• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Africans are being sold at Libyan slave markets. Thanks, Hillary Clinton.

ReverendHellh0und

ReverendHellh0und

I don't respect you.
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
79,903
Reaction score
20,981
Location
I love your hate.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
[h=1]Africans are being sold at Libyan slave markets. Thanks, Hillary Clinton.[/h]
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...ibya-scandal-glenn-reynolds-column/895853001/

Black Africans are being sold in open-air slave markets, and it’s Hillary Clinton’s fault. But you won’t hear much about that from the news media or the foreign-policy pundits, so let me explain.
Footage from Libya, released recently by CNN, showed young men from sub-Saharan Africa being auctioned off as farm workers in slave markets.
And how did we get to this point? As the BBC reported back in May, “Libya has been beset by chaos since NATO-backed forces overthrew long-serving ruler Col. Moammar Gadhafi in October 2011.”
Click to expand...




Just another day of the results of wars of choices.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Just another day of the results of wars of choices. [/FONT][/COLOR]
Click to expand...

Yep it's all Clinton's fault, no one from NATO agreed to it, it was all just Clinton :roll:
 
I don't blame Clinton any more than I do Bush for ISIL. A dictator created the human and social capital void, which inevitably would be occupied by local tyrants when the dictator died.

I found this part of the article interesting:

(And, of course, the damage is still compounding: How likely is North Korea’s Kim Jong Un to give up his nuclear weapons after seeing the worthlessness of U.S. promises to Gadhafi?)
Click to expand...

Another example is Ukraine. We promised to defend the country if they gave up their nukes. They did, we didn't.
 
shrubnose said:
If you have any realproof let's see it.
Click to expand...

Oh it has to be true it is written in a news paper.:lamo

Every Opinion on Trump is true why would they start lying now.:mrgreen:
 
Praxas said:
Bush made the call to attack Iraq did he not? Where did Clinton order the attack? She doesn't have that power.
Click to expand...


"and provide much insight into how, as secretary of state for the Obama administration, Clinton played a uniquely hands-on role in the war.
Sec. Clinton pressured a wary President Obama to join France and the U.K. in the war, the Times reported. Vice President Biden, National Security Adviser Tom Donilon and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, among others, opposed the war effort. Numerous government officials recalled that her hawkish enthusiasm was decisive in the "51-49 decision.""

"Clinton's leadership in the catastrophic war in Libya should ergo constantly be at the forefront of any discussion of the presidential primary.
Throughout the campaign, Clinton has tried to have her cake and eat it too. She has flaunted her leadership in the war as a sign of her supposed foreign policy experience, yet, at the same moment, strived to distance herself from the disastrous results of said war."

https://www.salon.com/2016/03/02/ev...illary_clinton_led_nato_bombing_of_libya_was/



fact. if it was not for hillary, obama never would have bombed lybia.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
"and provide much insight into how, as secretary of state for the Obama administration, Clinton played a uniquely hands-on role in the war.
Sec. Clinton pressured a wary President Obama to join France and the U.K. in the war, the Times reported. Vice President Biden, National Security Adviser Tom Donilon and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, among others, opposed the war effort. Numerous government officials recalled that her hawkish enthusiasm was decisive in the "51-49 decision.""

"Clinton's leadership in the catastrophic war in Libya should ergo constantly be at the forefront of any discussion of the presidential primary.
Throughout the campaign, Clinton has tried to have her cake and eat it too. She has flaunted her leadership in the war as a sign of her supposed foreign policy experience, yet, at the same moment, strived to distance herself from the disastrous results of said war."

https://www.salon.com/2016/03/02/ev...illary_clinton_led_nato_bombing_of_libya_was/



fact. if it was not for hillary, obama never would have bombed lybia.
Click to expand...

Who had the power to approve an attack, Clinton or Obama. No matter how you slice it, she didn't have the power to invade. Bush did. You lose.
 
Praxas said:
Who had the power to approve an attack, Clinton or Obama. No matter how you slice it, she didn't have the power to invade. Bush did. You lose.
Click to expand...



She who must be defended at all costs..........,


fact. if it was not for hillary, obama never would have bombed lybia.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
She who must be defended at all costs..........,


fact. if it was not for hillary, obama never would have bombed lybia.
Click to expand...

Nice crystal ball you have there. Facts are she didn't have the power to order an attack. I know you hate facts, but then most Trump supporters do.
 
Praxas said:
Nice crystal ball you have there. Facts are she didn't have the power to order an attack. I know you hate facts, but then most Trump supporters do.
Click to expand...



defend mein party always defend mein party!


you communists will blindly lap up what your democrat masters tell you to.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
defend mein party always defend mein party!


you communists will blindly lap up what your democrat masters tell you to.
Click to expand...

Show where I am incorrect in what I have said. Are you saying Clinton has the authority to order an attack? I claimed Obama is the one who had the authority to attack. Prove me wrong instead of throwing petty insults out there Rev.
 
Praxas said:
Show where I am incorrect in what I have said. Are you saying Clinton has the authority to order an attack? I claimed Obama is the one who had the authority to attack. Prove me wrong instead of throwing petty insults out there Rev.
Click to expand...

Are you blaming Obama for the young men being sold as slaves in Libya then?
 
Praxas said:
Show where I am incorrect in what I have said. Are you saying Clinton has the authority to order an attack? I claimed Obama is the one who had the authority to attack. Prove me wrong instead of throwing petty insults out there Rev.
Click to expand...




Your strawman is irrelevant. don't cry about insults, if you are going to throw them,
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Just another day of the results of wars of choices. [/FONT][/COLOR]
Click to expand...

Last I knew Hillary as SoS had no control over DoD. In fact the DoD is second only to the President. It is the DoD who would have suggested and orchestrated any and all attacks with permission from the President. So Hillary had nothing to do with this.

In any case the only ones responsible for this slave trade are the slave traders themselves.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Your strawman is irrelevant. don't cry about insults, if you are going to throw them,
Click to expand...

So in other words you can't prove me wrong, got it. You can only throw out communist insults because you're mad you were wrong and can't handle the facts.
 
Praxas said:
So in other words you can't prove me wrong, got it. You can only throw out communist insults because you're mad you were wrong and can't handle the facts.
Click to expand...



You called me a trump supporter. I called you a communist. seems fair.
 
Kal'Stang said:
Last I knew Hillary as SoS had no control over DoD. In fact the DoD is second only to the President. It is the DoD who would have suggested and orchestrated any and all attacks with permission from the President. So Hillary had nothing to do with this.

In any case the only ones responsible for this slave trade are the slave traders themselves.
Click to expand...




read my links, hillary pushed for and won obama over for the war in lybia. she touted it as one of her succsesses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom