- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 52,009
- Reaction score
- 33,944
- Location
- The Golden State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
While we spend a great deal of time shooting holes in each other's interpretation of the Second Amendment (good pun, huh?) and occasionally talking the First to death (Oh, I'm good), we seem to have forgotten several other important amendments, to wit:
[h=3]Patriot Act? Electronic surviellance? Time to take a good look at that one.
[h=3]Asset forfeiture laws have been on the books now for, what, 30 years? How is that not depriving citizens of property without due process?
That one still works if you can afford it. If not, well, you just might be SOL.
.
As the federal government gets more and more power, that one goes unnoticed
Finally:
Article XIV:
There's that pesky word, "property" again, and yet, asset forfeiture laws are still around.
What's your favorite ignored Constitutional amendment? Why?
[h=3]Amendment IV[/h]The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
[h=3]Patriot Act? Electronic surviellance? Time to take a good look at that one.
Amendment V
[/h]No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
[h=3]Asset forfeiture laws have been on the books now for, what, 30 years? How is that not depriving citizens of property without due process?
Amendment VI
[/h]In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
That one still works if you can afford it. If not, well, you just might be SOL.
[h=3]Amendment X[/h]The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
.
As the federal government gets more and more power, that one goes unnoticed
Finally:
Article XIV:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Section 2.
There's that pesky word, "property" again, and yet, asset forfeiture laws are still around.
What's your favorite ignored Constitutional amendment? Why?