- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 49,644
- Reaction score
- 55,258
- Location
- Tucson, AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
That photo expresses a wish to see President Trump killed violently. But it was symbolic speech only, and did nothing to further the end it portrayed. Anyone is free to hate or disrespect any President, or to desecrate his image. We don't have kings in America, nor has the idea of lese majeste ever lived here. The photo does not shock me any more than it would shock me to see an effigy of a President or other public figure being hanged or burned. That has happened many thousands of times in many thousands of places around this country during its history, and most people have seen it as a testimonial to American freedom of speech. I see this photo in the same light.
You're right in that there is nothing criminal about what she did. It was merely tasteless and she reaped a good bit of what she sowed. Here "Victimhood" deal, however, is likely to cost her more than the stunt ever did.
The left was pissed at her because she went overboard and afforded Trump a bit of sympathy when they had him against the wall for his European trip. By playing the victim card today she doubled down on that and then some. She accused Trump of trying to hurt her because his 11 year old son was shocked by the image. There is no scenario where that plays well and she's pretty much saying "We can say whatever we want about Trump but he can't say anything back."