- Joined
- Aug 28, 2016
- Messages
- 3,995
- Reaction score
- 1,261
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
So you are FOR bans to immigration for countries you don't like, but you are against BANS for countries you do like. Classic con job logic there.
I don't see the logic in your statement as a reply to the op. It's more a question of obeying local German law vs foreing law.
So you are FOR bans to immigration for countries you don't like, but you are against BANS for countries you do like. Classic con job logic there.
I didnt know Jews were a country?
What county was discriminated by Germany?
Well that's dumb.
one is a ban on travel from 8 or so nations where vetting is not adequate and harbors known terrorists. the other is allowing a company to ban all jews from thier airlines.
Yeah, that's why your boy Trump said he wanted a Muslim ban during his campaign. And yet you have no problem with him allowing Saudi Arabia OFF the list, so spare me your faux outrage. Has nothing to do with vetting.
You communists and your beautiful imagination. I did not vote for trump. I would ban saudi arabia as well.
he stated that, but the reality is it's a ban on muslims from countries who we cant vett well until we can. I'm ok with that.
You can say you didn't vote for Trump all you want, your support of him is through and through. You are a con plain and simple.
Sure it is, sure it is. And I have a bridge in Iraq to sell you too. Again, you just prove again how much of a Trump supporter you really are. Libertarian my ass, you're a con.
I don't see the logic in your statement as a reply to the op. It's more a question of obeying local German law vs foreing law.
that is because there isn't any.