- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
I think that the states joined and had the power to union.
I've never agreed that secession was legal.
I think that the states joined and had the power to union.
Not after they seceded, until they returned.
So is Al Q.
It was a fight for slavery.
I've never agreed that secession was legal.
The North didn't fight to end slavery.
Again, coddling. We didn't want the scum to rouse more rabble, so we gave them pacifiers. They were foreign troops fighting for slavery against the US.
"Destroying history"? Do you read yourself? Do you see how pathetically hyperbolic that emotional BS reads? Without the statues, there will still be history - accurate history. Not history from a glorified self-serving racist perspective.
They fought for slavery. Their freedom to have slaves. Can you not see the absurdity of your claim?
That's horse crap. Anyone could deny the impetus of a war with platitudes.
30% of white families, 50% in some States.
You totally miss the point.
They did not leave the US and fight against it to preserve slavery. That's the problem. Once you figure that out, perhaps you'll see the issue from an enlightened perspective.
I will gain no enlightenment from you and your attitude, Eco. You travel in darkness on this issue.
For you the old southern gentleman will always be sacrosanct. For me it never was.
It should have been.
many in the SJW camp try to use the confederacy as a symbol of what they currently hate-groups that are patronized or support conservative white Christian middle class males. The SJWs think by attacking the confederacy, they are attacking that group and they try to shame such white males by trying to tie slavery with the GOP. Its a pathetic ploy and its fun watching these ranters spew faux indignation over a movement that was dead over 150 years ago
Sorry Maggie, but it's the Lost Causers who are trying to whitewash history here.And yet they are buried in Arlington National, with a monument no less. The crybabies are the people who continually and wrongly impose their values on others and would destroy history.
Ilya Somin on "Why slippery slope arguments should not stop us from removing Confederate monuments." I can't say it any better myself.The founder of our country owned slaves. Thomas Jefferson. James Madison. 49% of the men at the Constitutional Convention owned slaves. It was the way of the world. Perhaps we should tear up the Constitution because of those dirty rat bastards, eh?
Sorry Maggie, but it's the Lost Causers who are trying to whitewash history here.
The "freedom" the Confederates fought for was the right to enslave other human beings. The declarations of secession for 5 states are here:
https://www.civilwar.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states
Georgia's declaration focuses at length on slavery, and pretty much nothing else. Mississippi stated that "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world." South Carolina was a bit more coy, but eventually got around to their real concern. And so on.
They were not shy about why they seceded, and killed their fellow Americans. Why are you?
Ilya Somin on "Why slippery slope arguments should not stop us from removing Confederate monuments." I can't say it any better myself.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...confederate-monuments/?utm_term=.6ad706b2c100
It has everything to do with it. The statues were placed so that traitorous scum would calm down, feel good about themselves and not cause more trouble. Enough is enough, it's been almost 200 years. The South can face what it was and deal with it. No more statues of hostile foreign troops fighting for slavery. Burn 'em down.
Bull****. This thread isn't about all the Confederate statues or even some folks hurt feelings.
It's about one particular statue that depicts "our better angles" (Lincoln's first inaugural address) taking the weapon from a Confederate soldier and putting the instrument of death and destruction aside. It was a statue based upon, indicative of, and representative of future peace here at home, and the healing of our nation as a whole society.
That you and the villainous Cretans that destroyed it can't understand that, and the fact that you all prefer to maintain your current level of hate, anger, and violent vicious vindictive victimhood at the price of civil peace, says a hell of a lot more about you and they, than you may wish be exposed publically.
I call bull****. Read your own post. You EXPLICITLY stated that they did not fight for slavery, but for "freedom." Fighting for the "right" to enslave others is not fighting for love or freedom.I'm not shy about it. That was one reason. But the reason behind it involved states' rights. tariffs and taxes. So all of the above.
It healed? How fascinating. How did that happen? And when?Our nation healed. That is why 30,000 Confederate soldiers are buried in Arlington National Cemetery. And now the Left is picking off the scab.
I'm not shy about it. That was one reason. But the reason behind it involved states' rights. tariffs and taxes. So all of the above.
Our nation healed. That is why 30,000 Confederate soldiers are buried in Arlington National Cemetery. And now the Left is picking off the scab.
I call bull****. Read your own post. You EXPLICITLY stated that they did not fight for slavery, but for "freedom." Fighting for the "right" to enslave others is not fighting for love or freedom.
It healed? How fascinating. How did that happen? And when?
Was it the Jim Crow laws? State-enforced segregation? Rampant racism and discrimination? The FBI trying to shut down the Civil Rights Movement? The assassination of leaders like Martin Luther King, Jr, Malcolm X, Bobby Kennedy, and Fred Hampton?
Oooh, I know! It happened when a black man became President. I'm sure that fixed the legacy of slavery.
Let's get real. The white supremacists and Lost Causers have never accepted the reality of defeat, or the moral poison they advocate. The white supremacists want to impose their racist and authoritarian views on America, which is why it is important to expose them, let them discredit themselves, and not to give in to their demands.
Arlington nation cemetery was created as an act of revenge againist the lands original owner. The original owner of Arlington? Robert E Lee. The union confiscated Arlington and converted it into a cemetery for union soldiers.
The original owner was his wife. I'd love to see a credible link that claims it was done as an act of revenge.
Union Gen. Montgomery C. Meigs detested Robert E. Lee, who had once been his friend and mentor, even his idol. Once Lee defected to the Confederate side, Meigs turned against him with a vengeance.
Because of that dynamic, today we have Arlington National Cemetery.
As quartermaster general and close adviser to Lincoln, Meigs was often consulted on matters of logistics. When the need arose for a new military cemetery, he recommended Arlington House — which was owned by Lee’s wife, Mary. The military was already occupying the estate, and it was conveniently close to Washington. It also offered the opportunity to make sure the Lees would never want to return to their home.
As the tombstones began to fill the long sloping hill in front of the house, Meigs announced that he was “grimly satisfied.” But then he inflicted one more wound: He ordered that bodies be buried in Mary Lee’s much-prized rose garden, right next to the mansion. When that didn’t happen fast enough, he personally drew the lines for several graves and directed the excavations.
The original owner was his wife. I'd love to see a credible link that claims it was done as an act of revenge.
Not sure you will ever find the secret Lincoln memo saying
"**** Lee let's turn his front yard into a graveyard out of spight."
However even the national park service hints that it was done as a screw you.
Apparently some soldiers were deliberately buried in Mary Lee's rose garden on the order of general Montgomery Meigs.
You're referring to the method GOPs have used for 4 decades to tie DEMs to social issues like abortion that you support. Same with guns and elections. Same with DEM Boogiewomen and elections.
To act like DEMs started this and do it more than GOPs since Nixon's Southern Strategy is .......
And yet, you continue arguing with me. Seems odd.I'm not going to continue arguing with you.
As you wish.But when you say that the south never accepted defeat? I think that's exactly the same way history will view liberals re the last election. Those,statues stood, some of them for over one hundred years and more. This is a new America. Filled with hate and wanting to erase history.
Now you are welcome to the last word.