• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

After Steinle verdict, rep unveils bill to imprison officials who shelter illegal immigrants

Mr Person said:
I didn't say conservatives rioted.

I said that if liberals passed a bill like THIS one - the one this thread is about - then conservatives would be rioting.
Click to expand...


Is this what they call, 'projection'?
 
Mr Person said:
I didn't say conservatives rioted.

I said that if liberals passed a bill like THIS one - the one this thread is about - then conservatives would be rioting.
Click to expand...

And I told you rioting is a liberal maneuver when they don't get their way. Conservatives use the legal system to resolve their differences.
 
Mr Person said:
Is this what they call "trolling"?
Click to expand...


Semed like a legitimate question.


Of the last 100 riots on our country, how many have been committed by liberals vs conservatives?
 
Slyfox696 said:
I'm not a liberal, so I'm not sure you have any idea what I've tried to argue. Congratulations on a post that is a total fail.
Click to expand...

Nope. You're 150% liberal. Welcome to the Liberal Collective, Komrade.
 
Old Sarge said:
And I told you rioting is a liberal maneuver when they don't get their way. Conservatives use the legal system to resolve their differences.
Click to expand...

dobieg said:
Semed like a legitimate question. Of the last 100 riots on our country, how many have been committed by liberals vs conservatives?
Click to expand...





If all you wanted to say is that you don't like liberals, then fine, you've said it. Congratulations.

:2wave:
 
Mr Person said:
If all you wanted to say is that you don't like liberals, then fine, you've said it. Congratulations.

:2wave:
Click to expand...

Typical liberal reaction, if someone disagrees with them then they must hate/dislike liberals! Sorry sport but I think liberalism is a utopian dream but I don't dislike liberals in general. There are some I can't stand but they are few. What is your next charge against us conservatives going to be?:rolleyes:
 
tres borrachos said:
My thoughts? Every passing day it gets harder and harder to continue to be a Republican with this kind of grandstanding.

The Steinle jury verdict was terrible. Just like the OJ verdict and the Casey Anthony verdict. Those are separate issues that need to be addressed honestly.

But back to the bill. The Republicans are now supporting the candidacy of a man who proudly ignored the laws not once, but twice, and was removed from his state's Supreme Court as a result of it. The Republicans, for the most part (including Moore), proudly and without any hesitation want and choose to ignore the laws that give same sex people the right to marry.

I'll have an interest in the Republican Party chasing after and wanting to lock up people who ignore the laws when they start looking inside themselves and their actions first.
Click to expand...


So you say "The Republicans are now supporting the candidacy of a man who proudly ignored the laws not once, but twice, and was removed from his state's Supreme Court as a result of it.". Gee I'm a Republican and I'm not supporting Moore and I know of numerous other Republicans who feel like I do so your charge is bogus. Why do people like you want to paint all Republicans with the evil brush?
 
TheGoverness said:
Nope. You're 150% liberal. Welcome to the Liberal Collective, Komrade.
Click to expand...
You claim to be a liberal living in Texas. You might as well say you're a woman on the Internet. Everyone knows a Texas liberal and a woman on the Internet are myths. ;)
 
Gaius46 said:
ICE detainer requests are just that - requests issued by ICE officers with no judicial oversight. They are not warrants and do not have the force of law.

The sheriff is free to ignore them if she sees fit. If ICE wants these people that badly they need to get warrants.
Click to expand...

Like I said before, hold them responsible for the actions of the criminal alien after their release. Make them an accessory if necessary.
 
Old Sarge said:
So you say "The Republicans are now supporting the candidacy of a man who proudly ignored the laws not once, but twice, and was removed from his state's Supreme Court as a result of it.". Gee I'm a Republican and I'm not supporting Moore and I know of numerous other Republicans who feel like I do so your charge is bogus. Why do people like you want to paint all Republicans with the evil brush?
Click to expand...

Because President Trump and the RNC are supporting Moore. Or do you assume every post or comment made is about you and you don't realize that you aren't the RNC and the "Republican" President?

I'm a Republican (a real one) and I don't brush myself as anything.
 
tres borrachos said:

Because President Trump and the RNC are supporting Moore. Or do you assume every post or comment made is about you and you don't realize that you aren't the RNC and the "Republican" President?

I'm a Republican (a real one) and I don't brush myself as anything.
Click to expand...

Sorry but you said Republicans not just the RNC, I am a Republican therefore you were including me in that statement. Words have meaning so when making a statement such as you did you should be specific about what you are referring to.
 
Old Sarge said:
Sorry but you said Republicans not just the RNC, I am a Republican therefore you were including me in that statement. Words have meaning so when making a statement such as you did you should be specific about what you are referring to.
Click to expand...

You're new here. When people say things like I did, everyone understands that the "Republicans" and "Republican Party" mean the RNC and the President and the lawmakers when people discuss those facts repeatedly on the board and it's in the news and in a post about a bill a Republican lawmaker has proposed. You shouldn't read every post and assume a poster is talking about you. Especially when their post is clearly talking about the Republican lawmakers, and presumably you are not a member of Congress.
 
tres borrachos said:
You're new here. When people say things like I did, everyone understands that the "Republicans" and "Republican Party" mean the RNC and the President and the lawmakers when people discuss those facts repeatedly on the board and it's in the news and in a post about a bill a Republican lawmaker has proposed. You shouldn't read every post and assume a poster is talking about you. Especially when their post is clearly talking about the Republican lawmakers, and presumably you are not a member of Congress.
Click to expand...

Yes I am new here, where are these understanding's in print?
I have been to a lot of forums and when people say Republicans or Democrats they are referring to the entire party in general. So as I asked please be specific in your charges.
 
Old Sarge said:
Yes I am new here, where is these understanding's in print? I have been to a lot of forums and when people say Republicans or Democrats they are referring to the entire party in general. So as I asked please be specific in your charges.
Click to expand...

Sorry, I've been here for almost 6 years, and I won't change how I post now because you will think every post someone ever makes about "Republicans" means the poster "Old Sarge". I doubt anyone else will change for you either. Perhaps you should read the post and see if the person is talking about you specifically or not. Those posts are easy to understand, as are the ones not specifically about you.

When I post about "Republicans" I'm usually posting about the kind of Republican being discussed. In this case, it was a lawmaker. If I wanted to post about myself or other individual Republicans, that would have been clear.

Don't look for things that aren't there. You will wear yourself out.
 
tres borrachos said:
Sorry, I've been here for almost 6 years, and I won't change how I post now because you will think every post someone ever makes about "Republicans" means the poster "Old Sarge". I doubt anyone else will change for you either. Perhaps you should read the post and see if the person is talking about you specifically or not. Those posts are easy to understand, as are the ones not specifically about you.

When I post about "Republicans" I'm usually posting about the kind of Republican being discussed. In this case, it was a lawmaker. If I wanted to post about myself or other individual Republicans, that would have been clear.

Don't look for things that aren't there. You will wear yourself out.
Click to expand...

Gee sport it seems to bother you more than it does me. I'm not asking you or anyone to change. Just be advised that I don't take any post at face value so if I don't understand what you are trying to say I am going to grill you.
 
Old Sarge said:
Gee sport it seems to bother you more than it does me. I'm not asking you or anyone to change. Just be advised that I don't take any post at face value so if I don't understand what you are trying to say I am going to grill you.
Click to expand...

Oh, you're going to "grill" me. Great. You do that, and I'll give your "grilling" the attention it deserves.
 
tres borrachos said:
Oh, you're going to "grill" me. Great. You do that, and I'll give your "grilling" the attention it deserves.
Click to expand...

Sorry miss I didn't realize you were so thin skinned, I will treat you with kid gloves in the future as it is clear you cannot have a debate without getting emotional about it. :violin
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom