• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Study Shows That Political Polarization Is Mainly A Right-Wing Phenomenon

Somerville

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
17,868
Reaction score
8,353
Location
On an island. Not that one!
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
The definition and common understanding of "liberal" does include a more open-minded willingness to investigate and listen to those who have differing views. So, for me, this study does little more than affirm my personal experiences dealing with most conservatives.

Study Shows That Political Polarization Is Mainly A Right-Wing Phenomenon

A major new study of social-media sharing patterns shows that political polarization is more common among conservatives than liberals — and that the exaggerations and falsehoods emanating from right-wing media outlets such as Breitbart News have infected mainstream discourse.

Though the report, published by the Columbia Journalism Review, does an excellent job of laying out the challenge posed by Breitbart and its ilk, it is less than clear on how to counter it. Successfully standing up for truthful reporting in this environment “could usher in a new golden age for the Fourth Estate,” the authors write. But members of the public who care about such journalism are already flocking to news organizations like The New York Times, The Washington Post, and, locally, The Boston Globe, all of which have experienced a surge in paid subscriptions since the election of President Trump. That’s heartening, but there are no signs that it’s had any effect on the popularity or influence of the right-wing partisan media.

The CJR study, by scholars at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, at Harvard Law School, and the MIT Center for Civic Media, examined more than 1.25 million articles between April 1, 2015, and Election Day. What they found was that Hillary Clinton supporters shared stories from across a relatively broad political spectrum, including center-right sources such as The Wall Street Journal, mainstream news organizations like the Times and the Post, and partisan liberal sites like The Huffington Post and The Daily Beast.

By contrast, Donald Trump supporters clustered around Breitbart — headed until recently by Stephen Bannon, the hard-right nationalist now ensconced in the White House — and a few like-minded websites such as The Daily Caller, Alex Jones' Infowars, and The Gateway Pundit. Even Fox News was dropped from the favored circle back when it was attacking Trump during the primaries, and only re-entered the fold once it had made its peace with the future president.

Use of disinformation by partisan media sources is neither new nor limited to the right wing, but the insulation of the partisan right-wing media from traditional journalistic media sources, and the vehemence of its attacks on journalism in common cause with a similarly outspoken president, is new and distinctive.
 
The definition and common understanding of "liberal" does include a more open-minded willingness to investigate and listen to those who have differing views. So, for me, this study does little more than affirm my personal experiences dealing with most conservatives.

So the right wing lurched hard to the right while the left-wing and traditional political establishment stayed the same.
 
The definition and common understanding of "liberal" does include a more open-minded willingness to investigate and listen to those who have differing views. So, for me, this study does little more than affirm my personal experiences dealing with most conservatives.

I haven't read the study, but I am curios and will. From what I read in the report it might not answer the sociological question it purports to, but a much narrower one concerning the election related period. It was very probably not that period that was the formative one for the polarization we now see. That was probably a much slower and more cumulative process. That would not mean that the study was uninteresting. It would mean that the interpretation is a little more general that the study allows.
 
So the right wing lurched hard to the right while the left-wing and traditional political establishment stayed the same.

But see we all experience this America they are making statements about, so the first order of business is deciding if this conclusion passes the smell test.

I say no.
 
Back
Top Bottom