• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The fraud of "warmest condolences" while doing nothing

H

haymarket

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
120,954
Reaction score
28,531
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
This is beyond superb. It hits the nail firmly on the head expressing the beliefs of millions upon millions upon millions of Americans following the Vegas slaughter enabled by the far right wing NRA and its apologists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBQcpRE4JS8

And it features a hated enemy of the right wing as a bonus making it twice as satisfying. But he is right.

And it is getting lots of national coverage and finding an audience of receptive and sympathetic Americans who have had enough of the tail wagging the dog.

Keith Olbermann: The NRA is 'a terrorist organization' | TheHill

Keith Olbermann: NRA should be branded 'a terrorist organization'
 
Keith Olbermann??? No thanks.
 
haymarket said:
This is beyond superb. It hits the nail firmly on the head expressing the beliefs of millions upon millions upon millions of Americans following the Vegas slaughter enabled by the far right wing NRA and its apologists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBQcpRE4JS8

And it features a hated enemy of the right wing as a bonus making it twice as satisfying. But he is right.

And it is getting lots of national coverage and finding an audience of receptive and sympathetic Americans who have had enough of the tail wagging the dog.

Keith Olbermann: The NRA is 'a terrorist organization' | TheHill

Keith Olbermann: NRA should be branded 'a terrorist organization'
Click to expand...

"Keep and bear … do not mean ‘own,’ period,” Olbermann said. “The Second Amendment is gun-control from an era where the gun was a musket, and not an automatic killing machine that could be bought an stashed on the 32nd floor of a hotel in order to shoot people 500 at a time.”
Click to expand...

This moron should stop and think very carefully about his assertion that only technology of the time is afforded constitutional protection. Perhaps he should be told by the friends of the NRA in government to cease and desist using video, and anything else beyond what was available in 1789, since it is so clearly not protected by the 1A.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
This moron should stop and think very carefully about his assertion that only technology of the time is afforded constitutional protection. Perhaps he should be told by the friends of the NRA in government to cease and desist using video, and anything else beyond what was available in 1789, since it is so clearly not protected by the 1A.
Click to expand...

Touche’
 
haymarket said:
This is beyond superb. It hits the nail firmly on the head expressing the beliefs of millions upon millions upon millions of Americans following the Vegas slaughter enabled by the far right wing NRA and its apologists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBQcpRE4JS8

And it features a hated enemy of the right wing as a bonus making it twice as satisfying. But he is right.

And it is getting lots of national coverage and finding an audience of receptive and sympathetic Americans who have had enough of the tail wagging the dog.

Keith Olbermann: The NRA is 'a terrorist organization' | TheHill

Keith Olbermann: NRA should be branded 'a terrorist organization'
Click to expand...





typical liberal scumbag, shows the mindset of the alt-left. if you disagree with them you should be labeled a terrorist. What if he got his way and they would be labeled a terrorist, what then? swat raids? use guns to compel them to submit?
 
MaggieD said:
Touche’
Click to expand...

His assertion that the 2A (or the rest of the BoR) is "people control" rather than "government control" is so far off the mark as to border on insanity.

Keep and bear … do not mean ‘own,’ period,” Olbermann said. “The Second Amendment is gun-control from an era where the gun was a musket, and not an automatic killing machine that could be bought an stashed on the 32nd floor of a hotel in order to shoot people 500 at a time.”
Click to expand...
 
haymarket said:
... enabled by the far right wing NRA and its apologists.
...The NRA is 'a terrorist organization' | TheHill
....Keith Olbermann: NRA should be branded 'a terrorist organization'
Click to expand...

Haymarket is the boy who cried Nazi!

 
ReverendHellh0und said:
typical liberal scumbag, shows the mindset of the alt-left. if you disagree with them you should be labeled a terrorist. What if he got his way and they would be labeled a terrorist, what then? swat raids? use guns to compel them to submit?
Click to expand...

but there are millions and millions and millions of Americans that agree with him... LOL
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
typical liberal scumbag, shows the mindset of the alt-left. if you disagree with them you should be labeled a terrorist. What if he got his way and they would be labeled a terrorist, what then? swat raids? use guns to compel them to submit?
Click to expand...

Gosh, I just listened to the whole vid, and nowhere did he make the claim you're attributing to him.

Shows the mindset of the pathologically dishonest.
 
Cable said:
but there are millions and millions and millions of Americans that agree with him... LOL
Click to expand...

Yet, not enough millions to get the constitution ignored - for now.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Gosh, I just listened to the whole vid, and nowhere did he make the claim you're attributing to him.

Shows the mindset of the pathologically dishonest.
Click to expand...



Did you read the next two links? you should, then show us all how much integrity you have by apologizing for your misguided personal attack.


Watch as you don't now. I won't hold my breath.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Did you read the next two links? you should, then show us all how much integrity you have by apologizing for your misguided personal attack.


Watch as you don't now. I won't hold my breath.
Click to expand...

Indeed I did! They don't support your assertion.

Shows the mindset of the pathologically dishonest.
 
Cable said:
Can't we all just get along?
Click to expand...



he's just got a mouth on him. The titles of the article literally say what I stated, he's besides himself trying to attack me for whatever reason. pay him no mind.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
The titles of the articles literally do.


U mad, bro?
Click to expand...

No, they literally don't. You made a very specific claim and they don't support it.

Irony: being dishonest about one's own dishonesty.

Never made about forcing you to run from your own posts, bra.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
This moron should stop and think very carefully about his assertion that only technology of the time is afforded constitutional protection. Perhaps he should be told by the friends of the NRA in government to cease and desist using video, and anything else beyond what was available in 1789, since it is so clearly not protected by the 1A.
Click to expand...

Welfare programs didn't exist in 1789, either.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
No, they literally don't, nor can you cite where they do, as usual.

Irony: being dishonest about one's own dishonesty.

Never made about forcing you to run from your own posts, bra.
Click to expand...





:lol:


Keith Olbermann: The NRA is 'a terrorist organization' | TheHill

"Keith Olbermann rips the National Rifle Association (NRA) in a new video, calling the gun rights group “a terrorist organization.”

Olbermann said on his GQ show “The Resistance” that the NRA enables mass shootings like the one that took place in Las Vegas.

He quoted Richard Nixon’s conservative Chief Justice Warren Burger, who said the gun lobby’s interpretation of the Second Amendment is a “fraud on the American people.”

“Keep and bear … do not mean ‘own,’ period,” Olbermann said. “The Second Amendment is gun-control from an era where the gun was a musket, and not an automatic killing machine that could be bought an stashed on the 32nd floor of a hotel in order to shoot people 500 at a time.”"



Your hubris boggles the mind, guy.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Of course we can, even when we're pointing out the pathologically dishonest.
Click to expand...

The articles quote Olbermann calling the NRA a terrorist organization. The pathological dishonesty on display here is by the one who denies this reality.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
:lol:


Keith Olbermann: The NRA is 'a terrorist organization' | TheHill

"Keith Olbermann rips the National Rifle Association (NRA) in a new video, calling the gun rights group “a terrorist organization.”

Olbermann said on his GQ show “The Resistance” that the NRA enables mass shootings like the one that took place in Las Vegas.

He quoted Richard Nixon’s conservative Chief Justice Warren Burger, who said the gun lobby’s interpretation of the Second Amendment is a “fraud on the American people.”

“Keep and bear … do not mean ‘own,’ period,” Olbermann said. “The Second Amendment is gun-control from an era where the gun was a musket, and not an automatic killing machine that could be bought an stashed on the 32nd floor of a hotel in order to shoot people 500 at a time.”"

Your hubris boggles the mind, guy.
Click to expand...

LOL! Yer MORE dishonesty from you? It's like it's your mother's milk.

You claimed: "f you disagree with them you should be labeled a terrorist" but he never actually said or indicated that. There can be plenty of people who disagree with him he isn't and wouldn't label as 'terrorist'. Nor have you shown that to be 'typical' of the 'alt-left', nor can you even demonstrate that the 'alt-left' exists.

Your pathological dishonesty, even of such a incredibly simple thing, is a thing to people.

Still, it's always fun to watch you run away from your own posts. Same old, same old.
 
Fletch said:
The articles quote Olbermann calling the NRA a terrorist organization. The pathological dishonesty on display here is by the one who denies this reality.
Click to expand...

Yes, he did. But that's irrelevant to the claim that I was addressing.

You're really struggling with this. How can I help you?
 
Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! Yer MORE dishonesty from you? It's like it's your mother's milk.

You claimed: "f you disagree with them you should be labeled a terrorist" but he never actually said or indicated that. There can be plenty of people who disagree with him he isn't and wouldn't label as 'terrorist'.

Your pathological dishonesty, even of such a incredibly simple thing, is a thing to people.

Still, it's always fun to watch you run away from your own posts. Same old, same old.
Click to expand...




Moving goal posts now, trying semantics? how pathetic.


Keith Olbermann: NRA should be branded 'a terrorist organization'

"He said groups like the NRA should be "branded for what it is — a terrorist organization."



You want to play literal games, but you have to give off the air of not being intelligent to do so. you are in a conundrum my friend.



bark at me all you want, I know you don't bite. ;)
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Moving goal posts now, trying semantics? how pathetic.
Click to expand...

No, I'm not. I'm just pointing out lies when I see them. How sad that you're not equipped to deal with that.
Keith Olbermann: NRA should be branded 'a terrorist organization'

"He said groups like the NRA should be "branded for what it is — a terrorist organization."



You want to play literal games, but you have to give off the air of not being intelligent to do so. you are in a conundrum my friend.

bark at me all you want, I know you don't bite. ;)
Click to expand...

You claimed: "f you disagree with them you should be labeled a terrorist" but he never actually said or indicated that. There can be plenty of people who disagree with him he isn't and wouldn't label as 'terrorist'. Nor have you shown that to be 'typical' of the 'alt-left', nor can you even demonstrate that the 'alt-left' exists.

What you stated was a lie. You got called out on it. You're now running away from it.

As usual.

I'll cut to the chase: experience shows that you desperately need to have the last word when your bull**** has been dismantled, so go ahead and take it. I've already show how you were dishonest and don't have the fortitude to face that simple fact.

Hope your don't wear your running shoes out.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
No, I'm not. I'm just pointing out lies when I see them. How sad that you're not equipped to deal with that.

You claimed: "f you disagree with them you should be labeled a terrorist" but he never actually said or indicated that. There can be plenty of people who disagree with him he isn't and wouldn't label as 'terrorist'. Nor have you shown that to be 'typical' of the 'alt-left', nor can you even demonstrate that the 'alt-left' exists.

What you stated was a lie. You got called out on it. You're now running away from it.

As usual.

I'll cut to the chase: experience shows that you desperately need to have the last word when your bull**** has been dismantle, so go ahead and take it. I've already show how you were dishonest and don't have the fortitude to face that simple fact.

Hope your don't wear your running shoes out.
Click to expand...




u seem upset. Are you triggered?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom