• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rhode island had 150,000 fake voters – and hillary won the state by 70,000

Slingshot Bob said:
How did that CNN retraction about 17 agencies affect said investigation?
Click to expand...

You guys can't even get your attacks right. That was the NYT not CNN. I'm assuming you mean this story: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/25/...ials-on-russia-frustrate-even-his-allies.html

And then there's this: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ence-agencies-russia-behind-hacking/92514592/

On Oct. 7, the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a joint statement on behalf of the U.S. Intelligence Community. The USIC is made up of 16 agencies, in addition to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
Click to expand...

Statement:
"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations...."
Click to expand...


what does that have to do with an investigation anyway? These are just statements by intelligence agencies measuring the degree in which they agree that Russia hacked the election. Not doubting it!
 
Captain Adverse said:
Where is the evidence of votes that were actually affected by Russian interference? :roll:

I think the point is that if a person is still registered they have the ability to vote.

That if there are 150,000 such people on the Rhode Island voter rolls...then some number of them may well have used that opportunity to vote twice, once in their new State and once in Rhode Island.

That if less than 50% did so, it would still be a larger number than the 70,000 votes Hillary got winning her that State's electors.

Are you offended by tactics used by the Right that are already being used by the Left to spread narratives?
Click to expand...

Presuming they didn't vote for trump, of course.

Maybe fifty percent voted for trump and Hillary won by 150,000 ACTUAL voters.
 
Slingshot Bob said:
Only had what 12+ months at this point? Let us know when the mythical bombshell drops.
Click to expand...

Some investigations take years

The crash of USAir Flight 427 occurred in 1994 and the NTSB released the conclusive report of their investigation in 1998, after 4 years of searching for evidence.
 
eohrnberger said:
A very pertinent question. Illegitimate voters on the voting roles most certainly does not equate to illegal votes, only the potential for illegal votes to be cast.

As posted, it is expensive to remove illegitimate voters from the voting roles, and one has to ask, why is it so expensive? As well as what would yet be fair and just, but be less expensive to implement removing illegitimate voters from voting roles. Surely, there must be an effective, efficient and yet fair and just manner in doing so.
Click to expand...

There is. Way back in the olden days we voted in person rather than by mail. If someone in the precinct didn't vote in a few elections we'd send someone to check if they were still around.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
The investigation is still piecing things together, gathering evidence, interviewing subjects.

They have yet to reach a conclusion.
Click to expand...

Will you and other liberals reimburse the cost to taxpayers when he is exonorated? At what point do you finally admit, nothing = nothing?
 
MrPeanut said:
It's almost like when you say "fake" voters you are trying to imply that they actually voted. Instead the article seems to be about out of date voter rolls.
Click to expand...

I think the point is, this is only in RI. How many fake voters are voting nationwide. Why do libs fight tooth and nail against up to date voter rolls? Why do libs fight tooth and nail against voter ID? Why are libs screaming like banshees because Trump wants to investigate voter fraud? :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
 
PeteEU said:
More snowflake Trump supporters that cant accept he lost the popular vote.
Click to expand...

There's no such thing as "losing the popular vote" in America's presidential election. You worry about your own elections across the swamp there. ;)
 
Slingshot Bob said:
Will you and other liberals reimburse the cost to taxpayers when he is exonorated? At what point do you finally admit, nothing = nothing?
Click to expand...


yes, for the exact same amount you repaid the US for the Benghazi hearings. think this stuff out before you post
 
countryboy said:
There's no such thing as "losing the popular vote" in America's presidential election. You worry about your own elections across the swamp there. ;)
Click to expand...


the problem you have is trump did indeed get his ass whooped in the general election.
 
Slingshot Bob said:
The problem Hillary has, is it was not a popularity contest. Better luck next time...oh, that's right, she is out to pasture:lamo
Click to expand...


the problem trump has is he is less popular then clinton. how embarrassing is that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom