click to expand...

I'm still waiting for Reuters. I choose to be educated by Reuters, not by Rachel Maddow. You, on the other hand, would rather be educated by Rachel Maddow rather than by Reuters.
 
Moderate Right said:
There is evidence that Trump's campaign "colluded" with the Russians. There is no evidence that Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians to influence the election. This is what Tapper said.
Click to expand...

Tapper does not know if Trump himself colluded or not.
 
Moderate Right said:
Maddow reports nothing but partisan garbage. If your "evidence" is really unbiased, then you can find an unbiased source to present and I'll read. Otherwise, all we have is partisan garbage. But, I want to see evidence that Trump or his aides colluded with the Russians in order to influence the election. I don't want to see anything about them colluding with the Russians unless it is colluding to influence the election. So far there has been zero.
Click to expand...

Hillary”s Benghazi investigation turned into a fishing expedition examining her email. You can’t complain about expanding scope now.

Moreover, an investigation into Russian collusion would include any agreement or exchange between Trump and Russians.

For example, if Trump agreed to remove sanctions in exchange for a business deal that would be included. Are you saying that should be ignored?

Given that Flynn was making deals based on lifting sanctions and everyone was lying about it, I’m pretty sure we’ll find Trump was trying to make money not peace.

Trump is both a member of the elite and corrupt. The idea that he was going to clean up the swamp was always laughable.

You can remain in you cozy delusion for as long as you like but Trump’s days are numbered. He’s already reached the basement of popularity. When Mueller reveals the lies he’ll be toxic and Republicans will dump him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Moderate Right said:
But, for the one millionth time, it doesn't say one damn thing about Trump or his campaign colluding with the Russians to influence the election. Did I miss it? Where was it? I will give you an "E" for effort though in reading a legitimate news source instead of Rachel Maddow.
Click to expand...

The video and congresswomen Maxine Waters Do!

You can remain uninformed all you like.
 
SonOfDaedalus said:
Hillary”s Benghazi investigation turned into a fishing expedition examining her email. You can’t complain about expanding scope now.

Moreover, an investigation into Russian collusion would include any agreement or exchange between Trump and Russians.

For example, if Trump agreed to remove sanctions in exchange for a business deal that would be included. Are you saying that should be ignored?

Given that Flynn was making deals based on lifting sanctions and everyone was lying about it, I’m pretty sure we’ll find Trump was trying to make money not peace.

Trump is both a member of the elite and corrupt. The idea that he was going to clean up the swamp was always laughable.

You can remain in you cozy delusion for as long as you like but Trump’s days are numbered. He’s already reached the basement of popularity. When Mueller reveals the lies he’ll be toxic and Republicans will dump him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I'm saying that there is zero evidence that Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russians to influence the election. That's what you guys said from the get go and implied that his election was not legitimate due to this. Now you seem to be admitting that there is no evidence that Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russians in order to influence the election but that the investigation should be expanded to include other things. Why can't you just come out and admit that neither Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russians to influence the election and that he was lawfully elected? You have no proof otherwise and finally seem to admit it.
 
jet57 said:
The video and congresswomen Maxine Waters Do!

You can remain uninformed all you like.
Click to expand...

So, Mueller has no evidence that Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russians in order to influence the election but we should listen to Rachel Maddow and Maxine Waters?
 
Scum bag making any deals with Russia for a personal reason is Tyranny and exactly why he has been known for years as a scum bag. That includes sex deals, deals for profit any nasty bit of uglynss that Russia is holding over the head of scum bag, He is such a low life that it could be anything at all, and I mean anything, any hateful ugly scummy thing that man can do in this world, he is capable of everything evil that exist. He is scum. Do you people get it.
 
jet57 said:
The video and congresswomen Maxine Waters Do!

You can remain uninformed all you like.
Click to expand...
They have nothing they will charge at this time but they probably have a ton of information on it. Hell they are at the most only half way through the investigation , Nixon another right wing scum bag took 2 years.
 
jbander said:
Scum bag making any deals with Russia for a personal reason is Tyranny and exactly why he has been known for years as a scum bag. That includes sex deals, deals for profit any nasty bit of uglynss that Russia is holding over the head of scum bag, He is such a low life that it could be anything at all, and I mean anything, any hateful ugly scummy thing that man can do in this world, he is capable of everything evil that exist. He is scum. Do you people get it.
Click to expand...

Ummmmmmmmmmmm. Obama talked with the Russians and made deals. In fact, he took office wanting to talk to our enemies. Guess that makes him scum.
 
Moderate Right said:
So, Mueller has no evidence that Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russians in order to influence the election but we should listen to Rachel Maddow and Maxine Waters?
Click to expand...

Wrong again. As I said a couple of times now, you may remain uninformed.
 
jbander said:
They have nothing they will charge at this time but they probably have a ton of information on it. Hell they are at the most only half way through the investigation , Nixon another right wing scum bag took 2 years.
Click to expand...

Yeah, this is going to go on a while, the video tells why Muller wants Trump's financials.
 
jet57 said:
Wrong again. As I said a couple of times now, you may remain uninformed.
Click to expand...

And may you be filled with the biased left wing propaganda that Maddow and Maxine Waters spew. It is you who only wish to be informed by left wing hackery.
 
Moderate Right said:
And may you be filled with the biased left wing propaganda that Maddow and Maxine Waters spew. It is you who only wish to be informed by left wing hackery.
Click to expand...

(chuckle)

Not filled with any propaganda; filled with truth, because I'm informed.
 
jet57 said:
(chuckle)

Not filled with any propaganda; filled with truth, because I'm informed.
Click to expand...

Yeah. You are not informed, you are brainwashed by getting your news from Rachel Maddow and Maxine Waters. Sorry, but I can't help you.
 
jet57 said:
Yeah, this is going to go on a while, the video tells why Muller wants Trump's financials.
Click to expand...
Ya I looked at it, I wanted this done quick originally but now I realise what Mueller is doing , he will go up the ladder charging these criminals one after the other and making deals with all of them to get information to get scum bag with a slam dunk, and hopefully such a massive case against this scum bag to put him away. It will take time but that's fine, if jail comes out of it, I'm all for it.
 
Moderate Right said:
In other words, by the time the investigations are over it will be 2020 or 2024. What's the point?
Click to expand...

Well if this was Bi-Partisan congress or even Democratic, he would have been impeached multiple times. For those who don't know, impeach does not mean being removed but rather needs to answer for allegations and charges against him before the congress.

But with Republicans...you know, Trump can be ass banging your 5 year old daughter and republican/conservative will still go along with him and provide tissue to wide himself off, as longs they get their agenda pushed down the American People's throat!


So we either wait for the FBI to bring up charges against him, or Congress flips in 2020, but by then Congress doesn't need to Impeach Trump, because Trump like always packs and runs away, perhaps back to Mother Russia!

Until then just line up your daughter for him, because Trump sure like pedaphilias..and self admiting, he is one!

Diving Mullah
 
Diving Mullah said:
Well if this was Bi-Partisan congress or even Democratic, he would have been impeached multiple times. For those who don't know, impeach does not mean being removed but rather needs to answer for allegations and charges against him before the congress.

But with Republicans...you know, Trump can be ass banging your 5 year old daughter and republican/conservative will still go along with him and provide tissue to wide himself off, as longs they get their agenda pushed down the American People's throat!


So we either wait for the FBI to bring up charges against him, or Congress flips in 2020, but by then Congress doesn't need to Impeach Trump, because Trump like always packs and runs away, perhaps back to Mother Russia!

Until then just line up your daughter for him, because Trump sure like pedaphilias..and self admiting, he is one!

Diving Mullah
Click to expand...
Have you noticed how the right almost across the board are willing to support the sexual abuse of children'
 
Diving Mullah said:
Well if this was Bi-Partisan congress or even Democratic, he would have been impeached multiple times. For those who don't know, impeach does not mean being removed but rather needs to answer for allegations and charges against him before the congress.

But with Republicans...you know, Trump can be ass banging your 5 year old daughter and republican/conservative will still go along with him and provide tissue to wide himself off, as longs they get their agenda pushed down the American People's throat!


So we either wait for the FBI to bring up charges against him, or Congress flips in 2020, but by then Congress doesn't need to Impeach Trump, because Trump like always packs and runs away, perhaps back to Mother Russia!

Until then just line up your daughter for him, because Trump sure like pedaphilias..and self admiting, he is one!

Diving Mullah
Click to expand...

Ummmmmmmmmmm. Don't forget that the partisan Democrats didn't vote to remove Clinton from office. Presidents are allowed to be "bad" without being impeached. We've had many bad presidents. What in the hell would we impeach Trump for, or do you want to go ahead and impeach him before Mueller's investigations are over?
 
jbander said:
Have you noticed how the right almost across the board are willing to support the sexual abuse of children'
Click to expand...

What sexual abuse of children? Do you have any evidence? If there was evidence then these people would be in jail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom