• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Proves that Republicans are the Liar Party

And yet we know that the D's tried to coronate the very corrupt and the very incompetent Hillary.

Take off your Fun House Glasses PLEASE...they are all together as a group failing America.

To disastrous results, to include BIG PAIN

If you think that Hillary is any more corrupt or incompetent than Trump, you're nuts. Furthermore, she's not a sexual predator like Moore and Trump so your comparison is lacking.

Hillary is an arrogant, phony elitist in her own way but she's more intelligent and politically competent, ANY DAY, than Casino Mussolini is. I wonder, though, how many of our political heroes from the past could have withstood the tide of conspiracy theories and the tsunami of right wing bile that has been directed at Hillary. As unaware as she is of her own lack of human warmth, she's not a fraction of the monster that is the greedy orange moron in the white house. If he's guilty of one tenth of what I suspect, the American people have found a new bottom for their ethical standard.
 
If you think that Hillary is any more corrupt or incompetent than Trump, you're nuts. Furthermore, she's not a sexual predator like Moore and Trump so your comparison is lacking.

Hillary is an arrogant, phony elitist in her own way but she's more intelligent and politically competent, ANY DAY, than Casino Mussolini is. I wonder, though, how many of our political heroes from the past could have withstood the tide of conspiracy theories and the tsunami of right wing bile that has been directed at Hillary. As unaware as she is of her own lack of human warmth, she's not a fraction of the monster that is the greedy orange moron in the white house. If he's guilty of one tenth of what I suspect, the American people have found a new bottom for their ethical standard.

How did you ever miss me here...

"They all suck" is the argument, not "Trump is better than Hillary on corruption".
 
You posted Roy Moores Senate Facebook page.

That literally means nothing.

You might as well have just posted a youtube video of kittens doing flips and it would have been better evidence than what you posted.

It means just as much as what has been presented by the media. In fact, it means MORE than what's been presented by the media because they were offered this same information...but rejected it. That indicates the media is taking sides. It places a further cloud of non-credibility on the accuser's statements.
 
Ahhh... So witness testimony isn't evidence in your world. Gotcha. :lol:

Keep supporting the child molester.

By itself, it's not enough.

When the witness testimony is shown to be factually wrong, it's not enough.

When we see indications that the media is presenting some testimony and not other testimony, it's not enough.

Anyone who wishes to make a fair judgment should hold off with their judgment until they get real, conclusive evidence...like pictures, bank records, etc. He said, she said, just isn't enough.
 
It means just as much as what has been presented by the media. In fact, it means MORE than what's been presented by the media because they were offered this same information...but rejected it. That indicates the media is taking sides. It places a further cloud of non-credibility on the accuser's statements.

:lamo
 
What did he say that is not true?

Before being convicted, John Gacey never admitted to killing 30 young men. What would you say about someone repeating Trump's words to defend the serial killer?

Any more silly questions?
 
I'd agree that he is. But I fault him for repeatedly torpedoing the agenda that elected him as well as his communications staff.

He needs to stop that if he wants to be more effective.

So all in all I give Trump a 5 or 6 out of 10, at least so far.

I'll give him a 7 or 8. He gets into some unneccessary verbal fights that give the libruls news cycle that lead them to yap for three or four days about nothing, however he is not a professional politician, which is one of the reasons I voted for him. After the tax cut package is passed and the ACA individual mandate is gone, I'll increase the rating to a 10.
 
I'll give him a 7 or 8. He gets into some unneccessary verbal fights that give the libruls news cycle that lead them to yap for three or four days about nothing, however he is not a professional politician, which is one of the reasons I voted for him. After the tax cut package is passed and the ACA individual mandate is gone, I'll increase the rating to a 10.

If those pass, I'll bump his rating as well, to perhaps 7 or 8.

Trump does need to stop getting into silly Twitter slap fights, the news (political propaganda) media cover the pointless slap fight rather than covering the White House message, and that's a self-inflicted loss.
 
I'll give him a 7 or 8. He gets into some unneccessary verbal fights that give the libruls news cycle that lead them to yap for three or four days about nothing, however he is not a professional politician, which is one of the reasons I voted for him. After the tax cut package is passed and the ACA individual mandate is gone, I'll increase the rating to a 10.

I'd give him an 8 or 9 because those verbal fights are frequently deliberate trolling on Trump's part to trigger that yapping you mentioned. The liberals want stuff about him to spin, so he gives them stupid stuff...and it makes them look like idiots.

That he's not a professional politician IS one of his strengths. He's not beholden to any special interests and he's causing a LOT of trouble for the Congressmen who are.

But those Congressional Elites have a lot of power, so I won't be holding my breath for a tax package, Obamacare action or anything else from them.
 
How did you ever miss me here...

"They all suck" is the argument, not "Trump is better than Hillary on corruption".

Okra and **** sandwiches both suck but one is waaaay worse than the other. Your list of character flaws was lacking with regard to Trump. I was trying to give a more accurate perspective on comparing the two, as there is no rational comparison. She is unlikable, he is a rabid douche.
 
I'd give him an 8 or 9 because those verbal fights are frequently deliberate trolling on Trump's part to trigger that yapping you mentioned. The liberals want stuff about him to spin, so he gives them stupid stuff...and it makes them look like idiots.

So, Trump says and does profoundly stupid or cruel things and it makes the liberals look like idiots? Now, there is a prime example of the ass-backward, juvenile, rubber and glue denial of the right. Such a magical world you must inhabit to think that way. What a tenacious religion you've made of the orangutan in chief.

No wonder our nation is so divided, we can't even agree that dumb people saying dumb **** is dumb. Now it's an indictment of those who disagree.

That he's not a professional politician IS one of his strengths. He's not beholden to any special interests and he's causing a LOT of trouble for the Congressmen who are.

Dude, he's going to cause trouble for the whole world. The fact that he's not a politician doesn't mean he's not beholding to anyone. He is beholding to a toxic philosophy and that's plenty.

But those Congressional Elites have a lot of power, so I won't be holding my breath for a tax package, Obamacare action or anything else from them.

LOL. That's because there is NO morality in either, they are the manifestation of fiscal elitism and we can't treat wealth acquisition as the highest calling and expect to win, as a nation. The conservative philosophy is so greed-centric and hostile to humanity that it can only harm us. That so many conservatives proudly accept all of the suffering they create is central to the lacking morals of conservatives.
 
Not garbage. Statements from people that directly contradict that lady's statements.

I find it interesting the lady said she approached a couple of news networks to tell her story and was ignored.

Is that common for a reporter to ignore a story they dont like or fails to promote their agenda?
 
So, Trump says and does profoundly stupid or cruel things and it makes the liberals look like idiots?

I don't consider the "verbal fights" that Trump gets into with the media to be "stupid or cruel". Dismissed.

Dude, he's going to cause trouble for the whole world. The fact that he's not a politician doesn't mean he's not beholding to anyone. He is beholding to a toxic philosophy and that's plenty.

Well, you may consider his philosophy to be toxic...many others don't. But yes...he is not beholden to any special interests and he IS causing trouble for the part of the world that supports globalization and the continuation (as opposed to the resolution) of war.

The rest of your post is so rife with hyperpartisanship...it deserves no comment.
 
I find it interesting the lady said she approached a couple of news networks to tell her story and was ignored.

Is that common for a reporter to ignore a story they dont like or fails to promote their agenda?

This is quite common nowadays, it seems.

The Mainstream Media ignores a LOT of news because it hampers or doesn't support their various witch hunts.
 
If those pass, I'll bump his rating as well, to perhaps 7 or 8.

Trump does need to stop getting into silly Twitter slap fights, the news (political propaganda) media cover the pointless slap fight rather than covering the White House message, and that's a self-inflicted loss.

Agreed. I am quite okay with his using Twitter to bypass a media that does not fairly report on his administration , however he does need to work out what to comment on and what to ignore. The UCLA basketball players all apologized for their behavior and thanked Trump for getting them out of jail in China, I would have just ignored the moron dad of one of them.
 
Agreed. I am quite okay with his using Twitter to bypass a media that does not fairly report on his administration , however he does need to work out what to comment on and what to ignore. The UCLA basketball players all apologized for their behavior and thanked Trump for getting them out of jail in China, I would have just ignored the moron dad of one of them.

Agreed.

I like if he uses his Twitter to bypass the biased media, get his message out, forward his agenda. Detractions from this, not so much.

Twitter is a powerful communications tool, but with all tools, one must master the skill of using it, and using it to their advantage and not detriment.
 
I'd give him an 8 or 9 because those verbal fights are frequently deliberate trolling on Trump's part to trigger that yapping you mentioned. The liberals want stuff about him to spin, so he gives them stupid stuff...and it makes them look like idiots.

That he's not a professional politician IS one of his strengths. He's not beholden to any special interests and he's causing a LOT of trouble for the Congressmen who are.

But those Congressional Elites have a lot of power, so I won't be holding my breath for a tax package, Obamacare action or anything else from them.

In my opinion, if the tax package does not pass, there may not be a democrat wave in 2018, but their will be alot of establishment republicans who will either be primaried out of lose their seat to a democrat. I think most of them now are aware of that, but there are still a few assholes like McCain, Collins. and Flake, at least until 2018 that seem to take pleasure in tanking republican legislation.
 
Back
Top Bottom