• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's latest tweet storm

Vetplus40 said:
Please post the forum rules where it says that I HAVE to post a link regarding my posts. That said, every time that you "whine" about not having a link, and somebody subsequently posts a link, you "whine" about the link. Stop "whining" so much and do some reading.
Click to expand...

It is a standard practice...a convention...it is expected. Those who don't provide sources to whatever they are talking about are considered one step above a troll and not to be taken seriously. That's why I consider this a failed thread from the very first post...yours.
 
Vetplus40 said:
A "useful idiot" is analogous to a "sanitary landfill". Then again, you subscribe to Conway's "Alternative Facts" mentality.

A Trumpbot referencing anybody being a "parrot" is simply hilarious. You folks are the biggest collection of mindless talking parrots that I have ever encountered. And that says a lot.
Click to expand...

Oh...now you are stereotyping me.

(you aren't helping your case any)
 
Vetplus40 said:
It was, is and will always be a Muslim ban!
Click to expand...

NO. :no:

Had it been simply a "Muslim" ban, then it would have been a blanket ban on ALL Muslims from any nation a Muslim may reside in external to the U.S.A.

This was a ban on seven nations identified as posing threats via "Muslim" terrorists or other anti-American activities.

You know, those "Radical Islamist Terrorists" we see acting out?

If I had been party, I would have suggested a couple of more, including Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. :shrug:
 
Last edited:
Captain Adverse said:
NO. :no:

Had it been simply a "Muslim" ban, then it would have been a blanket ban on ALL Muslims from any nation a Muslim may reside in external to the U.S.A.

This was a ban on seven nations identified as posing threats via "Muslim" terrorists or other anti-American activities.

You know, those "Radical Islamist Terrorists" we see acting out?

If I had been party, I would have suggested a couple of more, including Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. :shrug:
Click to expand...


You are incorrect Trump calls it a ban so it's a ban it's his ban so he can call it a ban
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom