• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What do Richard Spencer and Bernie Sanders have in Common?

There is no specific political interpetation of an anarchist. An alt-right who wants to overthrow the government, violently, is an anarchist. An alt-left who wants to violently overthrow the government is an anarchist. Figure it out, just once.

You're mistaken and ideological if you're saying one man's violence is better, is more righteous than another man's violence.

Sanders and Spencer are anarchists. Spencer does not believe in diversity and Sanders believes in diversity for every race and culture except the white race and culture.

No they aren't. Anarchists are for NO government at all.

Try posting it again
belief in the abolition of all government and the organization of society on a voluntary, cooperative basis without recourse to force or compulsion.
https://www.google.ca/search?safe=o...sy-ab..5.7.892.6..35i39k1j0i131k1.7MT4lcz-7lE
 
What does socialism (which both Sanders and Spencer profess) have anything to do with anarchists?

Socialism has as much to do with anarchism as republicanism, communism or fascism.
 
Socialism has as much to do with anarchism as republicanism, communism or fascism.
Yes. A anarchist Nazi contingent violently plotted to overthrow the Weimar Republic. Anarchist Reds and Whites violently plotted to overthrow the Tsarist government of Russia. The anarchist Sons of LIberty in Boston plotted to overthrow England's control over the colonies.

When ideology is in play, an anarchist group may be considered sons of liberty or freedom fighters, for examples...or whatever positive spin anyone wishes to put on the anarchy.
 
Last edited:
No they aren't. Anarchists are for NO government at all.

Try posting it again

https://www.google.ca/search?safe=o...sy-ab..5.7.892.6..35i39k1j0i131k1.7MT4lcz-7lE
Anarchists will stop their anarchy when the desired form of government is achieved. The Sons of Liberty stopped their anarchy when America gained its independence. The Communist Party in Russia - the Reds, after destroying the opposition White anarchists, stopped their anarchy when Communism was achieved in Russia. Muslim terrorism will stop when a global caliphate is achieved.
 
Yes. A anarchist Nazi contingent violently plotted to overthrow the Weimar Republic. Anarchist reds and whites violently plotted to overthrow the Tsarist government of Russia. The anarchist Sons of LIberty in Boston plotted to overthrow England's control over the colonies.

An, for example, anarchist group who wishes to violently overthrow the current goverment is suddenly not considered anarchist because their cause is 'just' unless ideology is in play.

Nazis are not anarchists
You really have no clue what you are talking about
Violently revolution doesn't make you an anarchist wanting to permanently remove all forms of govt does.
Nazis were no more anarchist than George Washington
 
Anarchists will stop their anarchy when the desired form of government is achieved. The Sons of Liberty stopped their anarchy when America gained its independence. The Communist Party in Russia - the Reds, after destroying the opposition White anarchists, stopped their anarchy when Communism was achieved in Russia. Muslim terrorism will stop when a global caliphate is achieved.

images.jpg
 
Not stupid but it sure disagrees with your ideology, huh? Alt-right anarchy bad? Alt-left anarchy good? Hum?

Yeah it is because you have no clue what anarchism is you for some bizarre and moronic reason think anarchism is about violence, it isn't it is about NOT having any Govt.
 
*double poof*

lol

I think you just made some convenient terms to fit the end conclusion you want.

No need to think that is exactly what he is trying to do
 
Back
Top Bottom