• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

8 Minutes

8 minutes isn't bad at all considering London's traffic, and the amount of people on the streets at the time for the foot cops to sort through. Haven't been there in 22 years so I imagine it's quite a lot more these days.

The OP, although snarky, was using a pro-gun analogy in a round about way. The cops can be there in minutes.....when seconds count.

Kudo's to the brave people who fended the bad guys off, I'm sure they saved at least a few lives.

They just had the concert bombing and were on the highest highest alert....the Terrorist know they have 8 mins or more before anyone will show up with a gun, So yes 8 mins is a very very long time for a free reign killing spree
 
They just had the concert bombing and were on the highest highest alert....the Terrorist know they have 8 mins or more before anyone will show up with a gun, So yes 8 mins is a very very long time for a free reign killing spree

Terror is not about victim body counts - it is about making, otherwise apathetic, folks feel that they are unsafe due to your "cause". A suicidal Jihadi moron has already decided that they will not survive their attack - to them losing their life (on Earth) is part of winning the battle (for eternal bliss).
 
They just had the concert bombing and were on the highest highest alert....the Terrorist know they have 8 mins or more before anyone will show up with a gun, So yes 8 mins is a very very long time for a free reign killing spree

The concert bombing was in Manchester, 150 miles away, days before. The alert level had been reduced back to severe again, where it's been for months.
Terrorists never know if there's an armed response vehicle around the corner, especially in London. Thank you for your concern, but it's not needed.
 
Terror is not about victim body counts - it is about making, otherwise apathetic, folks feel that they are unsafe due to your "cause". A suicidal Jihadi moron has already decided that they will not survive their attack - to them losing their life (on Earth) is part of winning the battle (for eternal bliss).

They wore fake bomb vests to ensure that they were taken out. More arrests today, as the police work through their family and social networks.
 
They just had the concert bombing and were on the highest highest alert....the Terrorist know they have 8 mins or more before anyone will show up with a gun, So yes 8 mins is a very very long time for a free reign killing spree
It wasn’t 8 minutes to show up, it was 8 minutes from the moment they were called to the moment the last active terrorist was stopped. Regardless of anything else, that was an quick and effective operation for which the officers involved should be congratulated. I think that can and should be recognised as a stand-alone point.

The wider spin you seem to be putting on this, that the general lack of gun ownership in the UK puts us at greater risk, it flawed on a number of counts. Since we simply don’t have the same kind of legitimate gun culture as the US, even in guns were legally available, most British people wouldn’t own them and certainly not be carrying them on a night out (if they did, we’d see many more drunken shootings that terrorist attacks). There is also no guarantee that had random civilians in the area had been armed, they would have stopped the attack any quicker that the police and that they couldn’t have caused additional harm and confusion. Finally, if guns were freely available in the UK, the chances are the terrorists would have had them, massively changing the nature of their attacks and almost certainly increasing the deaths and injuries they could cause, as has been seen from attacks elsewhere involving individuals with access to firearms (not least, of course, in the US).
 
They wore fake bomb vests to ensure that they were taken out. More arrests today, as the police work through their family and social networks.

This is an interesting thing to watch - if it is OK to arrest (detain based on past association with?) "sympathizers" and "supporters" then maybe this can be used to go after other "terror" groups like street gangs.
 
This is an interesting thing to watch - if it is OK to arrest (detain based on past association with?) "sympathizers" and "supporters" then maybe this can be used to go after other "terror" groups like street gangs.

They are formally arrested to be questioned under caution. Everything is recorded, with lawyers and all. Eight of those arrested in Manchester have already been released without charge.

To return to the eight minute obsession by others, the eight minutes refers to the armed police. Four "ordinary" police heroes had already encountered them, and been wounded, while protecting the public.
 
They are formally arrested to be questioned under caution. Everything is recorded, with lawyers and all. Eight of those arrested in Manchester have already been released without charge.

To return to the eight minute obsession by others, the eight minutes refers to the armed police. Four "ordinary" police heroes had already encountered them, and been wounded, while protecting the public.

That (bolded above) sounds like a busywork display being put on by the government to assure the folks that they are "taking action". How, exactly, do you arrest someone without charge?
 
That (bolded above) sounds like a busywork display being put on by the government to assure the folks that they are "taking action". How, exactly, do you arrest someone without charge?
It’s not unusual here. Arrest is used somewhat differently in the UK compared to places like the US, just as part of the formal process of investigation, so it’s not at all uncommon for people who are arrested to be released shortly afterwards without charge.

I can understand the police being quite liberal with their use of arrest in cases like this (maybe a little too much, though it’s a difficult balance) given the risk of missing someone who is actually guilty and them getting away. I very much doubt there was any direct government intervention in this, especially since the same kind of thing has happened following similar incidents in the past and the fact we have something of a “skeleton government” at the moment due to the pending election.
 
Back
Top Bottom