• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Intelligence chairman accuses Obama aides of hundreds of unmasking requests

No, they were unmasked because it was considered necessary to understand the intelligence. Then names got leaked. Are you suggesting the names were unmasked specifically to leak them? There's no evidence for that.

Why were they masked in the first place. Who wears a mask to do normal legal business?
 
No, they were unmasked because it was considered necessary to understand the intelligence. Then names got leaked. Are you suggesting the names were unmasked specifically to leak them? There's no evidence for that.

It was just coincidence then. Right. Why is it you reject the idea that political operatives would misuse such information for political purposes? Is it because they are democrats? Would you be as forgiving if it were Cheney and his henchmen unmasking Obama people in 2008? Of course not. It used to be that you could count on liberals to take a tough stand on privacy matters. Not any more. Go ahead bury your head in the sand. There is another election coming up in 2020 and it will Trump people in charge of the intelligence apparatus.
 
It was just coincidence then. Right. Why is it you reject the idea that political operatives would misuse such information for political purposes? Is it because they are democrats?
There are two parts: the unmasking, which is controlled and must be specially requested, and the leaks.
You are assuming the unmasking was requested specifically in order to leak. I'm not making that assumption. How would you even know you'd want to leak the names?

Would you be as forgiving if it were Cheney and his henchmen unmasking Obama people in 2008? Of course not.
What do you think I'm forgiving?
Unmasking by authorized people isn't an issue. Leaking is a huge issue I certainly don't support. Political parties don't concern me. I didn't vote for GW Bush (though I voted for his dad) and I didn't vote for Obama or Clinton or Trump. So I think you're projecting your bias in me.
 
Back
Top Bottom