- Joined
- Jan 5, 2017
- Messages
- 1,017
- Reaction score
- 515
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Fascinating, you state, "Households of Central American and Mexican parentage use social programs higher than any other foreign immigrant population (particularly if they're illegal)" and then provide a link to support your argument that states...
" it is clear that the overwhelming majority of immigrant households using welfare are headed by legal immigrants."
Looks like you don't need me to present an opposition to your argument, you've got that covered.
You state...
"The fact of the matter is that we must retain a standard of law. At the end of the day, a crime is a crime."
You're giving new meaning to being a dreamer, how can we retain something we've never had?
You didn't read the entire article then.
legal immigrant households have higher welfare use than native households for cash, food, and Medicaid, while illegal immigrant households have higher use than natives for food and Medicaid, but lower use for cash and housing programs.
They also mention NUMEROUS times that welfare statistics for illegal immigrants may be grossly underestimated due to the questionable amount of illegal immigrants in the country.
Last edited: