- Joined
- Sep 17, 2013
- Messages
- 48,281
- Reaction score
- 25,273
- Location
- Western NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
I've seen some utterly rancid arguments in my day, but jdog just earned his spot on the Mount Rushmore of bull****.
Another liberal who cannot post a viable argument. That seems to be a quality all liberals share, they are unable to form any kind of intelligent argument to support their position, that in itself speaks volumes about the entire liberal philosophy. It is based on lies.
And another liberal who is totally incapable of intelligent debate. Well you can always scream "racism" as an alternative to being able to articulate a logical position. That seems to be the only thing liberals can do.... Kind of pathetic.
So you are telling me you know absolutely nothing about the history of the KKK. Let me guess.... you went to public school. Right?
After the destruction of the South after the Civil War, the "freed slaves" had no way to support themselves, and as a result many turned to crime. The fact is that there were more able bodied black men after the war than there were white. Many of the families had lost their men, and the women and children were easily victimized. The only support the North gave the South after the war was to allow Carpet Baggers to come and steal whatever had not been burned and stolen by the Union. The people needed protection and formed civilian organizations to combat the crimes being committed against them.
Due to the fact that the South had lost a great deal of its able bodied population and many of the ones who were left were injured they turned to "terror" to equalize their force and to not be slaughtered in their beds as the North was encouraging the blacks to do. A sheet can hide missing limbs and a hood can disguise an old man.
The war only ended in the North, the South was fighting for survival long after the war. Of course your liberal lying educational system will never tell you these truths......
Lol, While I wouldn't care if I was black or white. If I got to pick a race or ethnicity it would be Asian (Japanese in particular). If race was considered fluid like gender (which to me is easier to believe since there are fewer distinctions between races than there are gender) then I would identify as Asian.
Ah. So you are a historical revisionist, too. Apparently, whatever extreme conservative school you went to had no classes in history. That is not surprising as extreme conservatives have never been known to be honest about history, anyway.
I am not sure that I would want to single out extreme conservatives to be less than historically truthful.
There is no such thing as racism. It is a lie perpetrated by the liberal socialists. People are not liked or disliked based on their race, that is the great lie.
What there is though, is "culturalism". Culturalism is the practice of liking, or hating someone based on how they act.
Jews were not a different race than Germans, they are however, and very different culture. The Russians are not a different race than the American's, but they are a different culture. The Sunni and Shiite are not different races but they are different cultures.
The reason "racism" is constantly drummed into the psyche by the left is the concept that all propagandists understand that to create a problem which cannot be solved, it must contain a lie.
It is the lie within the problem which makes the issue unresolvable and gives the propagandist an issue it can exploit and divide the people.
You see, a person cannot change the color of their skin, or their ancestry, but they can change their behaviors. That is why the lie of racism must be perpetuated. If people understood that the real problem was behavior and not skin color, the issues could be resolved and that would not serve the purposes of the liberals who have the agenda of dividing the people and creating hate.
I am not sure that I would want to single out extreme conservatives to be less than historically truthful.
If you are Black but feel Asian? I feel you should have the same right to say you are Asian as a boy that feels he is a she; get the fib stamped into your passport, have people forced to tell it too. It's a weird world so why not make it even more freaky?
Horribly incorrect, the correct answer is racism exists and every person on earth is racist, just not against the same races and some people deny it. racism itself is often hidden away, and which race any person may hate is hidden.
The only real determination is people who act on their racist sub conscience and those who do not and choose to live in harmony.
I'm sure you wouldn't. :roll:
What you're describing is known as "ethnocentrism," but that doesn't account for all the bigotry in the world. Ethnocentrism rises from differences in culture, but it can't explain why parents don't want their white daughter marrying a black man she met in church. Racism is real. It's not nearly a harmful or widespread as it once was, but it is real.
The Sunni/Shia thing is a clash of religious tenets, and the Hitler/Jew thing was ethnocentrism that built over the decades, amplified by the results of WWI.
You are correct that often other reasons exist, and that some are cultural, but racism is still out there.
I singled them out IN THIS CASE, which is entirely accurate.
I have a question for you. If there is no racism and it is only about culture. I have a friend that is culturally black, by that I mean outside of myself and his family he only associates with black people, is married to a black woman, his speech and the way he dresses are more like that of a black person than that of a typical white person, etc. The only thing that identifies him as a white person is the color of his skin. Is he white or black?
There is no such thing as racism. It is a lie perpetrated by the liberal socialists. People are not liked or disliked based on their race, that is the great lie.
What there is though, is "culturalism". Culturalism is the practice of liking, or hating someone based on how they act.
Jews were not a different race than Germans, they are however, and very different culture. The Russians are not a different race than the American's, but they are a different culture. The Sunni and Shiite are not different races but they are different cultures.
The reason "racism" is constantly drummed into the psyche by the left is the concept that all propagandists understand that to create a problem which cannot be solved, it must contain a lie.
It is the lie within the problem which makes the issue unresolvable and gives the propagandist an issue it can exploit and divide the people.
You see, a person cannot change the color of their skin, or their ancestry, but they can change their behaviors. That is why the lie of racism must be perpetuated. If people understood that the real problem was behavior and not skin color, the issues could be resolved and that would not serve the purposes of the liberals who have the agenda of dividing the people and creating hate.
But it can explain why parents might not want their daughter marrying a man of a different race. Ethnocentrism confuses race with culture.
I have a question for you. If there is no racism and it is only about culture. I have a friend that is culturally black, by that I mean outside of myself and his family he only associates with black people, is married to a black woman, his speech and the way he dresses are more like that of a black person than that of a typical white person, etc. The only thing that identifies him as a white person is the color of his skin. Is he white or black?
On the other hand, the left is as prone to revisionism as the right in my experience.
no some people hate other people based on race but imagined behaviors get added in to