- Joined
- Jun 3, 2009
- Messages
- 30,870
- Reaction score
- 4,246
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
And where in any of my posts did I use the words "Jewish privilege"?
Why is it okay to point out overrepresentation of whites, but not Jews?
And where in any of my posts did I use the words "Jewish privilege"?
This is a problem somehow?
Why is it okay to point out overrepresentation of whites, but not Jews?
So it's racist to point out when there's disproportionate racial representation in high positions? So then CNN is racist?
Whites being over represented in leadership positions is an effect of white privilege, not the problem of itself.
Is there a problem with the over representation of Jews in the media? Is there a noticeable negative impact on other American's because there are a lot of Jews working at CNN?
Whites being over represented in leadership positions is an effect of white privilege, not the problem of itself.
But is the meme wrong? Is pointing out the reality anti-Semitic?
And if you do think that it's anti-Semitic, why?
Whites are overreperesented: white privilege.
Jews are overrepresented: not an issue.
Funny how that works.
So pointing out facts is racist?
It depends on the intent. This appears to be an attempt to demean CNN for having Jewish people working for them. If they think being Jewish is a negative attribute, it is likely they are anti-Semitic.
Do you have a problem with how white Trump's cabinet is, like CNN does?
We call it idiotic logic created from the mindset that brought us dumb things like protected classes.
The information it self is not anti semitic but you take the entire picture with the statement something is strange about CNN and the probable intent of the picture makes it antisemitic
The obvious intent is to say that CNN is strange because of the number of jewish people working there. It would make those who do not like jew's or CNN start to feel that one or both groups are a problem or "strange"
Also in this picture is not providing the information as a positive aspect but in a negative manner.
I asked you a question about your statement. So what if there are a lot of Jews working for CNN? In what way is this significant?
Ah..that thing no one can prove exists but it exists none the less. Arguing with liberals about white privilege is like getting into a debate with a five year old girl about the existence of unicorns.
Whites are overreperesented: white privilege.
Jews are overrepresented: not an issue.
Funny how that works.
My major problem with it is that CNN is a major contributor to anti-white bias. They constantly point out things like "white privilege" or white overrepresentation, bewailing how awful this is. Yet they themselves are overrepresented with Jews, and we're not allowed to say anything?
I think that it's interesting to say the least. But what's even more interesting is that the people who use overrepresentation of whites as evidence of white privilege have nothing to say about Jewish overrepresentation.
So was CNN anti-white when they pointed out, negatively, the overrepresentation of whites in Trump's cabinet?
I asked you a question about your statement. So what if there are a lot of Jews working for CNN? In what way is this significant?
Because again, whites being over represented in positions of leadership is an effect of white privilege, not the cause in of itself.
And again, what are the negative aspects of Jews being over represented in the media?
There seem to be a lot of Jews in the leadership of CNN.