• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

German court: Kuwait Airways can refuse Israeli passengers

The Associated Press


What’s next? Will the Jews have to wear yellow stars again?

So you are FOR bans to immigration for countries you don't like, but you are against BANS for countries you do like. Classic con job logic there.
 
So you are FOR bans to immigration for countries you don't like, but you are against BANS for countries you do like. Classic con job logic there.

I don't see the logic in your statement as a reply to the op. It's more a question of obeying local German law vs foreing law.
 
The Associated Press


What’s next? Will the Jews have to wear yellow stars again?

It is a surprise that a German court would rule against application of German law. On the other hand, we have issued second Passports to US citizens going to Muslim countries after previously having been to Israel.
 
I don't see the logic in your statement as a reply to the op. It's more a question of obeying local German law vs foreing law.

The logic is quite simply. Vols and many on the right have no problem discriminating against Muslims or an entire country but then complain when an entire country is discriminated by someone else. Can't have it both ways.
 
So you are FOR bans to immigration for countries you don't like, but you are against BANS for countries you do like. Classic con job logic there.



Well that's dumb.


one is a ban on travel from 8 or so nations where vetting is not adequate and harbors known terrorists. the other is allowing a company to ban all jews from thier airlines.
 
I didnt know Jews were a country?

What county was discriminated by Germany?

It's the country of Israel that is being discriminated against, not JEWS. And YOU are for the US discriminating against Muslim countries so that dog don't hunt.
 
Well that's dumb.


one is a ban on travel from 8 or so nations where vetting is not adequate and harbors known terrorists. the other is allowing a company to ban all jews from thier airlines.

Yeah, that's why your boy Trump said he wanted a Muslim ban during his campaign. And yet you have no problem with him allowing Saudi Arabia OFF the list, so spare me your faux outrage. Has nothing to do with vetting.
 
Yeah, that's why your boy Trump said he wanted a Muslim ban during his campaign. And yet you have no problem with him allowing Saudi Arabia OFF the list, so spare me your faux outrage. Has nothing to do with vetting.


You communists and your beautiful imagination. I did not vote for trump. I would ban saudi arabia as well.


he stated that, but the reality is it's a ban on muslims from countries who we cant vett well until we can. I'm ok with that.
 
You communists and your beautiful imagination. I did not vote for trump. I would ban saudi arabia as well.

You can say you didn't vote for Trump all you want, your support of him is through and through. You are a con plain and simple.

he stated that, but the reality is it's a ban on muslims from countries who we cant vett well until we can. I'm ok with that.

Sure it is, sure it is. And I have a bridge in Iraq to sell you too. Again, you just prove again how much of a Trump supporter you really are. Libertarian my ass, you're a con.
 
You can say you didn't vote for Trump all you want, your support of him is through and through. You are a con plain and simple.


And you support communism and racist ideology. I voted for Gary johnson, Would have loved to have voted for john McAfee for the lulz.




Sure it is, sure it is. And I have a bridge in Iraq to sell you too. Again, you just prove again how much of a Trump supporter you really are. Libertarian my ass, you're a con.


So, if I say I support one aspect of something trump has done, that makes me a trump supporter?


1. I am against his stance on the war on drugs.
2. he's still engaging in military adveneturism did not bring troops home.
3. he's pro affirmative action
4. He's on record against gay marriage
5. he reinstated the 1033 program so cops can get tanks
6. he's pro prison
7. he's pro eminent domain
8. restricted cuban travel
9. universal health care


These are things off the top of my head I disagree with trump on. you know the things you guys never talk about because your too busy worrying about koi ponds and hand sizes.
 
What I understood is that the court don't see the airline responsible to a law of their homeland, avoiding forcing the airline to be punished by their homeland.

But on the other hand I presume the company is responsible in their decision to operate overseas where there is law that guarantee everyone equal rights and against religious and other kinds of discrimination.

Anyway, as far it is only a airline and there are competitors which Israeli can choose as alternative, I don't see a big deal.
 
I don't see the logic in your statement as a reply to the op. It's more a question of obeying local German law vs foreing law.

that is because there isn't any.
 
The Associated Press


What’s next? Will the Jews have to wear yellow stars again?

You didn't read the article that well.

The Kuwait government has a ban on Israel right now. If the airline was to go there they could be fined.
the german court ruled the way that they should have.

It has nothing to do with Jews.
 
Back
Top Bottom