• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Antifa/Neo Nazi/KKK Solution [W:88]

That is your answer when told to condemn the Alt Right?

Yes, you are Alt Right and you love the fascists.

So does revhellhound. He and blackjack are, at best, fascist alt right symps.




Sorry to see you suspended. it's too bad because this is a prime example of how dishonest and abhorrent the left is behaving.



Anyone who disagrees with far left politics is labled "alt-right" aka a ****ing "nazi", "white nationalist", "racist". meanwhile there are 26 pages of me calling the alt-right, nazis, white nationalists, and racists dirtbags and scum. Often in DIRECT response to you. but instead of accepting this, without any evidence you call me a racist, and fascists, "symps" [sic]


So lets think about this for a moment. You are some white d00d, who is literally using blacks and minorities as a bat in debate, cheapening the very real issue of racism, to call out people who openly and proudly denounce racism, and statism (I'm very libertarian), as fascist nazis. think about that for a moment, who has the abhorrent position, the "fascist" one if you like. The people who speak thier mind, openly denounce actual racism, or the guy who calls anyone that disagrees with them a racist with not a shred of evidence that that person holds racist views.

It's a pathetic display, but when your abhorrent thinking becomes violence, Ala ANTIFA it becomes fascist and dangerous.


Thank you for giving me this opportunity to wax logic on the illogical.
 
Your solution doesn't help because the question is: Is Antifa just as bad as Nazis/KKK?

The rational answer is NO. Period.

I don't support Antifa. I don't believe in violence. I am not a socialist or anarchist.

I think a better question is if you were forced to either marry an Antifa member, a Nazi, or a KKK member who would you marry? That's an easy question. Antifa is just not on the same level of evil as Nazis and KKK members.

Only extreme conservative nutjobs equate socialism with Nazis. That's party due to ignorance about the difference between socialism and the Soviet Union authoritarian state.

You seem to have a sliding scale of bad.

Most people understand bad is bad, they don't approve of one group because it isn't as bad as another.
 
Antifa is a problem, but not nearly the danger of the Alt Right. Next.

So you have a sliding scale of bad as well.

Not good at all.
 
Really? How many people have they shot or hung or run over or otherwise murdered?

I want numbers. Numbers or retract that one.

And number three for the win.
 
That is what the Alt Right did. An Alt Righty also murdered a women with a car. Sir, your kind will never be allowed to take over America.

And we still don't know why.
 
We all have our rights, blackjack50. We simply can't make others afraid, and when you show up with guns, dogs, helmets, shields, clubs, banners, torches . . . what do you think others will think of you?

Who is afraid of White Separatists marching?

Some people are afraid of dogs. Should dogs be banned because some people are afraid?
 
Who is afraid of White Separatists marching?

Some people are afraid of dogs. Should dogs be banned because some people are afraid?
Not DOGS, certainly... but CATS!...
 
I can solve this stupid debate now. I will do it with a series of questions. And if you answer them all correctly (like most)...then you should have absolutely NO more debates with anyone on this topic EVER unless they fall into the Antifa/KKK/Neonazi section.

So. My brilliant (not really) solution.

1) Do you believe in the views of Nazis/KKK? Do you subscribe to their beliefs? Racism and anti Semitism. Their beliefs. The things that separate them from other political groups.

Your answer should be no if you are a normal person.

Racism is not acceptable in this day and age. It may be legal and it may be their choice, but it should not be something that you as an individual accept. It should not be something you as normal person accept.

2) Do we have a right to say mean and hurtful things? Regardless of how racist and despicable they are. Do we have the right to hate speech?

Your answer should be yes as this is settled case law in America. Period. Here is an example:
https://www.thoughtco.com/hate-speech-cases-721215

I did not read the commentary. Just for the cases. I googled hate speech cases in America. This is NOT an opinion. It is a fact. You can have your own opinions. Not facts.

3) Do you believe that violence is an acceptable response to someone who is espousing hate speech and racial discrimination? Specifically, do you believe this is acceptable when they are remaining NON VIOLENT?

Your answer should be NO.

Violence is not an appropriate response to someone using their right to free speech. You can argue with them till the cows come home. You can try to educate or belittle them. You can counter protest their protest. Dealer's choice. There are plenty examples of the impact of non violence protests. But when you decide that violence is acceptable or tolerable, you are subscribing to a hateful ideology against free speech. And that puts you on the same level, if not lower, than those who were using a non violent method of protest to espouse their views.

All of that being said. You can disagree with any of the above, but you must understand that you are then painting yourself into a pretty bad corner:

1) You support racism?

2) You believe we do not have free speech.

3) You support violence against those who do not agree with you.

Antifa has been showing issues with 2-3, and we have seen examples of 1 and 3 with the KKK and Neo Nazism. None of those should be tolerable. And I would contend that most normal Americans...if questioned...would fall into roughly the same answers for each question 1) No 2) Yes 3) No.

There is room for debate on whether or not you think we should have hate speech laws, and there is room for debate on what the best course of action is in response to both the KKK and neo Nazis as well as antifa. Personally I think ignoring them would be the best (kkk and neo Nazis as antifa is an anarchist counter protest and any time they show up they should be jailed when they resort to violence). At most a simple American flag and silent protest would be amazing (like in Turkey). Or what was done to the westboro baptists on a few occasions.

So. What do you think? If you are able to recognize the other person's response to the 3 questions...would it settle this debate? Would you accept that the other side understands your position? And that they don't believe in the evil you think they do (or you think they are excusing)?

There is no need for hate speech laws, we already have laws in place to deal with speech which incites violence.
 
Your solution is too weak, me I would buil this dome, then put on kkk mask and call all white supremecists there on the internet while using police to block antifa. During the rally leave saying I am getting the next speaker and casually walk out and tell police to step down and tell antifa the dome is unguarded.

As antifa charges the dome I lock the door behind them and tell both groups thunderdome bitches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But but but antifa! They are the true guardians of peace!

But seriously. As funny as your response is...in the real world...we as Americans need to recognize that violence is not the response to disagreement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
There is no need for hate speech laws, we already have laws in place to deal with speech which incites violence.

But said speech must be specific in nature. Some feel we need hate speech laws. We don't. Those are not American and they violate rigjtd.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I was at an anti-Iraq war march in DC 17 or 18 years ago, I guess.. and I was down by the Treasury in the street packed with ardent protestors and walked into a section where, counterintuitively, anti-abortion protestors were screaming pointlessly at the huge crowd passing before them and waving huge sign with pictures of aborted fetuses on them. As if that weren't ENOUGH audio-visual stimulation, both sides of the street were lined with riot police in full riot gear. So I stepped out of line, walked up on the steps with the anti-abortion protestors, and smoked my pipe a little...

While I was standing there I began to notice what appeared to be small gangs of children weaving their way through the crowd. They were all wearing black hoodies and scarves.. and the reason I'd thought they were children was because they were crouched over, holding onto each other's sweatshirts like a Chinee dragon at New Years...

As I watched I realized that they were HIGHLY skilled at this... holding onto each other and weaving like a snake through a crowd so dense it was literally falling over itself. It was fascinating. I assumed they were "anarchists" given the outfits - that's what they were called pre-Trump - but what was riveting was the way they moved through the crowd.. in a crouch, very, very fast.. through a dense crowd of slow-moving anti-war activists.

Over my head there were 4 black helicopters hovering at, perhaps 500 yards up.. Surrounding me were a thousand or more police in full, black, riot gear... and in the crowd there were small "teams" of four hooded, black clothed young men, typically, snaking through the crowd like it wasn't even there.. like a military unit would.. And that's when I figured out who "Antifa" was...
 
Last edited:
It occurs to me that there are very likely TWO Antifas... One, disaffected teens who like to dress up, and one military/police that functions within the other. They are at EVERY protest and march and have been for more than 20 years... They possess high-level military/police skills... someone taught them. And here I sit... an old man.. out of the flow of things... wondering why?

If groups of them learn and practice complex skills by attending every march, every large gathering and participating... one is inclined to think there is a central discipline of some sort... it has a purpose.. It has a purpose and at least SOME of its members are subject to its discipline. That doesn't sound to me like disaffected teens..

The so-called, Nazis, KKK members and white supremacists that are on EVERYONE'S lips just now... those guys were there for the last two thousand years. Clowns... silliness at this point, and NO ONE would want to join their ranks, they're morons, except perhaps prisoner number 2854436 who studied Mein Kamph in Islamic at Attica... Prison... hmmm... a captive audience... A PERFECT place to sow the seeds of radicalism a sophisticated, computerized police state might WANT. If there are GOING to be crazy nutsos out on the streets... they might as well be OUR crazy nutsos, right? It just makes sense...
 
Last edited:
The police/military was guilty of being purely reactionary back during the Vietnam era... Sure, we'd terrorize FBI agents at peace rallies but good GOD, if you could've SEEN them in their little ties and fedoras.. military issue horn-rimmed glasses... But they're not ALL stoopid... EVENTUALLY they would've figured out a way to intercept internal anti-government "movements" at their source... children... How better to anticipate trouble then to be the ones that started it..
 
It occurs to me that there are very likely TWO Antifas... One, disaffected teens who like to dress up, and one military/police that functions within the other. They are at EVERY protest and march and have been for more than 20 years... They possess high-level military/police skills... someone taught them. And here I sit... an old man.. out of the flow of things... wondering why?

If groups of them learn and practice complex skills by attending every march, every large gathering and participating... one is inclined to think there is a central discipline of some sort... it has a purpose.. It has a purpose and at least SOME of its members are subject to its discipline. That doesn't sound to me like disaffected teens..

The so-called, Nazis, KKK members and white supremacists that are on EVERYONE'S lips just now... those guys were there for the last two thousand years. Clowns... silliness at this point, and NO ONE would want to join their ranks, they're morons, except perhaps prisoner number 2854436 who studied Mein Kamph in Islamic at Attica... Prison... hmmm... a captive audience... A PERFECT place to sow the seeds of radicalism a sophisticated, computerized police state might WANT. If there are GOING to be crazy nutsos out on the streets... they might as well be OUR crazy nutsos, right? It just makes sense...





The police/military was guilty of being purely reactionary back during the Vietnam era... Sure, we'd terrorize FBI agents at peace rallies but good GOD, if you could've SEEN them in their little ties and fedoras.. military issue horn-rimmed glasses... But they're not ALL stoopid... EVENTUALLY they would've figured out a way to intercept internal anti-government "movements" at their source... children... How better to anticipate trouble then to be the ones that started it..

What...

IN THE HELL...

Are you talking about?
 
I was at an anti-Iraq war march in DC 17 or 18 years ago, I guess.. and I was down by the Treasury in the street packed with ardent protestors and walked into a section where, counterintuitively, anti-abortion protestors were screaming pointlessly at the huge crowd passing before them and waving huge sign with pictures of aborted fetuses on them. As if that weren't ENOUGH audio-visual stimulation, both sides of the street were lined with riot police in full riot gear. So I stepped out of line, walked up on the steps with the anti-abortion protestors, and smoked my pipe a little...

While I was standing there I began to notice what appeared to be small gangs of children weaving their way through the crowd. They were all wearing black hoodies and scarves.. and the reason I'd thought they were children was because they were crouched over, holding onto each other's sweatshirts like a Chinee dragon at New Years...

As I watched I realized that they were HIGHLY skilled at this... holding onto each other and weaving like a snake through a crowd so dense it was literally falling over itself. It was fascinating. I assumed they were "anarchists" given the outfits - that's what they were called pre-Trump - but what was riveting was the way they moved through the crowd.. in a crouch, very, very fast.. through a dense crowd of slow-moving anti-war activists.

Over my head there were 4 black helicopters hovering at, perhaps 500 yards up.. Surrounding me were a thousand or more police in full, black, riot gear... and in the crowd there were small "teams" of four hooded, black clothed young men, typically, snaking through the crowd like it wasn't even there.. like a military unit would.. And that's when I figured out who Antifa" was...

Dude, we invaded Iraq in 2003. That was only 14 years ago.
 
What...

IN THE HELL...

Are you talking about?

Are you the gatekeeper?... Should I be addressing these thoughts to you directly? I see you're a veteran... I WOULD thank you for your service normally....
 
I suppose... FULL DISCLOSURE... I'm a Buddhist. Yep. Card carrying Buddha-belly rubber... I KNOW what a Bodhisattva is, Senator... The "Sage" part I'll leave to others to decide.
 
I suppose... FULL DISCLOSURE... I'm a Buddhist. Yep. Card carrying Buddha-belly rubber... I KNOW what a Bodhisattva is, Senator... The "Sage" part I'll leave to others to decide.

I am an enlightened soul AND a surfing, sky diving bank robber being chased by the FBI.
 
Back
Top Bottom