• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox Should Never Lecture America Again!

Manc Skipper said:
Following the departure of ailes and co. It's Billo's turn.

In January this year, he agreed a $32M harassment settlement days before Fox knowingly signed his new contract.

Fox signed O'Reilly again knowing of new harassment settlement: report | Reuters
Click to expand...

And a few months after he signed a larger contract.
To them it was money and ratings over what is right.
But Fox is not the only Corp that is guilty of treating these predators gently.
Non consensual sex- just a hairsbreadth away from rape.
IMHO- It is rape - but lawyers will disagree.
 
What’s the big deal about O’Reilly? He’s not running for office, and is a civilian.

I’ll see your O’Reilly, and raise you one FBI brokering a money transfer from Russia to the Clinton Foundation, in exchange for 20% rights of the nations uranium supply.
 
The made a big stink about Harvey Weinstein. Really WTF. The Fox News males have lived by Trumps motto....We can do whatever we want we can grab the m by the Putang if ya want. Yes they should be the news agency telling Dems to give money back. Really then they can give back all of the paychecks that Roger Aass-els....signed...LOL...Hypocrites till the last. Its only a problem when a Dem does it ...LMAO
 
chuckiechan said:
What’s the big deal about O’Reilly? He’s not running for office, and is a civilian.

I’ll see your O’Reilly, and raise you one FBI brokering a money transfer from Russia to the Clinton Foundation, in exchange for 20% rights of the nations uranium supply.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure it has something to do with the big stink Fox News made over Weinstein while ignoring their own problems.
 
chuckiechan said:
I guess this is just an attempt to hyjack the news cycle to protect a Democrat donor.
Click to expand...

If you worked with and for serial sexual harassers and acted like the Weinstein story was massive news you are a hypocrite. That's all this thread is about.
 
MrPeanut said:
If you worked with and for serial sexual harassers and acted like the Weinstein story was massive news you are a hypocrite. That's all this thread is about.
Click to expand...

Why are you conflating Fox, O’Reilly, and Weinstein in the first place?

It seems you are hoping subtraction equals zero, when in reality you have addition - two outrageous serial offenders.
 
Last edited:
chuckiechan said:
Why are you conflating Fox, O’Reilly, and Weinstein in the first place?

It seems you are hoping subtraction equals zero, when in reality you have addition - two outrageous serial offenders.
Click to expand...

I have no idea what you are trying to get at. Fox didn't make a big deal out of Ailes or O'Reilly. This whole thread is about how hypocritical it is that Fox is hammering Weinstein while it didn't hammer the other two. All of them suck.
 
Manc Skipper said:
Following the departure of ailes and co. It's Billo's turn.

In January this year, he agreed a $32M harassment settlement days before Fox knowingly signed his new contract.

Fox signed O'Reilly again knowing of new harassment settlement: report | Reuters
Click to expand...

Does a harassment claim by some person mean you shouldn't employ a person you think will do a good job? I mean, it's only a claim, isn't it. The only thing one might want to criticise is the business acuman in a society traditionally hysterical about sex and presently caught in a further bout of bigotry to take the risk.
 
JANFU said:
And a few months after he signed a larger contract.
To them it was money and ratings over what is right.
But Fox is not the only Corp that is guilty of treating these predators gently.
Non consensual sex- just a hairsbreadth away from rape.
IMHO- It is rape - but lawyers will disagree.
Click to expand...

Considering the pot of gold and I'm not saying the fellow is necessarily innocent, but the motivational structure sounds more predatory one the side of the femal. She has practically nothing to lose but can net $32M before tax by subtly tweaking the truth.
 
When your ***** grabber in Chief is in the White House. Any Conservative that voted for that person needs to STFU. They have lost all business to lecture anyone on morality.
 
Fraggle Rock said:
When your ***** grabber in Chief is in the White House. Any Conservative that voted for that person needs to STFU. They have lost all business to lecture anyone on morality.
Click to expand...

I see. So now that liberals have their own '***** grabber' no one can lecture anyone about anything. Is that what you are saying?
 
Anything......no not anything......but because of a donors sexual escapades yes. When you vote for a man that says on tape he can do anything to a woman because he is famous including grabbing them by the "Garfield". Well then you need to stop your crocodile tears for a person that no one voted for and no one really knew was a sexual predator till now. We still know the POTUS is one and it did not stop you from voting for him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom