- Joined
- Mar 30, 2016
- Messages
- 81,814
- Reaction score
- 20,427
- Location
- Chicago
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Ah yes, if we can label anyone a "terrorist" now we can dispose of any legality and do as we wish with them.
Ah look, here comes Clive now:
https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/C...ent-Nevada-grazing-fees/2014/04/24/id/567441/
What do you suppose the right – or, for that matter, law enforcement officials and the general public – would say about that host and his network? What would you say? Well, say it to Sean Hannity instead. Hannity’s questions to Bundy and extremist Richard Mack seem designed to escalate the “Bundy Ranch” conflict, rather than ameliorate it. No wonder Bundy calls Hannity his “hero.”
Sean Hannity will have blood on his hands: Fox News promotes Cliven Bundy?s war - Salon.com
"The masses" sir are merely we the people. Concentrated corporate wealth and power fears us and as such must control the narrative, that's why they bought up the media once Clinton deregulated the FCC.
Fox News is not state media, and Salon is hardly an unbiased source itself.
And we the people are the ones most harmed by the terrorist thugs who claimed to be fighting for "the masses".