• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Paris Accord: Let's see if the press has learned anything.

Vetplus40

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 15, 2017
Messages
4,592
Reaction score
2,283
Location
South Western Mississippi
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Each and every time that Trump finds himself on the "hotseat", he manages to change the narrative and the press goes chasing after it like the dog who takes off running even when it's owner only pretends to throw the stick. It will be interesting to see how much time the press spends following this rabbit down the "rabbit hole".

One thing is for sure, Mueller has just one area of focus, and it sure as hell isn't climate change. As such, he is only going to be chasing one кролик to see where it leads to.
 
Looks like the Paris accord will be a "one news cycle" story. We are already back to focusing (as we should be) on the Russian influence in our elections and possibly Russian ties to the Trump Administration as well.
 
Zzzzzzzzzz
 
The story that got knocked off the top of the fold was the Michael Isakoff story about Trump trying to kiss the ass of Russia almost from day one when his band of goons assumed office.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-ad...se-russia-sanctions-fell-short-231301145.html


In the early weeks of the Trump administration, former Obama administration officials and State Department staffers fought an intense, behind-the-scenes battle to head off efforts by incoming officials to normalize relations with Russia, according to multiple sources familiar with the events. Unknown to the public at the time, top Trump administration officials, almost as soon as they took office, tasked State Department staffers with developing proposals for the lifting of economic sanctions, the return of diplomatic compounds and other steps to relieve tensions with Moscow. These efforts to relax or remove punitive measures imposed by President Obama in retaliation for Russia’s intervention in Ukraine and meddling in the 2016 election alarmed some State Department officials, who immediately began lobbying congressional leaders to quickly pass legislation to block the move, the sources said.

“There was serious consideration by the White House to unilaterally rescind the sanctions,” said Dan Fried, a veteran State Department official who served as chief U.S. coordinator for sanctions policy until he retired in late February. He said in the first few weeks of the administration, he received several “panicky” calls from U.S. government officials who told him they had been directed to develop a sanctions-lifting package and imploring him, “Please, my God, can’t you stop this?”

Fried said he grew so concerned that he contacted Capitol Hill allies — including Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., the ranking minority member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee — to urge them to move quickly to pass legislation that would “codify” the sanctions in place, making it difficult for President Trump to remove them.
Tom Malinowski, who had just stepped down as President Obama’s assistant secretary of state for human rights, told Yahoo News he too joined the effort to lobby Congress after learning from former colleagues that the administration was developing a plan to lift sanctions — and possibly arrange a summit between Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin — as part of an effort to achieve a “grand bargain” with Moscow. “It would have been a win-win for Moscow,” said Malinowski, who only days before he left office announced his own round of sanctions against senior Russian officials for human rights abuses under a law known as the Magnitsky Act.

People need to read this as it lays out how Trump tried to pay Russia back for help in getting him elected.

Why is Trump so set on helping Russia after they attempted to attack our very democratic institutions interfering in our election?

Either they have something on him and he is now their puppet.... or Trump has deep financial arrangements with Russia and cares more about them than he does his own nation and our people.

Either way - he needs to go ASAP.
 
The story that got knocked off the top of the fold was the Michael Isakoff story about Trump trying to kiss the ass of Russia almost from day one when his band of goons assumed office.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-ad...se-russia-sanctions-fell-short-231301145.html

People need to read this as it lays out how Trump tried to pay Russia back for help in getting him elected.

Why is Trump so set on helping Russia after they attempted to attack our very democratic institutions interfering in our election?

Either they have something on him and he is now their puppet.... or Trump has deep financial arrangements with Russia and cares more about them than he does his own nation and our people.

Either way - he needs to go ASAP.[/QUOTE

]I can hear the "fake news" rants already.
 
The story that got knocked off the top of the fold was the Michael Isakoff story about Trump trying to kiss the ass of Russia almost from day one when his band of goons assumed office.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-ad...se-russia-sanctions-fell-short-231301145.html

People need to read this as it lays out how Trump tried to pay Russia back for help in getting him elected.

Why is Trump so set on helping Russia after they attempted to attack our very democratic institutions interfering in our election?

Either they have something on him and he is now their puppet.... or Trump has deep financial arrangements with Russia and cares more about them than he does his own nation and our people.

Either way - he needs to go ASAP.[/QUOTE

]I can hear the "fake news" rants already.

Notice that this story was NOT anonymous sources or nameless people leaking. It had named people with knowledge of what they were talking about. And much of it was confirmed by administration comments in the same story. It would be very very difficult - insane really - to pretend that this was fake news.

Of course, the delusional right wing being what it is - they just may do as you suggest.
 
Back
Top Bottom