• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

SJW laments racist Weinstine didn't rape women of color...

Mr Person said:
This literally has no relevant relation to my post.

Clinton was not accused of sexually assaulting her. The interactions were consensual.
Click to expand...

Was there scientific evidence (DNA evidence) that Bill Clinton was dishonest about not having sexual activity with Monica L?



The thread and my post included were all about accusations of NON-consensual sexual conduct, aka, sexual assault. Relatedly, about the vast number of complaints against Trump vs. against Clinton, and the hypocrisy of people raging about Clinton but defending Trump.

Meanwhile the thread, my post included, has been about accusations of sexual assault against Trump and Clinton, relatedly, about the hypocrisy of people who act like Clinton is guilty while defending Trump.



Also, why do people think that using "so, you're saying..." or "so, you're suggesting" is a good way of putting words in people's mouths? I said what I said. It's there. If you misrepresent it, it's obvious that you did misrepresent it.
Click to expand...


I dodn't read all the posts in thread, so, I didn't know what the full context of your reply was about.

Yeah, Bill Clinton was not accused of raping Monica L. (Frankly, I don't care what the two did, and in such cases I would have preferred "omerta" among the White House and reporters, but the "omerta" days are gone to Jerry Springer days).

I also don't really care bout Weiner's naked photos or penis photos sent to women or whatever. Not really my business. Was it *morally* wrong? Yeah, so was Bill Clinton's extra-marital affair. But hell... sexual sin is wide spread and normal among people. The sexually pure and saintly are the most rare--and in that sense the "odd" ones.

But President lie. Cops lie. Women like Hillary running for the Presidency lie. People lie.

As for Trump I have no idea what they guy's sexual history is nor do I care all that much. I care about as much as I care about Obama having been likely our 2nd bisexual President (which I think he probably was). And I don't trust a lot of women. That does not mean I don't trust any ever. It just is to say I have been around a lot of women that lie. And women will lie about some sexual harassment or rape. So, I don't believe every woman that claims it.

Ultimately my thing is this with claims its a known fact Trump raped women: is there scientific evidence for this? Like his semen obtained in a rape kit or something?

If not... then this is what I believe about people. If someone hates someone they will believe any negative things said against that person. If someone likes a person a bunch then they will never believe anything negative about a person. Generally that is the case.
 
FastPace said:
Was there scientific evidence (DNA evidence) that Bill Clinton was dishonest about not having sexual activity with Monica L?

I dodn't read all the posts in thread, so, I didn't know what the full context of your reply was about.

Yeah, Bill Clinton was not accused of raping Monica L. (Frankly, I don't care what the two did, and in such cases I would have preferred "omerta" among the White House and reporters, but the "omerta" days are gone to Jerry Springer days).

I also don't really care bout Weiner's naked photos or penis photos sent to women or whatever. Not really my business. Was it *morally* wrong? Yeah, so was Bill Clinton's extra-marital affair. But hell... sexual sin is wide spread and normal among people. The sexually pure and saintly are the most rare--and in that sense the "odd" ones.

But President lie. Cops lie. Women like Hillary running for the Presidency lie. People lie.

As for Trump I have no idea what they guy's sexual history is nor do I care all that much. I care about as much as I care about Obama having been likely our 2nd bisexual President (which I think he probably was). And I don't trust a lot of women. That does not mean I don't trust any ever. It just is to say I have been around a lot of women that lie. And women will lie about some sexual harassment or rape. So, I don't believe every woman that claims it.

Ultimately my thing is this with claims its a known fact Trump raped women: is there scientific evidence for this? Like his semen obtained in a rape kit or something?

If not... then this is what I believe about people. If someone hates someone they will believe any negative things said against that person. If someone likes a person a bunch then they will never believe anything negative about a person. Generally that is the case.
Click to expand...



Well, you were responding to one of those posts that really does require you to do some reading of the thread. Your respond just doesn't line up with anything that was going on in the thread or anything I was saying in the post.
 
MrShangles said:
You must use CNN for credible news .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Nah, I prefer Infowars and whatever sleazeball source of information I can find. /snark
 
Mr Person said:
Well, you were responding to one of those posts that really does require you to do some reading of the thread. Your respond just doesn't line up with anything that was going on in the thread or anything I was saying in the post.
Click to expand...

Okay, fair enough. My bad.
 
MrShangles said:
What sex predator in white house are you talking about.
You can’t be referring to Trumps statement about if your famous you COULD grab them by the *****. I know that couldn’t be considered a sex predator could it? News Flash, most men talk like that if women aren’t around.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Transcript:

Unidentified voice: She used to be great. She’s still very beautiful.

Trump: I moved on her actually. You know she was down on Palm Beach. I moved on her and I failed. I’ll admit it. I did try and **** her. She was married.

Unidentified voice: That’s huge news there.

Trump: No, no. Nancy. No this was— And I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping. She wanted to get some furniture. I said, ‘I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.’ I took her out furniture– I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.

Yeah, SUCH an upstanding example of manhood y'all elected to the White House. Gee, shouldn't we all want our sons to grow up to be just like him?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom