- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 6,924
- Reaction score
- 1,547
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
LOL!!
I haven't "defended" anyone. I've condemned them BOTH for their hatred, bigotry and violence. I'm not "claiming that the Antifa started all the violence". I'm stating the words of eyewitnesses. And now you want me to provide evidence for a hypothetical situation..."the far-right terrorist would have not attacked the peaceful protesters if it was not for the fighting". I haven't claimed ANYTHING is a "reason for committing a terrorist attack". You are correct...I blame Antifa for starting the violence and not only is there no reason they should violently attack anybody, those actions are against the law. They are criminals. Those Nazis violated NO laws...until they were attacked by Antifa. The Nazis were engaged in a legal rally. btw, this so-called Unite The Right had absolutely NOTHING to do with the murder of anybody during the Holocaust.
sigh...
I've stated my position clearly, calmly...with reason and facts. You now respond with lies about what I've said. I'm done with you.
You are dismissed.
You wrote this in the post I responded to.
That tells me that the recent event would NOT have become a danger to anybody...except that Antifa initiated the violence and created a tragic situation. I suspect, from the results of that report, the FBI and DHS didn't pay much attention to that upcoming rally. And rightfully so. It SHOULD have been handled by local law enforcement...but wasn't.
That I interpret as that you claim that the far right terrorist wouldn't have atacked the peaceful counterprotests if it wasn't for the Anifa violence. Something you don't have any proof for. Also if you use the same logic you can argue that it would have been no violence if the far right extremist hadn't flew the flag of a regime that killed millions of innocent people and started the second world war. Also the only evidence you have provided for that Anifa started the violence and thing would else have been peaceful is a report from an incident on saturday, there in your link the reporter said this "Nobody was intent on peace here from either side. People were intent on causing havoc and causing damage".
This is the link you provided: Reporter McKelway: Police Were Called Off When Violence Started - They Said, "We're Leaving. It's Too Dangerous" (VIDEO)
While you also had far right extremists that provoked, fought and was breaking the law the day before.
Waiting for the white nationalist protestors at the Jefferson Statue was a small contingent of counter-protesters, who circled and linked arms with their backs toward the statue. The “alt-right” marchers surrounded the counter-protesters and continued chanting until a fight broke out.
While waiting for rides at Nameless Field after the march, several of the "alt-right" protesters hurled anti-Semitic, homophobic and misogynistic slurs at several reporters and community members asking them questions. One man asking questions was thrown to the ground and surrounded by marchers after a brief physical altercation.
Torch-wielding white nationalists march at U.Va. | The Cavalier Daily
Two male protesters who said they were also maced, and did not wish to be named, described far-right protesters moving from verbal abuse, to pushing and shoving protesters, to the noxious spray.
“Someone from the alt right maced me right in the face – unprovoked,” said one. “After they maced people they started punching people and hitting them with torches.” Several protesters said a woman using a wheelchair was among those sprayed.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-with-torches-encircles-counter-protest-group
So I don't can understand how you can claim that "You are correct...I blame Antifa for starting the violence and not only is there no reason they should violently attack anybody, those actions are against the law. They are criminals. Those Nazis violated NO laws...until they were attacked by Antifa."
Last edited: