• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How Deep into the GOP Does this Russian Thing Go?

eohrnberger said:
Alleged crimes, as there has been no criminality proven, as of yet, doubtful that there ever will be, as you've posted, the Democratic strategy here is to politically assassinate by conviction in the court of public opinion. Turnabout being fair play, I'd suspect the same to the next Democrat president elected.

"voters make a better choice in 2018"
Rather arrogant of the left to believe that voters didn't make the best choice given the options presented. I think what you are saying is that you saying is the the voters need to vote how you want them to vote. Let's hope that the voters continue their independence streak and continue to disappoint you and the left.

Where the Democrat party has gone, the hard far left, The Democratic tactic of intersectionality, is not a good path for the nation. Seems the voters have realized this, and have voted accordingly. The hope would be that they continue to do so.
Click to expand...

lol...yeah, keep making excuses for collusion with Russia and money laundering. I love it. I always knew the Right's patriotism and claim to be for the rule of law was just all talk. Affirmation is nice
 
calamity said:
lol...yeah, keep making excuses for collusion and money laundering. I love it.
Click to expand...

Where's your proof or evidence of this?

Empty claims are just that, empty claims.

If there's collusion with the Russians, its far more on the Democrat's side, from 'I'll have more flexibility after my election', to the Pay to Play Uranium One deal and $1/2M speech in Moscow.

If you want to hold political leaders to that standard, that's fine, but that standard need apply to all of them or none of them. Can't just hold one side to that standard and let the other side get away with just about anything. That's just partisan hackery, which you seem to indulge in quite a bit.
 
eohrnberger said:
Where's your proof or evidence of this?

Empty claims are just that, empty claims.

If there's collusion with the Russians, its far more on the Democrat's side, from 'I'll have more flexibility after my election', to the Pay to Play Uranium One deal and $1/2M speech in Moscow.

If you want to hold political leaders to that standard, that's fine, but that standard need apply to all of them or none of them. Can't just hold one side to that standard and let the other side get away with just about anything. That's just partisan hackery, which you seem to indulge in quite a bit.
Click to expand...

:lamo

https://newrepublic.com/article/143...ses-dirty-money-international-crime-syndicate
 
calamity said:
:lamo

https://newrepublic.com/article/143...ses-dirty-money-international-crime-syndicate
Click to expand...

So, if I get the gist of this article, Trump building legitimate buildings legally. OK. Clearly LEO investigated, brought the necessary charges and prosecutions. Any against Trump himself? Nope. So the innuendo doesn't even deliver.

The New Republic is a liberal American magazine of commentary on politics and the arts published since 1914, with influence on American political and cultural thinking. Founded in 1914 by major leaders of the Progressive Movement, it attempted to find a balance between a progressivism focused on humanitarianism and moral passion, and on the other hand sought a basis in scientific analysis of social issues
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Republic
Click to expand...

Yeah, so how much of the article is just made up anyway? Not like this is a legitimate unbiased (if there is such a thing) news source.

Cried 'wolf' far too often. Not taking any of these CTs seriously until there are some actual charges filed.
 
eohrnberger said:
So, if I get the gist of this article, Trump building legitimate buildings legally. OK. Clearly LEO investigated, brought the necessary charges and prosecutions. Any against Trump himself? Nope. So the innuendo doesn't even deliver.



Yeah, so how much of the article is just made up anyway? Not like this is a legitimate unbiased (if there is such a thing) news source.

Cried 'wolf' far too often. Not taking any of these CTs seriously until there are some actual charges filed.
Click to expand...

No. They are still crying about the same wolf. I don't expect the deniers to ever come around. So, no worries.
 
calamity said:
No. They are still crying about the same wolf. I don't expect the deniers to ever come around. So, no worries.
Click to expand...

Not denying anything. If there is real substance to these innuendoes, I'm sure that they'll come to light, and will have to be dealt with.

So far, it's not risen beyond a partisan and biased flogging of a CT.

There's far more and far harder evidence Russian / Democrat and Russian / Hillary + campaign collusion, pay to play. If you are really concerned, I think you should perhaps swing your concerning focus in that direction for a change.
 
JackA said:
He has denigrated the news media since the day he took office. It's one part of a greater denigration, that of denigrating truth, the other part of which is his steady stream of lies. Your conception of the news media is as twisted as his, by the way. Good journalists seek out facts and there are still plenty of good journalists.
Click to expand...

Good journalism is not what I see from the MSM anymore. Events that wouldn't have registered as news are now weeks long media circus. The 'gotcha' journalism is the headline every evening. Your conception of journalism is as frightening as it shows why we have so manysheep. Blindly assuming journalists fact check before publishing is scary. Sean Hannity immediately comes to mind. Journalism has become telling a story that may have started as a shred of truth and spinning it into a ratings boost. The dry boring but informative CNN Igrew up on has turned into a Fox News mirror. I don't enjoy having to have the MSM continuously push 'Such and such' group are the reason for all our countries ills. It's 'gotcha journalism and it is rarely factual. Trump is right that the media has turned in to propaganda nonsense, but wrong in how he goes about his ranting and raving
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom