1)First, the "appearance of corruption." And Scandal? What sca...
2)Yet. You seriously don't think ...
3)The Clinton Foundation provides AIDS medication for 3/4...
4)But he probably will going forward...
5)Yes he did. President Obama's a millionaire largely because of book sales...
6)How do you know? Just because it wasn't uncovered...
7)Or maybe she just didn't want private conversations about her daughters wedding ...
8)Exactly. You're only argument against Hillary Clinton is that she's been around a long time....
Yeah, I get it. The situations are very different. Republicans attack her unfairly. Obama is/will do some things similar but not quite of the same scale
after his presidency than Clinton did
before hers. Much of what Obama has done/will do is typical of ex presidents from both camps. She was a terrible candidate, the optics on her were bad under any light spectrum, and the right had a ton of material to play with and they didn't have to work very hard at spinning it negatively. She should never have run for a position that put her in the cross hairs in the first place. The DNC should have realized she was bad for their brand and went with someone else. But she pretty much owned the DNC by that point so they were just taking orders. Again, Trump is her fault (and by extension the DNC's), not any particular voting block. My (and many others) failure to equate her with Obama is her fault, not mine (ours).
1)Never said newer was better, I simply said a clean slate is easier to work with than whatever you want to argue her slate is. No one had to convince anyone Obama's slate was clean, that counts for something.
2)Ex-Presidents almost always do,
after the presidency. Usually after they exit politics.
3)Even corrupt charities have to do some good to remain in business. And she never promised to shut down the charity, she promised to sever ties with it, while her daughter ran it, because her daughter would never accept donations made in exchange for her mothers decisions or actions as president.
4)Maybe Bill is the reason she lost then, either way it looked like a crime ring from the outside, and they didn't do anything to dispel the notion. Ignoring accusations at election time is risky business.
5)see #2
6)You could say the same of any candidate. She was exposed, her cronies outed by wikileaks, and she just kept plugging along and barely responded. True or not, she should have passed the torch before it was too late rather than risk the current situation. But she was running for her, what happened to America as a result didn't matter.
7) Maybe she should have conducted all government related communications via the approved and prearranged channels so no one, outside a criminal investigation, would have any grounds to request a batch of information that includes personal emails about weddings and children and such. And a personal email/2nd phone is 1 thing, this is a private server, self contained, that she used for both personal and government business. The government had literally no record of her communications as SOS because she sidestepped their system and used hers instead. She then turns those records over when she feels like it, after her people "prepare" the data package....... Perfect if you're a corrupt, powerful politician, and seemingly unnecessary if you aren't.
8) Obviously experience isn't a bad thing in and of itself. By your logic anyone who's been in politics as long as Hillary should look just as dirty. Can you guess who my counter example would be?
Try not to let them trick you into hating Bernie by 2020.
Good god man, stop blaming voters for not doing what they're told and hold your party accountable for their actions. Bernie will likely be too old by 2020, but he's still done a hell of a lot more for the left than Her Majesty has since the Democratic Convention. But you should probably do whatever you can to make sure Bernie's following remains bitter and angry at the Democratic Party by repeatedly blaming them for 2016 with shaky logic and false equivalencies.
(Quote edited for character limit)
