• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Nazi Baby' Outrage after ACLU Tweets Photo of White Child

Do You Think The ACLU Should have Apologized?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don't know

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17
  • Poll closed .
Only if you, the People, grant them. :)

If the government removes the rights of racists there are going to be a lot of black people affected.

I don't think that is what you would want.
 
Female is not diversity?

Should a white person never be used in an advertisement ever again?

Female is not diversity any more than male is diversity. I wonder if all these righteous posters on behalf of the image would feel the same if the child in the picture was black. My guess is they wouldn't.
 
Once again right wingers find random ass idiots on twitter to assume the role as spokespersons for all liberals
 
On one hand I know there are a group of black twitter trolls who see racism everywhere they look.
On the other hand, ACLU could have used a much different image to show unity and optimism. No babies needed to fuel a political agenda.

The ACLU wasn't trying to make a political statement with their original Tweet. They were just showing a cute kid wearing a shirt they happen to sell on their website.
The outpouring of hate on Twitter came from thousands of people, I only posted a small sampling of the comments.

After the ACLU apologized and uploading non-white babies wearing their free speech shirt, those pictures got thousands of Likes, and the controversy seemed to die down.

I think it's pathetic to politicize innocent children, and cowardly to make excuses for those that hate a toddler based on her skin & hair color.
 
So sad that it takes a little white kid to make a lot of the members here FINALLY stick up for the ACLU.
Typical.

I'm more interested in sticking up for the little white kid, to be honest. If whites were bashing a black baby for the color of her skin, I'd be pissed about that too. But of course that isn't happening, as it's only acceptable to shame people based on skin color, if they are white.
 
Once again right wingers find random ass idiots on twitter to assume the role as spokespersons for all liberals

'Random ass idiots' who got the ACLU to apologize and change their Tweet of a white baby, to a more acceptable non-white baby.

You aren't too concerned with that however.
 
'Random ass idiots' who got the ACLU to apologize and change their Tweet of a white baby, to a more acceptable non-white baby.

You aren't too concerned with that however.

Is there a reason I should be concerned with a random ass baby photo ****ing tweeted, or any changes to said photo? Why should I give two ****s what "Miss Birdwether" thinks about anything?
 
Is there a reason I should be concerned with a random ass baby photo ****ing tweeted, or any changes to said photo? Why should I give two ****s what "Miss Birdwether" thinks about anything?

ACLU's own followers were the ones to cry racism at the sight of a white baby holding a flag. And, no I don't expect you to care, or care if you care.

See you on the next 'nazis are lurking around every corner' thread. :thumbs:
 
ACLU's own followers were the ones to cry racism at the sight of a white baby holding a flag. And, no I don't expect you to care, or care if you care.

See you on the next 'nazis are lurking around every corner' thread. :thumbs:

The Nazis are a tiny fringe group of racist, violent morons. And they should all be shot.
 
Back
Top Bottom