• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The State of Free Speech and Tolerance in America [CATO Inst. surveys]

71% of Americans Say Political Correctness Has Silenced Discussions Society Needs to Have; Most Have Views They’re Afraid to Share

Some of these numbers are astonishing in how far people will go to silence free speech. Like this one, from your link:

free-speech-suvery-overview-6.jpg
 
The left has been raised to believe there is no use for any opinion but theirs, and most of their ridiculous partisan arguments are born out of fear because they have no core beliefs to fall back on.

Case in point: The refuse to consider the Uranium One deal as worth of investigation, and pillory anyone who does. Why? Fear. Plain and simple.
 
The thread that's right before this one features a bunch of concervatives denouncing free speech. Thread placement irony is ironic.
 
The left has been raised to believe there is no use for any opinion but theirs, and most of their ridiculous partisan arguments are born out of fear because they have no core beliefs to fall back on.

Case in point: The refuse to consider the Uranium One deal as worth of investigation, and pillory anyone who does. Why? Fear. Plain and simple.

Right. Not the fact that conservamedia and its shills have been lying about it for years.
 
Last edited:
I think the fear of having honest discussions is due to leftist intolerance and their tendency towards violence.

What a surprise, you think everything is the other guy's fault

:roll:
 
The left has been raised to believe there is no use for any opinion but theirs, and most of their ridiculous partisan arguments are born out of fear because they have no core beliefs to fall back on.

Case in point: The refuse to consider the Uranium One deal as worth of investigation, and pillory anyone who does. Why? Fear. Plain and simple.

They've gotten their way for so long they consider it a right. To be fair, there are those on both sides who participate.
 
The thread that's right before this one features a bunch of concervatives denouncing free speech. Thread placement irony is ironic.

You are correct, but that doesn't mean it isn't a problem. It just means this is a problem caused by both sides of the political spectrum, each with their own sacred cows.
 
71% of Americans Say Political Correctness Has Silenced Discussions Society Needs to Have; Most Have Views They’re Afraid to Share

https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/state-free-speech-tolerance-america#37

A little background on your source:
Since breaking into the open in March, the feud had captivated many academic and political onlookers in Washington because of the heavyweight names involved: the Cato Institute, widely cited by both Republicans and Democrats for its libertarian research, pitted against the Koch brothers, two of the country’s biggest financiers of conservative politics.

Charles Koch helped found Cato in 1977, and his family has donated more than $30 million to it over the years. But he and Mr. Crane had a bitter falling-out over management and philosophical differences, and the Kochs had been angling for Mr. Crane’s removal for years.

In March, the Kochs, who held two of the four founding “shareholder” seats on Cato’s board, brought their lawsuits to gain control of the seat of another shareholder who died.

Cato’s other leaders said the Kochs’ gambit, if successful, would make it their “mouthpiece” and give the brothers control of the group’s scholarship to advance a conservative political agenda.

https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/25/cato-institute-and-koch-brothers-reach-agreement/

You can look at the wiki for Cato as well. Not saying what they write never has merit, but it's biased.
 
You are correct, but that doesn't mean it isn't a problem. It just means this is a problem caused by both sides of the political spectrum, each with their own sacred cows.

Yep. I'll also point out immigrant control (war on terror) vs gun control.
 
Are you denying the findings?

No, my post offered a caveat. I take what comes from Koch-World with a huge dose of due diligence, that's all. I used to read Cato several times a week. Then I found out who started the outfit and where their money comes from. Might as well be "moveon.org". Cato is corporate plutocrats pretending to be libertarians.
 
Back
Top Bottom