- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 42,744
- Reaction score
- 22,569
- Location
- Bonners Ferry ID USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Beats me. :shrug: I don't know Kyle or the history of whatever it is he said/did. But good try at deflecting.
IS she Harriet Tubman?
I didn't say he WAS a third world dictator, I said he wants to be one.
Beats me. :shrug: I don't know Kyle or the history of whatever it is he said/did. But good try at deflecting.
You read minds?
I can't believe so many small brains are still getting upset about a tweet.
No. Now answer the question.
I think it stems from the fact that almost no one is willing to admit that what she did to get her degree was unethical, if not illegal.
Even my grand mother on my mothers side had to pass the test necessary to claim she was native American. This dopey democrat just checked a box on her application form.
ITS THE SAME DAMN THING as the situation with Warren!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If it is being done in a derogatory way to demean and insult the person because they self identify as that group, and the person using it has a history of racist views, then yes, it could well be racist.
:lamo
Leftists are more worried about the facts around a woman that lied about being an Indian to exploit special opportunities reserved for Indians than they are about the woman that lied about being an Indian to exploit special opportunities reserved for women.
Trumps use of the word 'Pocahontas' to describe Warren is wrong and inappropriate. The correct term is 'Fauxcahontas'. She is as fake an Indian as is Ward Churchill.
You don't understand, likely because you don't wish to understand. Calling Warren Pocahontas is not racist nor is it an attempt to ridicule Pocahontas, but to ridicule Warren for falsely appropriating indian lineage. It just upsets you because Warren is one of your tribe members and you feel you have to defend her using whatever means necessary. So you use the bogus charge of racism, which is where you guys always go when you cant make an intelligent argument.
Except.... she didn’t seem to get any special preference for doing this.
But it’s funny to see the snowflakes like you panic about it.
Warren aides clammed up yesterday and refused to answer questions about why she stopped listing herself in the AALS directory after 1995. Around that time, Harvard Law School started boasting that Warren was their first minority female professor.
Bernstein reported on Sunday that beginning in 1986 and continuing through 1995, Warren had listed herself as a minority professor in the Association of American Law Schools desk book.
It's casual racism. Not necessarily "red men are savages" racism. But, just a casual racial dig. To deny that it is is absurd.
"Casual racism' lol that's a new one. Had she claimed to be part German to get preferential treatment and Trump called her Eva Braun would that be 'casual racism' also? Of course not. You guys on the left really need to get off this 'everything is racist' kick.
Trump has a very high likelihood of saying something racist. Because he is a racist. It's not that hard to understand. Since Trump is a racist, he says racist things. That doesn't mean he's part of the KKK. It just means he's an asshole who has never had to learn how to behave in civilized society.
There you go again. Trump isn't racist. Racially insensitive maybe, but racist, no. Here is a dictionary definition of racism you might want to refer to before you make accusations like that:
prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior
Trump has a very high likelihood of saying something racist. Because he is a racist. It's not that hard to understand. Since Trump is a racist, he says racist things. That doesn't mean he's part of the KKK. It just means he's an asshole who has never had to learn how to behave in civilized society.
I've stated the evidence for my opinion. It's fine with me if you disagree. You might tell me why you disagree. What has he done or said that leads you to believe that he understands his role as president and its' limitations? A back and forth of 'sn'ot/s'to gets boring after a while.
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump Nov 3
Pocahontas just stated that the Democrats, lead by the legendary Crooked Hillary Clinton, rigged the Primaries! Lets go FBI & Justice Dept.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought Pocahontas passed away centuries ago ............
sounds like Trump to me.
Yes - it a racist comment and we see right here in its use that the right wing does not like to be deprived of its ugly weapons.
:shrug: Like I said, I don't know Kyle or the history of whatever it is he said/did. Only reason I can think of to bring him (whoever he is) into the discussion is to deflect away from the fact that Trumps tweet isn't racist because it is actually just him mocking someone who lied about being a Native American. You could call him rude for doing so. Un-Presidential for doing so. An idiot for doing so. But what it is not is racist. And calling him such based on this would be nothing more than hyperbolic exaggeration at best. Resulting in a demeaning of the word "racist" which in the end just makes people start ignoring the word which would be a detriment to when actual racist things happen.