Woman who accused Bill Clinton of rape lashes out at Monica Lewinsky over her #MeToo tweet

Broaddrick criticized Lewinsky for failing to come to her defense when she initially came forward with her accusations against Clinton in the 1990s.


'Better late than never Monica Lewinsky's ME TOO. I have always felt sad for you, but where were you when we needed you?' she tweeted.


'Your silence was deafening in the 90's when Kathleen, Paula and I needed your voice.'


Read more: Bill Clinton rape accuser slams Monica Lewinsky for #MeToo | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Click to expand...

Where was she indeed?

zimmer said:

Where was she indeed?

Click to expand...

I get that you think this is funny, but it's not.

The way people internally process trauma is complex. I know a lot of sexual assault/rape/coercion victims who, even years after the fact, refuse to call it what it was, even if they are willing to acknowledge the damaging affect it had on them. It is part of how people cope, a lot of the time.

The 90's was also a murkier time as far as consent. We still had states where raping your partner was legal. Most people could recognize it as rape if someone held a gun to your head, tied your hands, and forcibly had sex with you, but very few people could recognize coercion or power inequality as also being a form of sexual violence. Even today, a lot of people who've even experienced it themselves struggle with that. The number of times I've heard, "Well, I was alone in a room with him, so I was asking for it." Seriously, it depresses the **** out of me.

So, this is not funny. And it is duly noted that all you care about is scoring political points, not the actual experiences of these women.

Firstly, I don't think we should be attacking women for coming out about this stuff unless it's proven that they have done so falsely. It sets a bad precedent. It's fine to debate the merits of the accusation and whether we are inclined to believe it or not, but I don't think it's fair to say that they did others a disservice by not coming out or other such nonsense.

Secondly, with all of that said, Juanita made a sworn statement in the Paula Jones case that the rumors regarding her and Clinton were completely untrue. She made a statement under penalty of perjury, and now is pretending that this statement doesn't exist even though in reality what she is saying is that she committed perjury. Now I'm not trying to attack her. If what she says is true, it's a very messy complicated and ugly thing for her to deal with the best she can. But at the same time, I think it's fair to ask of her that she shut the **** up when it comes to how other women process sexual exploitation of any kind. This is the kind of statement that could only be made by somebody that has no concept what so ever of throwing stones in glass houses.

Funny how libs are suddenly taking sexual allegations against Bubba seriously. :roll:

SmokeAndMirrors said:

I get that you think this is funny, but it's not.

The way people internally process trauma is complex. I know a lot of sexual assault/rape/coercion victims who, even years after the fact, refuse to call it what it was, even if they are willing to acknowledge the damaging affect it had on them. It is part of how people cope, a lot of the time.

The 90's was also a murkier time as far as consent. We still had states where raping your partner was legal. Most people could recognize it as rape if someone held a gun to your head, tied your hands, and forcibly had sex with you, but very few people could recognize coercion or power inequality as also being a form of sexual violence. Even today, a lot of people who've even experienced it themselves struggle with that. The number of times I've heard, "Well, I was alone in a room with him, so I was asking for it." Seriously, it depresses the **** out of me.

So, this is not funny. And it is duly noted that all you care about is scoring political points, not the actual experiences of these women.

Click to expand...

Funny?
Where is anything in the OP illustrates humor?

The Clintons have been getting away with serious criminalities for decades. Not only getting away with them, but being elevated to Royalty status by the Socialists of America Partei (SAPs) in the process.

GET YOUR HISTORY STRAIGHT SECTION
The 90’s was not a murkier time. It was a time sexual harassment was front and center, and given the opportunity to address it at the highest office in the land, The SAPs, their propaganda arm, the Goebbels Inspired Media Propagandists (GIMPs), the FemiNazi’s all conspired to protect the rapist, sexual predator, perjurer, scum at the helm.THEY DID SO AGGRESSIVELY AND VISCIOUSLY... essentially raping the justice system *

That is the history of the 90’s under Bill Clinton and sexual harassment.

Lewinsky shut her yap for decades.

The only time she opened it was to complain about being bullied by Drudge, or those on the right... which is utter stupidity.

So... I have a couple questions for her.

Where was she when it came to Juanta Broaddrick?
What does her #MeToo mean? Is she aiming her guns at the rapist Bill Clinton? Or someone else?

*Bob Packwood (R-OR) was investigated and ejected for kissing women during the 1990’s. If I recall correctly, they subpoenaed his diary.