• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gunman: 'kill as many republicans as possible'

Status
Not open for further replies.
SenorXm/Sirius said:
Does seem a little strange though that he knew members of Congress were practicing, and where they were practicing, but he didn't know if they were Repubs or Dems. And he didn't recognize who was there? Seems like he did some research, but not enough? IDK.
Click to expand...

That is probably the case. Not every terrorist is a master planner, or is even fully versed about his / her targets. Jihadi terrorists can range from expert to incompetent in their abilities. Politically motivated terrorists, either leftist or right wing have the same range of abilities.
 
Editor's correction in red:

OlNate said:
Can't take you seriously until you learn how to spell as that is my way out of any serious reply to your post...and after that, try "history before 2016 election". You know, when conservatives were burning fake Obamas? Both sides have engaged in this rhetoric, both sides are to blame, if indeed the blame lies with recent violent political rhetoric....which is questionable as well, since you guys have been killing politicians since David Ramsay (1815).
Click to expand...

Oh yes, Republicans were fueled with hate for 8-years, and we had all the major networks propagandizing that hate. It culminated in the series of episodes we've experience in the past 6-months.

Demokrats are the ones with a long history of violence.

It's the Leftists long history worldwide... violence and death.
 
zimmer said:
Editor's correction in red:



Oh yes, Republicans were fueled with hate for 8-years, and we had all the major networks propagandizing that hate. It culminated in the series of episodes we've experience in the past 6-months.

Demokrats are the ones with a long history of violence.

It's the Leftists long history worldwide... violence and death.
Click to expand...

Does the lefts long history of violence include or exclude the KKK?
 
zimmer said:
Pointing out the partial history of Demokrat behavior is not "irony". Comparing their behavior accurately to history is not "irony".

Perhaps you need a dictionary.

Obviously you have no rebuttal, and were left with that straw.

As noted yesterday... I encourage you to post often.
Click to expand...

Not-of-this-earth, full-tile lunacy like you posted doesn't need rebuttal; it rebuts itself.

Have someone explain 'irony' to you.
 
Winston said:
How do GOPs reconcile their 2nd Am. stance?
Click to expand...

Criminals will have guns.

Only people with guns will stop idiots with guns.

Waiting for the cops in this instance would have resulted in many, if not all dead.

The best friend of a woman in a bad spot with a murderer or rapist is a gun.

In Venezuela, had they not disarmed the citizens, their sick regime might be out of business.

When guns are denied the citizenry, millions can die, and have died. How do you reconcile that?
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Not-of-this-earth, full-tile lunacy like you posted doesn't need rebuttal; it rebuts itself.

Have someone explain 'irony' to you.
Click to expand...

I see you didn't like what you found in the dictionary.

Keep posting, you're the best advertising for not being a Leftist there is.

PS. I see you are incapable of rebutting what I posted, hence your shadow boxing. Don't knock yourself out! The Right needs you to keep posting.
 
zimmer said:
Criminals will have guns.

Only people with guns will stop idiots with guns.

Waiting for the cops in this instance would have resulted in many, if not all dead.

The best friend of a woman in a bad spot with a murderer or rapist is a gun.

In Venezuela, had they not disarmed the citizens, their sick regime might be out of business.

When guns are denied the citizenry, millions can die, and have died. How do you reconcile that?
Click to expand...

Really? And a good guy with a van could stop a bad guy with a van in London, too, to be sure.
 
zimmer said:
I see you didn't like what you found in the dictionary.

Keep posting, you're the best advertising for not being a Leftist there is.

PS. I see you are incapable of rebutting what I posted, hence your shadow boxing. Don't knock yourself out! The Right needs you to keep posting.
Click to expand...

LOL! Marxists like you are so desperate in your need for validation.
 
Slingshot Bob said:
So banning guns does not work? Who would of thought that?
Click to expand...

Could a good guy with a van ram a bad guy with a van to neutralize the threat, lol?
 
Ironic the guy bitching about "fake news" starts a thread with a made up quote as the title. Can't make this **** up anymore.
 
americanwoman said:
Ironic the guy bitching about "fake news" starts a thread with a made up quote as the title. Can't make this **** up anymore.
Click to expand...

Right, that is truly the broader issue here.
 
X Factor said:
You're enjoying this, aren't ya? Typical really.
Click to expand...

I take no pleasure in the events of this morning. But, I don't mind arguing with people equipped with feeble talking points.
 
X Factor said:
Right, that is truly the broader issue here.
Click to expand...

Well spreading fake quotes that the gunman said "kill as many republicans as possible" while constantly going on about "fake news" does seem a little contradicting and I had to point it out.

Here's your first post in the thread:

X Factor said:
You're enjoying this, aren't ya? Typical really.
Click to expand...

Is that really the broader issue here, pointing out someone is typically enjoying this? Kind of how I pointed out the OP is enjoying it by spreading fake quotes to incite more hate. Because things like that will cause more anger and hate, which is the broader issue.
 
TheGoverness said:
Might actually not be too bad of an idea, in that kind of situation.
Click to expand...

they would have to anticipate the threat and be 100% certain that weaponizing a van would be justified vigilante justice, it could easily go awry.
 
Winston said:
Really? And a good guy with a van could stop a bad guy with a van in London, too, to be sure.
Click to expand...

You asked about the 2nd Amendment.

Try sticking to your question. I answered it, and seems I did so in a manner where you see the validity, but are so welded to your POV that nothing will penetrate deep enough to have you contemplate you changing your opinion.

So much for being open-minded, and correcting bad logic with better logic.

That's why I am a former Leftist. I once believed virtually the entire palette of fare sold by the Demokrats. As I grew, asked and analyzed, I could see the massive holes in their logic.

I changed... because I was open-minded. I still am, but there hasn't been anything logical that would have me change back. Fact is, the Left has become crazy and dangerous in the pursuit of their goals. A shame for the country, and those sucked into the poisonous vortex.

So what was it you wanted to correct about my defense of the 2nd Amendment?
 
americanwoman said:
Well spreading fake quotes that the gunman said "kill as many republicans as possible" while constantly going on about "fake news" does seem a little contradicting and I had to point it out.

Here's your first post in the thread:



Is that really the broader issue here, pointing out someone is typically enjoying this? Kind of how I pointed out the OP is enjoying it by spreading fake quotes to incite more hate. Because things like that will cause more anger and hate, which is the broader issue.
Click to expand...

I have a problem with people who have a problem with the Obama quote. They are hypocrites. GOP congressmen campaign with videos of them shooting rifles, not a peep. But a black guy figuratively and colloquially says 'gun' and GOPs lose their head.
 
americanwoman said:
Well spreading fake quotes that the gunman said "kill as many republicans as possible" while constantly going on about "fake news" does seem a little contradicting and I had to point it out.

Here's your first post in the thread:



Is that really the broader issue here, pointing out someone is typically enjoying this? Kind of how I pointed out the OP is enjoying it by spreading fake quotes to incite more hate. Because things like that will cause more anger and hate, which is the broader issue.
Click to expand...

Yup. OP seems to get a kick out of using these kinds of tragic events to make jabs at his political adversaries.
 
TheGoverness said:
Yup. OP seems to get a kick out of using these kinds of tragic events to make jabs at his political adversaries.
Click to expand...

Here is the OP:
Rep. Mark Walker says gunman targeted congressional baseball practice 'to kill as many Republican members as possible'

He was correct. He quoted the article and Representative accurately.

Also, did the gunman not want to kill as many Republicans as possible?

If only the Left was so aggressive with their Goebbels Media and their dishonest reporting/Fake News.
 
zimmer said:
Rep. Mark Walker says gunman targeted congressional baseball practice 'to kill as many Republican members as possible'

Not Fake News.
And the OP rightly references the quote.
Click to expand...

The title clearly states: Gunman: 'kill as many republicans as possible' to make it seem like the gunman said it when in fact it was an opinion by someone. To be more accurate, in accordance with the link itself, a better more honest title would have been something more clearer: Rep. Mark Walker says gunman targeted congressional baseball practice 'to kill as many Republican members as possible'.

You can disagree and think the title is rightly referenced but I disagree.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom