• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Complete (And Ever Expanding) List Of Hillary's Excuses For Election Loss

Fishking said:
Dishonest? I clearly stated no one has been charged and there has not been anything found to do so. You agreed with that statement. Now you want to back out of it? Lol, OK, fine.
Click to expand...

Yes, laughably dishonest. You stated, "You finally agree that there is nothing there. Good." when I said no such thing. Your penchant for playing cutsie-poo words games prevents you from making any sort of cogent or honest argument, as always.
Yes, there are investigations going on but as of yet there isn't evidence of a crime or a person would be charged.
Click to expand...

Yet again you demonstrate that you have no idea what you're babbling about. There could be enough evidence to charge someone but they're holding off to move further up the food chain and ensnare other players as the investigations continue.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Yes, laughably dishonest. You stated, "You finally agree that there is nothing there. Good." when I said no such thing. Your penchant for playing cutsie-poo words games prevents you from making any sort of cogent or honest argument, as always.
Click to expand...

Errr...back it up another step, tiger.

Fishking said:
There is only one reality and that reality is that no one has been charged with anything and they so far don't have anything to do so.
Click to expand...

Tanngrisnir said:
Oh, did someone make a claim otherwise?
Click to expand...

Yet again you demonstrate that you have no idea what you're babbling about. There could be enough evidence to charge someone but they're holding off to move further up the food chain and ensnare other players as the investigations continue.
Click to expand...

Yes, I'm sure they have some solid evidence but somehow the leakiest environment to have ever existed, set up by Obama, is keeping that one under wraps. Gotcha. They also aren't making sure that the people that they actually do have evidence on aren't leaving the country for some reasons. Hmmm....

Hillary recently used the word "nothingburger" and that is appropriate here. We have a giant nothingburger so far, no matter how desperately you would want it not to be true.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Plenty of names, as you already would know if you could be bothered to inform yourself of the investigations and their developments.
Click to expand...

That is no answer, but what I expected.
 
Fishking said:
Errr...back it up another step, tiger.
Click to expand...

Don't need to. Your dishonesty is already on full display.
Yes, I'm sure they have some solid evidence but somehow the leakiest environment to have ever existed, set up by Obama, is keeping that one under wraps. Gotcha. They also aren't making sure that the people that they actually do have evidence on aren't leaving the country for some reasons. Hmmm....

Hillary recently used the word "nothingburger" and that is appropriate here. We have a giant nothingburger so far, no matter how desperately you would want it not to be true.
Click to expand...

LOL! Again, I'm simply not interested in the delusions that populate your imagination and flights of fancy about Obama.

You have no idea what they're doing, nor how investigations operate nor about the specifics of any of the current ones, so why bother trying to comment?
 
Tanngrisnir said:
DLOL! Again, I'm simply not interested in the delusions that populate your imagination and flights of fancy about Obama.
Click to expand...

Delusions? Lol...no. This is verifiable reality. What do you think the EO he signed, just days before Trump's swearing in to spread intel all over the place was all about? Then you had the deputy secretary of defense admit it on TV.
 
Fishking said:
Delusions? Lol...no. This is verifiable reality. What do you think the EO he signed, just days before Trump's swearing in to spread intel all over the place was all about? Then you had the deputy secretary of defense admit it on TV.
Click to expand...

No, it's not. I know you desperately, pathologically need it to be, but that won't change the reality of it.

Saying it's so won't magically make it so.
 
Moot said:
Comey is going to testify to the Senate Intelligence Committee next week about Trump's interference in the investigation. It should be fun.

Oh...and his son in law, Jarod Kuchner lied on his security clearance application...which is a felony. So he might be going to prison sooner rather than later.

Also...it was just discovered that Jeff Sessions lied more than previously thought about his contact with the Russians....so he's one foot out the door, too.


Poor Trump... his little circle is getting smaller and smaller...and fewer and fewer people are willing to work for him because "they don't want their reputations ruined."
Click to expand...

Comey already testified under Oath that no one tried to obstruct the investigations.
So your telling me hes going to perjer himself ?
Lol....that will make him a credible witness in a criminal probe.....not really
 
Tanngrisnir said:
No, it's not. I know you desperately, pathologically need it to be, but that won't change the reality of it.

Saying it's so won't magically make it so.
Click to expand...

Sorry, it's not magic, it's documented reality.
 
Fishking said:
I'm sorry that you confuse reality with fantasy. Here in the real world we already know these things you're ignorant of.

https://www.wired.com/2017/01/just-time-trump-nsa-loosens-privacy-rules/
Click to expand...

Oh, dear. You've fallen into the old 'correlation doesn't not imply causation' trap again. Not surprising really.

Your claim was "the leakiest environment to have ever existed, set up by Obama," and your link doesn't back that up.

"Obama’s Justice Department has signed off on new rules to let the NSA share more of its unfiltered intelligence with its fellow agencies—including those with a domestic law enforcement agenda."

You might try reading your own links. Nothing about it adding to more leaks whatsoever.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Oh, dear. You've fallen into the old 'correlation doesn't not imply causation' trap again. Not surprising really.

Your claim was "the leakiest environment to have ever existed, set up by Obama," and your link doesn't back that up.

"Obama’s Justice Department has signed off on new rules to let the NSA share more of its unfiltered intelligence with its fellow agencies—including those with a domestic law enforcement agenda."

You might try reading your own links. Nothing about it adding to more leaks whatsoever.
Click to expand...

Uhh...I'm guessing your'e struggling because you don't have any experience in these types of things so you don't know why we previously kept intel compartmentalized. It's OK. Just say you're ignorant and move on.
 
Fishking said:
Uhh...I'm guessing your'e struggling because you don't have any experience in these types of things so you don't know why we previously kept intel compartmentalized. It's OK. Just say you're ignorant and move on.
Click to expand...

It's OK that you can't back up your claim and had to back down when challenged on it.

I'm sure you're used to that by now.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
It's OK that you can't back up your claim and had to back down when challenged on it.

I'm sure you're used to that by now.
Click to expand...

Lol...and now you can't even read words. I haven't backed down at all. I've shown facts to back up my point and continued to maintain it. You, however, continue to flail about in your normal uncontrolled and overly emotional tirades. Zero substance, 100% bluster. I've called you out, rubbed your nose in it, and now you're stinging from the treatment. It's OK...you'll be on to your next tantrum soon enough.
 
Fishking said:
Lol...and now you can't even read words. I haven't backed down at all. I've shown facts to back up my point and continued to maintain it. You, however, continue to flail about in your normal uncontrolled and overly emotional tirades. Zero substance, 100% bluster. I've called you out, rubbed your nose in it, and now you're stinging from the treatment. It's OK...you'll be on to your next tantrum soon enough.
Click to expand...

No, you made a claim and then, when challenged on it, linked to irrelevant information that didn't substantiate your claim. Now you're clearly upset.

Again, sorry that you continually have to run away from your own posts, but your pathological dishonesty simply isn't my problem.

That white flag of surrender is a good look for you.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
No, you made a claim and then, when challenged on it, linked to irrelevant information that didn't substantiate your claim. Now you're clearly upset.

Again, sorry that you continually have to run away from your own posts, but your pathological dishonesty simply isn't my problem.

That white flag of surrender is a good look for you.
Click to expand...

Lol...you don't even know enough to realize what the link I provided means. It's OK, again, just say you're ignorant of the subject and move on.
 
Fishking said:
Lol...you don't even know enough to realize what the link I provided means. It's OK, again, just say you're ignorant of the subject and move on.
Click to expand...

But, of course, I actually do. It's irrelevant to the claim you made, and you're desperately trying to distract from that fact.

Sorry you couldn't back up your claim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom