- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 6,968
- Reaction score
- 1,563
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
He Who Must Not Be Named feeds of people talking about and mention his name. He also loves it then people talk about his tweets or his speeches. Also as Stephen Fry says that you shouldn’t play the best draw in chess but the draw the opponent least wants you to play.
So maybe the best thing is to call him, He Who Must Not Be Named and maybe talk about the policies and laws he signs, plan or want to implement. Then it comes to the investigation against He Who Should the Named you can maybe let it have it course. There you ignore He Who Should Be Named comments and only focused on his action both now and before the investigation and discuss only real development in the case.
Also for every time you talk about He Who Must Not Be Named you maybe should also talk about the policies ideas, vision and strategy you like for a better society. Like for example I believe that the people have real power if people from different backgrounds and beliefs talk to each other and discover they have the same problems and solutions. Also, even if people have totally different opinions on many issues and vote for different politicians people can still have issues their they believe the same thing and together can try to create change.
There creating networks can be a good idea that people and organizations that can be very different come together to work on issues their it is possible to have common goals.
Sidenote calling him, He Who Must Not Be Named is probablt not a good idea. Just felt nice to start a thread about the crazy phenomenon He Who Must Not Be Named is, without mention his name.
So maybe the best thing is to call him, He Who Must Not Be Named and maybe talk about the policies and laws he signs, plan or want to implement. Then it comes to the investigation against He Who Should the Named you can maybe let it have it course. There you ignore He Who Should Be Named comments and only focused on his action both now and before the investigation and discuss only real development in the case.
Also for every time you talk about He Who Must Not Be Named you maybe should also talk about the policies ideas, vision and strategy you like for a better society. Like for example I believe that the people have real power if people from different backgrounds and beliefs talk to each other and discover they have the same problems and solutions. Also, even if people have totally different opinions on many issues and vote for different politicians people can still have issues their they believe the same thing and together can try to create change.
There creating networks can be a good idea that people and organizations that can be very different come together to work on issues their it is possible to have common goals.
Sidenote calling him, He Who Must Not Be Named is probablt not a good idea. Just felt nice to start a thread about the crazy phenomenon He Who Must Not Be Named is, without mention his name.
