Investigate Trump for what he’s done while an elected representative of the people. There’s hardly a congressman on The Hill who could pass such an investigation into his pre-election conduct. They are all cocksmen.
Your link to quote is where....?
Maggie, you've already made it clear: you place not "destroying" the life of an accused, even if it as guilty accused, over destroying the life of accusers and over having utter scumbags occupy positions of power that can affect you.
Why defend Trump if you don't care about anything but that?
But enough about your position, why on Earth and/or in this universe does it NOT matter what people did before getting elected? I promise you, I can come up with a list of things you absolutely would agree mattered if they were done before election (being a murderer, selling heroin, selling heroin to kids, bribing Putin to damage Republicans, raping 6-month-olds while drowning puppies, etc etc etc.). So you need to explain why you think multiple sexual assaults doesn't matter.
I understand why you think it's hard to disprove an allegation now, but I don't understand why you think that's different from if this happened three years ago, or one year. They're all he-said/she-saids. And since Trump's accusers are generally people he interacted with non-privately, it's not like he's lost out on some Alibi opportunity.
If you have the "want to take him down" angle, then why on Earth would all of these women suddenly decide to lie against him if he was innocent? If he didn't do anything to them, if he was as nice to him as he says or if he had nothing to do with him he says (there are a lot of them, hence the generality), then WHY on earth would they simultaneously decide to take him down?
Why? At least give a motive for the alleged lying.
Well, anyway,
- "They are all cocksmen" is quite obviously false. It's only certain people who are
- I do not recall such a vigorous defense of "Hollywood Liberals" or "liberal lamestream media" Mark Halperin. Will I find an equally vigorous defense of them by you?
- The idea of defending Trump because of a (false) allegation that ALL of them are utter pieces of **** seems insane to me. Shouldn't we not have pieces of ****? You know, the kind of person Trump said that he
wasn't?
- Remember anything about "draining the swamp"? Why don't you want to drain the swamp? Why is the swamp suddenly not worth worrying about if all the swamp creatures do it....? It's logically incoherent and incontinent.
At some point, you need to just fess up and say "I do not give a **** what the person I voted for did full stop."
If you don't care then say it. Fine. There's nothing to debate because any debate would be entirely personal. I'd say that was horrible, crappy, and dead wrong, but then it wouldn't matter if you were literally just saying it's your personal opinion.
But if you want to suggest that
other people should agree, you need to do some careful thinking and 'splainin.
