• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Project Veritas preparing to unleash a new expose on the media.

Grim17 said:
You claim that her words and actions were misrepresented.... Yet you can't point out one thing that she said on that video, that was misinterpreted, or taken out of context.

Until you can do that, you are just blowing smoke.

And btw, here's an excerpt from the AG's report that blows your excuse out of the water:

"Although their story morphed over time, the couple
requested advice from ACORN employees related to Giles’ prostitution business, including
obtaining a mortgage, reporting income and taxes from the illicit business, avoiding law
enforcement scrutiny, smuggling young girls into the country to serve as prostitutes, and
obtaining documentation and voting privileges for them. Woven into the narrative and
conversations were tales of Giles’ flight from an abusive pimp and how the girls could be kept
safe from the pimp, albeit employed as prostitutes. O’Keefe wore a hidden camera and secretly
recorded audio and video of the conversations."​

So the woman was acting out of concern for the girls lives, but the fact that they were still going to be used as prostitutes wasn't a concern.

Like I said, point out her words on the video that were distorted, or taken out of context.

.
Click to expand...

You are so right. Totally right. Spot on.

So what about the employee who knew it was a joke and was portrayed as having no idea?
 
Mustachio said:
You are so right. Totally right. Spot on.
Click to expand...

That's a total cop-out... You just respond that way because you know full well that you can't back up that bogus crap you've been pushing, and want to maintain the ability to continue pushing that BS in the future.

You are as dishonest as the day is long, or put another way... a stereotypical leftist who has to lie to himself and others to justify his beliefs.

Either post the proof, or STFU, because I'm done wasting my time shooting down your phony BS and lame arguments.

.
 
Grim17 said:
That's a total cop-out... You just respond that way because you know full well that you can't back up that bogus crap you've been pushing, and want to maintain the ability to continue pushing that BS in the future.

You are as dishonest as the day is long, or put another way... a stereotypical leftist who has to lie to himself and others to justify his beliefs.

Either post the proof, or STFU, because I'm done wasting my time shooting down your phony BS and lame arguments.

.
Click to expand...

I already responded, then asked you to explain why they showed a woman "cooperating" as though she had no idea what was going on when she was joking around with them about murdering people and a number of other horrible things she hadn't done. To edit all that out and present her as helping them? That's misleading. Phony and lame? No, true.
 
I love how in the face of this whole entire argument Grim has not yet posted the old unedited videos of the ACORN Sting, but he also hasn't posted the damaging new videos that O'Keefe was supposed to have put out by now.
 
Mr Person said:
Is that the same James O'Keefe who put out the fraudulently edited ACORN video and ended up paying $100,000 after he was sued?

Christ, even Brian ****ing Williams is more credible than that turd.
Click to expand...

Shhhhhh!!!!! Some people are so emotionally invested in O'Keefe not being a fraud that they're having a hard time with reality.
 
So the new expose came out, and, uh... I have no idea what this was supposed to be.
 
Mr Person said:
Is that the same James O'Keefe who put out the fraudulently edited ACORN video and ended up paying $100,000 after he was sued?

Christ, even Brian ****ing Williams is more credible than that turd.
Click to expand...

As usual you twist facts and leave out information to assist in your storytelling
 
Renae said:
As usual you twist facts and leave out information to assist in your storytelling
Click to expand...

No, that's literally what O'Keefe is famous for.
 
Renae said:
As usual you twist facts and leave out information to assist in your storytelling
Click to expand...

"As usual you...."

Instead of attacking me, why don't you show how I twisted facts?






He has a long history of creating deceptive videos and of getting in various trouble while doing so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_O'Keefe

Though, I suppose, you could always just call the wikipedia article, with its one hundred and sixty three footnotes, complete with active links to every single source relied upon "fake news".

:shrug:
 
Crovax said:
Seems like the NYT is taking it seriously

The Times Responds to Project Veritas Video - NYTimes.com
Click to expand...

Thanks for posting information on what the actual thread is supposed to be about. Looks like someone is getting fired:

Based on what we’ve seen in the Project Veritas video, it appears that a recent hire in a junior position violated our ethical standards and misrepresented his role. In his role at The Times, he was responsible for posting already published video on other platforms and was never involved in the creation or editing of Times videos. We are reviewing the situation now.
Click to expand...

As of now I'll chalk this up to him being a new employee and won't go so far as saying he is a paid O'Keffe plant...



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom