Preying on Women Without Consequence?

Is that the whole point of being a liberal man?

It seems to be the case for a lot of men, and it would explain a lot.

Explaining the Liberal Cesspool

But slow down a moment: why would Weinstein—and the culture of sexual harassment apparently widespread in Democrat-run institutions (like the California state legislature, according to the New York Times this morning)—have remained unchallenged if Hillary was in the White House? Probably for the same reason that Bill Clinton got a pass for his relentless behavior 20 years ago: power is the most important thing to liberals. And if the dignity and safety of a few women have to be sacrificed, well, broken omelets and all that. After all, as we now know, everyone knew about Weinstein. But did nothing about it. And according to Tamblyn, still wouldn’t today if their person was in power.

Click to expand...

One feminist claims that it was Trump's election that stirred this all up -- that women got fed up and decided that they wouldn't put up with this any longer. But it turned out to be Democrats and liberal men who ended up getting exposed as sexual predators more often as a result. (And, anyway, 20 years ago when Trump was talking about grabbing p he was a Democrat, right?)

Weinstein himself said it all. In effect, Give me a pass on this and I'll promise to fight the good fight for the left.

LowDown said:

Is that the whole point of being a liberal man?

It seems to be the case for a lot of men, and it would explain a lot.

Explaining the Liberal Cesspool


One feminist claims that it was Trump's election that stirred this all up -- that women got fed up and decided that they wouldn't put up with this any longer. But it turned out to be Democrats and liberal men who ended up getting exposed as sexual predators more often as a result. (And, anyway, 20 years ago when Trump was talking about grabbing p he was a Democrat, right?)

Weinstein himself said it all. In effect, Give me a pass on this and I'll promise to fight the good fight for the left.

Click to expand...

I don't believe it's fair to group all liberals, the same that it's not fair to group all republicans or independents.

anyway, 20 years ago when Trump was talking about grabbing p he was a Democrat, right?

Click to expand...

Hell with what he WAS then, you guys still voted for him NOW.

That shows how gullible and easily conned the Republicans who voted for a ***** grabbing Democrat are.. Puts them in a worse light then Trump himself.

holbritter said:

I don't believe it's fair to group all liberals, the same that it's not fair to group all republicans or independents.

Click to expand...

We shouldn't, no.
However when they feel so inclined to lump everyone that isn't so in tune with their current form of group think, into the usual bracket. We should be willing to call them all out for what is transpiring, more so for those that are the elite liberals. The rich & powerful that decided to brow beat everyone, whenever they got the chance to. Just because someone has the right to think differently, does not protect them from persecution, but persecution "when even deserved" has its limits.

I just worry for the people who are getting caught up in this whole #metoo business. There are going to be some innocent people getting their lives ruined over perceived sleights.

Which unfortunately I believe is another fallout associated with the liberal mindset, but that is a discussion for another thread.

LowDown said:

Is that the whole point of being a liberal man? It seems to be the case for a lot of men, and it would explain a lot. One feminist claims that it was Trump's election that stirred this all up -- that women got fed up and decided that they wouldn't put up with this any longer. But it turned out to be Democrats and liberal men who ended up getting exposed as sexual predators more often as a result. (And, anyway, 20 years ago when Trump was talking about grabbing p he was a Democrat, right?) Weinstein himself said it all. In effect, Give me a pass on this and I'll promise to fight the good fight for the left.

Click to expand...

Wow I just learned something- Roger Ailes and Pat no spin Buchanan are LIBERALS... :shock:

Instead of attempting to deny the truth and attempt a partisan smear, yeah we are all surprised you did this :roll:

How about the rich, powerful and or well connected do feel above the law and moral constraints. Be they a Montana politician in airport bathrooms, a speaker of the house and gay young men- or a congress man visiting the DC madam... there are no party lines when it comes to grabbing women by the genitals... eace

LowDown said:

Is that the whole point of being a liberal man?

It seems to be the case for a lot of men, and it would explain a lot.

Explaining the Liberal Cesspool


One feminist claims that it was Trump's election that stirred this all up -- that women got fed up and decided that they wouldn't put up with this any longer. But it turned out to be Democrats and liberal men who ended up getting exposed as sexual predators more often as a result. (And, anyway, 20 years ago when Trump was talking about grabbing p he was a Democrat, right?)

Weinstein himself said it all. In effect, Give me a pass on this and I'll promise to fight the good fight for the left.

Click to expand...

Having been female my whole life, I have some experience with this issue. Politics is irrelevant. Sexual harassers come in all political persuasions. They tend to be young, but some aren't. They can be married or single, good looking or ugly, thin or fat. I've never been sexually harassed by a female though. The best thing about being over 60 is that it hasn't happened to me in quite a while. :doh

I am literally lmao at this thread. LowDown, you do post some gems....thanks for keeping the "cesspool" entertained, I love ya buddy... :lamo

It's a male thing. Predominately. You find women doing it--particularly "butch" lesbian women doing it to other women--but I seriously doubt at the rate of men.

But then some of this comes down to the subjectives of "sexual harassment." While I do believe it true wealthy, or influential men, or men of high status use these things to secure sexual favors for themselves, I think it also true that a woman only feels "sexually harassed" if she's not into the guy.

Men are also men (biologically) whether they are homosexual or heterosexual. All men tend to think with their penis. That is why research conducted years ago found homosexual men are sexually promiscuous by leaps and bounds above heterosexual men. Not because heterosexual men would not be as promiscuous given their choice and ability (ability to be so), but rather because homosexual men have men to have sex with. Whereas heterosexual men have women--and women are the breaks on a man's penis and ability just randomly screw all over the place.

It's easy for women to have sex with men, even if the women are obese and look like they got beat with the ugly stick and they are dirt poor. Alpha males might turn them down--because they can always bang Hollywood actresses--the best looking among them--left and right. Or they can bang the best looking local women chasing after them, or who would be honored to be screwed by them, left and right.

But your beta and omega males will have sex of some form with obese, poor, ugly women. All she has to do is walk into a bar and announce, "I want to blow someone." A number of dude's eyes will get big and they'll be raising their hands. :lol:

That's men. Try walking into a room full of women and announcing something similar if you are a man. :lol: The women will chase you out outraged and disgusted probably.

I have an aunt of severed in the US Army. According to her, men routinely sexually harassed women, even raped women in the Army but she even saw butch lesbian women sexually harassing other women. She knew of some women that got raped by the butch lesbians. That's what she told me at least.

How dumb does someone have to be to think sexual harassment is a liberal issue.

Remember... anything sexual is only ever harmful, screws children up for life, breaks the minds of a woman for life if it is carried out be men.

When it is done by women it is, girls just being strong girls, and "Get over it dude! It's only sex! :roll:"

These same women floating or taping their balloon dildos around a residential neighborhood, having a blast, would be on Dateline with tears rolling down their cheeks recounting the trauma (and fears and nightmares they still have) they experienced waking up to find a balloon dildo taped to their window by male construction workers building a house for Trump. And if you think I'm saying I would believe the women that they are traumatized, then you are wrong.

Both Republican men and Democratic men are "Captain Save a h__." And both of them sexually harass women, that are mothers (not merely single), on the job if they can get away with it as their boss, and in so many ways let the women know they will get fired (they are mothers with children to support) if they don't give in sexually. But they turn right back around and publicly bemoan how terribly women are treated and exploited for sex.




https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/airbnb-new-orleans-housing_us_59f33054e4b03cd20b811699

The women tied inflatables shaped like penises to the front of the house, perhaps not realizing that the neighbors ― families and other longtime residents ― might mind.

“My oldest son woke up and there was an inflatable dildo taped to the house next door and I was like, ‘We’re out of here,’” said Christian Rhodes, a 36-year-old lawyer whose clients include the Greater New Orleans Hotel & Lodging Association and Uber.

Click to expand...

FastPace said:

But then some of this comes down to the subjectives of "sexual harassment." While I do believe it true wealthy, or influential men, or men of high status use these things to secure sexual favors for themselves, I think it also true that a woman only feels "sexually harassed" if she's not into the guy.

Click to expand...

Or if she didn't receive the thing she was after by having sex with that man.