• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donald Trump Reports He’s Getting Rich as President

YorkshirePete said:
So how many are there please tell.
No link? Just your opinion?
My wife is a Medicaid computer person and finds very few not old and not kids
Click to expand...

I know it costs TAXPAYERS 40.2 MILLIOM AN HOUR , yep that right every HOUR !!!!!! :roll:
 
Socrates1 said:
WRONG !!!!! Medicare is costing taxpayers 40.2 MILLIOM AN HOUR , AN HOUR !!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Wow! We were talking about Medicaid and now you interject Medicare. Do you even understand the difference?

Did you bother to read any of the links I posted that thoroughly dispelled the notion that you attempted to peddle here that Medicaid recipriants were "deadbeats".... if you had, you would have addressed the subject in some way rather than trying to change the subject to Medicare (which, by the way is a subsidized health insurance program)

If you are really that clueless about the subject matter discussed here, you bring no intelligence to this debate. No one is interested in an engaging in debate someone that is ignorant and chooses to remain that way. Either step up your game or find a forum that specializes in ignorant shouting.

BTW... the fact that Medicare expenditures equate to $40M an hour (I will accept this for the sake of argument, though my guess is its another wrong impression in your head), is, in and of itself, a meaningless statement.

Your arguments remain weak because that lack the foundation of understanding the issues.
 
Last edited:
upsideguy said:
Wow! We were talking about Medicaid and now you interject Medicare. Do you even understand the difference?

Did you bother to read any of the links I posted that thoroughly dispelled the notion that you attempted to peddle here that Medicaid recipriants were "deadbeats".... if you had, you would have addressed the subject in some way rather than trying to change the subject to Medicare (which, by the way is a subsidized health insurance program)

If you are really that clueless about the subject matter discussed here, you bring no intelligence to this debate. No one is interested in an engaging in debate someone that is ignorant and chooses to remain that way. Either step up your game or find a forum that specializes in ignorant shouting.

BTW... the fact that Medicare expenditures equate to $40M an hour (I will accept this for the sake of argument, though my guess is its another wrong impression in your head), is, in and of itself, a meaningless statement.

Your arguments remain weak because that lack the foundation of understanding the issues.
Click to expand...

It was Medicaid costing 40.2 million per hour , just far too many programs funded by TAXPAYERS to keep track of . Way too much weed in that area these days . :roll:
 
JasperL said:
Okee dokee. I can restate it :shrug: Your comment was nonsense because what person A did or didn't do has no effect at all on determining whether what B did was improper.

Similar logic:

Sue injured someone in a drunk driving accident.

You: So what - Bob once drove 80mph in a 50mph zone!
Click to expand...

Just because YOU don't understand how it's logically connected, doesn't mean it's not. ;)


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom