• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump silent on Moore, yet speaks on Franken.

Vetplus40

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 15, 2017
Messages
4,592
Reaction score
2,283
Location
South Western Mississippi
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
First off, it is obvious to anyone who has ever worked in DC politics that Trump listens to nobody from a PR and optics standpoint. After all, Trump himself said that he is the only one that really matters and his collosial ego shows up almost each and every day in tweets about one thing or another.

Politically, Trumps's silence on Moore was totally expected. After all, he has legions of women claiming he did improper things to them. Commenting on Moore would have only brought all of those past allegations to the surface again. In other words, Trump commenting would have been a PR problem for him. As such, he did theesmart thing and remained silent.

As expected, Trump couldnt remain silent for very long. Low and behold he decides to speak out about Franken (while remaining silent on Moore). All of a sudden, we are innundated with replays of the old Trump "Access Hollywood" confession of sexual assault, pursuing sex with married women (while married to Melania) and replays of the women accusing Trump of sexual assault.

Obviously, the "Egomanic-in-Chief" just cant help himself. He has obviously learning little or nothing about how to be anything but a joke in the past 12 months.

Now, correct me if I am wrong, but didnt Trump vow to sue ALL of the women that had levelled accusations after the election?
 
First off, it is obvious to anyone who has ever worked in DC politics that Trump listens to nobody from a PR and optics standpoint. After all, Trump himself said that he is the only one that really matters and his collosial ego shows up almost each and every day in tweets about one thing or another.

Politically, Trumps's silence on Moore was totally expected. After all, he has legions of women claiming he did improper things to them. Commenting on Moore would have only brought all of those past allegations to the surface again. In other words, Trump commenting would have been a PR problem for him. As such, he did theesmart thing and remained silent.

As expected, Trump couldnt remain silent for very long. Low and behold he decides to speak out about Franken (while remaining silent on Moore). All of a sudden, we are innundated with replays of the old Trump "Access Hollywood" confession of sexual assault, pursuing sex with married women (while married to Melania) and replays of the women accusing Trump of sexual assault.

Obviously, the "Egomanic-in-Chief" just cant help himself. He has obviously learning little or nothing about how to be anything but a joke in the past 12 months.

Now, correct me if I am wrong, but didnt Trump vow to sue ALL of the women that had levelled accusations after the election?

If these accusations of Trump are true........he should be gone yesterday.
 
Now, correct me if I am wrong, but didnt Trump vow to sue ALL of the women that had levelled accusations after the election?

I vaguely remember hearing something like that -- but, as is often the case in accusations that arise during a political campaign, the accusers fade back into the woodwork after the election. And, if I remember correctly, a couple of Trump's big accusers made their claims "anonymously." Just hit and run accusations. Nothing new. I'm sure the Donald's advisers told him it would be pointless to sue these women.
 
Don't try to throw known fact into the mix man, you're only going to confuse people.

Do you know what the word 'fact' means? He didn't state a fact. He stated an opinion. Even if he meant what you thought, that's not a fact.
 
If these accusations of Trump are true........he should be gone yesterday.

Most of the American people who voted after hearing those accusations agree that Trump should not be President. Sadly, we are saddled with an ancient mechanism from the 1700's designed by elites to give power to the elites to thwart the will of the people.
 
Trump and Moore will both be judged harshly by history.

If anyone thinks that isn't fair let's hear your story.
 
Do you know what the word 'fact' means? He didn't state a fact. He stated an opinion. Even if he meant what you thought, that's not a fact.

I do, but are you postulating a world in which women come forward about a mans sexual assault, are proven to be telling the truth, and the man can just walk free?
 
I do, but are you postulating a world in which women come forward about a mans sexual assault, are proven to be telling the truth, and the man can just walk free?

You are postulating that all criminals are convicted. That is not a fact.
 
First off, it is obvious to anyone who has ever worked in DC politics that Trump listens to nobody from a PR and optics standpoint. After all, Trump himself said that he is the only one that really matters and his collosial ego shows up almost each and every day in tweets about one thing or another.

Politically, Trumps's silence on Moore was totally expected. After all, he has legions of women claiming he did improper things to them. Commenting on Moore would have only brought all of those past allegations to the surface again. In other words, Trump commenting would have been a PR problem for him. As such, he did theesmart thing and remained silent.

As expected, Trump couldnt remain silent for very long. Low and behold he decides to speak out about Franken (while remaining silent on Moore).
All of a sudden, we are innundated with replays of the old Trump "Access Hollywood" confession of sexual assault, pursuing sex with married women (while married to Melania) and replays of the women accusing Trump of sexual assault.

Obviously, the "Egomanic-in-Chief" just cant help himself. He has obviously learning little or nothing about how to be anything but a joke in the past 12 months.

Now, correct me if I am wrong, but didnt Trump vow to sue ALL of the women that had levelled accusations after the election?

We are?
Where did you see that replay inundation?
I expected to see it but haven't.
What did happen with those accusations that were leveled?
 
Trump and Moore will both be judged harshly by history.

If anyone thinks that isn't fair let's hear your story.

I agree
Trump= record stocks,record consumer confidence,illegals way down,other countries paying their way in the UN,houses selling at fastest they have in 30 years. History books her comes our Trump


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
First off, it is obvious to anyone who has ever worked in DC politics that Trump listens to nobody from a PR and optics standpoint. After all, Trump himself said that he is the only one that really matters and his collosial ego shows up almost each and every day in tweets about one thing or another.

Politically, Trumps's silence on Moore was totally expected. After all, he has legions of women claiming he did improper things to them. Commenting on Moore would have only brought all of those past allegations to the surface again. In other words, Trump commenting would have been a PR problem for him. As such, he did theesmart thing and remained silent.

As expected, Trump couldnt remain silent for very long. Low and behold he decides to speak out about Franken (while remaining silent on Moore). All of a sudden, we are innundated with replays of the old Trump "Access Hollywood" confession of sexual assault, pursuing sex with married women (while married to Melania) and replays of the women accusing Trump of sexual assault.

Obviously, the "Egomanic-in-Chief" just cant help himself. He has obviously learning little or nothing about how to be anything but a joke in the past 12 months.

Now, correct me if I am wrong, but didnt Trump vow to sue ALL of the women that had levelled accusations after the election?

Not commenting on a case where there is no evidence other then the words from people from 40 years ago.

Commenting on a case with photographic evidence.

Seems about right.
 
First off, it is obvious to anyone who has ever worked in DC politics that Trump listens to nobody from a PR and optics standpoint. After all, Trump himself said that he is the only one that really matters and his collosial ego shows up almost each and every day in tweets about one thing or another.

Politically, Trumps's silence on Moore was totally expected. After all, he has legions of women claiming he did improper things to them. Commenting on Moore would have only brought all of those past allegations to the surface again. In other words, Trump commenting would have been a PR problem for him. As such, he did theesmart thing and remained silent.

As expected, Trump couldnt remain silent for very long. Low and behold he decides to speak out about Franken (while remaining silent on Moore). All of a sudden, we are innundated with replays of the old Trump "Access Hollywood" confession of sexual assault, pursuing sex with married women (while married to Melania) and replays of the women accusing Trump of sexual assault.

Obviously, the "Egomanic-in-Chief" just cant help himself. He has obviously learning little or nothing about how to be anything but a joke in the past 12 months.

Now, correct me if I am wrong, but didnt Trump vow to sue ALL of the women that had levelled accusations after the election?



The Groper-in-Chief speaks on the morality of others.
 
Back
Top Bottom