• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Now we know the reason for the so called fraud Voter Commission set up by Trump!

I'm going to need a better source before this should be given much credibility. Realtime Politics is a website devoted to creating and dispensing a constant stream of fake new about anything Donald Trump.

Just check the headlines on their website:
Realtime Politics
Can't speak for this source, but the story is legit, and was even discussed in its own thread several days ago.

WaPo: White House releases sensitive personal information of voters worried about their sensitive personal information

DP
 
That gave then everything? Five, but forty other States gave him a bunch of information.

Or are you saying five states didn't give info?

Forty five states refused to give the Trumpeteers the info they asked for.
Did they give them other info? I hadn't heard that. Best not to give them anything.
 
JUST IN: Trump’s Voter Fraud Commission Publishes Personal Details of All Trump’s Critics – Realtime Politics
Apparently the Trump voter fraud commission has a reason for being and it has nothing to do with elections. It allows Trump and the GOP to put out personal info on those who appose him. Its not illegal, but it places those in danger who appose him and of course it is used to intimidate all those who are thinking of apposing him in the future. I am sure all of you Trumpers will just say it isn't illegal and everyone else would do the same, but using the power of the president to get such information isn't ethical. I guess it is foolish to use the word ethical and Trump in together is really foolish. I hope all of the states see that the info requested by this commission is going to be used for political purposes and refuse to provide any of it.

Let's just ignore invesitgating known voter fraud and putting a stop to it and do everything possible to make this issue just one mare reason for an "I HATE TRUMP!!!" rant.
 
Either there is widespread voter fraud, or the American voters actually elected a reality TV star to the White House. While there's no evidence for the former, the latter is just too difficult to accept. Let's by all means investigate, but let's not use it as an excuse to punish critics of the Trump Administration, as that would be a clear violation of the 4th. and 1st. amendments, not that the Trumpeteers actually care about the Bill of Rights you understand, but the rest of us do.
 
Let's just ignore invesitgating known voter fraud and putting a stop to it and do everything possible to make this issue just one mare reason for an "I HATE TRUMP!!!" rant.


Pretending there is known voter fraud is still just pretending
 
Can't speak for this source, but the story is legit, and was even discussed in its own thread several days ago.

WaPo: White House releases sensitive personal information of voters worried about their sensitive personal information

DP

Yes, the governess posted the same link.

But the argument can be made that the people willingly exposed their own information when they e-mailed the White House website to comment, applaud, or complain about the commission.

We can legitimately argue the wisdom or propriety of posting that information, but if I write my congressman or senator or the White House, I am fully aware that my name and my correspondence might be used in a campaign ad or read on the floor of the House or Senate. I assume anything I say or expose is fair game to use. For that reason I am extra careful to think about what I am saying and who I might be exposing in those communications.

Of far more concern are those who had no intention of going public with their comments or information who have been compromised by the government either deliberately--think unmasking of people who never gave permission for that--or covertly illegally accumulating personal data on people, or seizing phone records of reporters, or incompetently via hacking of personal information of millions of government workers and private citizens. That went on excessively in the Obama administration with little or no complaints from the MSM or social media.

Edit: It should be noted that it was a sampling of comments that were posted, both positive and negative.
 
Last edited:
Also, I just ran across this from NPR - emphasis mine:

. . .Although a White House blog post on Thursday soliciting written input noted that "the Commission may post such written comments publicly on our website, including names and contact information that are submitted," it is not clear whether the people who submitted comments earlier were aware that their emails in full would be made public, Rotenberg says.​

So it isn't as if the people who wrote the e-mails were not given fair warning. If they didn't read the rules, that isn't the fault of the commission.
Vote Fraud Commission Releases Public Comments, Email Addresses And All : The Two-Way : NPR

But of course the main body of the MSM don't usually post such extenuating information do they.
 
Back
Top Bottom