• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox: WH Official says Kushner did not Suggest Secret Channel with Russia

calamity said:
Yesterday:
Jared Kushner didn't suggest Russian communications channel in meeting, source says



Today:
Kellyanne Conway dismisses Jared Kushner's back channel to Russia as the 'regular course of business'


Do the people in the White House not talk to each other?
Click to expand...

nope1.gif
 
"Back channels like this are the regular course of business, and that's really all that we know,"
Click to expand...

She never defined "this", so I am going to assume she meant "like the one you all are theorizing Kushner wanted".
 
Hawkeye10 said:
She never defined "this", so I am going to assume she meant "like the one you all are theorizing Kushner wanted".
Click to expand...
Oh, quit making excuses for him.

You sound like Bubba' debating the meaning of *is*.
 
Chomsky said:
Oh, quit making excuses for him.

You sound like Bubba' debating the meaning of *is*.
Click to expand...

according to the source.
Click to expand...
"The Source" is lying as all anonymous sources typically are. Kellyanne Conway is telling the truth because she's putting her name out there. It's very easy to figure out the lies coming from the media these days. And while Fox News has a much better record than the MSM, they aren't above making **** up either.
 
Chomsky said:
Oh, quit making excuses for him.

You sound like Bubba' debating the meaning of *is*.
Click to expand...

I am doing no such thing, its her job to spin, it is the journalists job to ask the next question and nail down what "this" means here. This is really basic stuff Chomsky but they cant be bothered, and then they assume what they want to assume, what ever paints Trump and his people and people who like him as negatively as possible....because there is an impeachment to get done, because We the People are not going to be allowed to send a Trump to town.

This we cant be allowed to get away with.
 
Last edited:
Hawkeye10 said:
I am doing no such thing, its her job to spin, it is the journalists job to ask the next question and nail down what "this" means here. This is really basic stuff Chomsky but they cant be bothered, and then they assume what they want to assume, what ever paints Trump and his people and people who like him as negatively as possible....because there is an impeachment to get done, because We the People are not going to be allowed to send a Trump to town.

This we cant be allowed to get away with.
Click to expand...
Her words stand as a matter of record.

If you'd like to add or subtract to or from them, to force a meaning that suits another narrative more suitable to your desired portrayal of the events, don't expect other's to necessarily go along for the ride.
 
Chomsky said:
Her words stand as a matter of record.

If you'd like to add or subtract to or from them, to force a meaning that suits another narrative more suitable to your desired portrayal of the events, don't expect other's to necessarily go along for the ride.
Click to expand...

The meaning of those words however was never determined, because the so-called journalist did not do their job properly, a very common problem now that the entire elite class sucks so bad.
 
Grand Mal said:
This guy going behind the back of his government to establish secret lines of communication is a regular course of business? I wonder if anyones doing that now. What a strange way to run a country.
Click to expand...
And what she doesn't say, is they not only did a run behind the backs of the State Dept, Intelligence Agencies, National Security, and Homeland Security, but they tried to use a Russian Telcom to do it!

The most obvious question is: "Who the hell's side are they on"?

'Cuz' it ain't ours!
 
Hawkeye10 said:
The meaning of those words however was never determined, because the so-called journalist did not do their job properly, a very common problem now that the entire elite class sucks so bad.
Click to expand...
Hawkeye, these last coupla' posts are sounding very KellyAnne like.

You're trying to push your stuff on the wrong guy. I didn't buy from her, and I ain't buying it now.
 
Chomsky said:
Hawkeye, these last coupla' posts are sounding very KellyAnne like.

You're trying to push your stuff on the wrong guy. I didn't buy from her, and I ain't buying it now.
Click to expand...

Does not matter, the guy who has "THINK" plastered on his head must follow the rules of logic and as well the rules of the English language.

You are a disappointment tonight.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Does not matter, the guy who has "THINK" plastered on his head must follow the rules of logic and as well the rules of the English language.

You are a disappointment tonight.
Click to expand...
Better luck, tomorrow. ;)
 
Chomsky said:
And what she doesn't say, is they not only did a run behind the backs of the State Dept, Intelligence Agencies, National Security, and Homeland Security, but they tried to use a Russian Telcom to do it!

The most obvious question is: "Who the hell's side are they on"?

'Cuz' it ain't ours!
Click to expand...
Right. Trump's team trusts the Russians more than our own intelligence agencies. And that is bad. Very bad.
 
calamity said:
Right. Trump's team trusts the Russians more than our own intelligence agencies. And that is bad. Very bad.
Click to expand...
It's worse than lacking trust in our intel agencies.

He sees *them* as the enemy! :doh

So who is the real enemy, then? Yep! We've got an interloper in the People's House.
 
reinoe said:
"The Source" is lying as all anonymous sources typically are. Kellyanne Conway is telling the truth because she's putting her name out there. It's very easy to figure out the lies coming from the media these days. And while Fox News has a much better record than the MSM, they aren't above making **** up either.
Click to expand...

Alternative facts comedy gold!
 
Chomsky said:
It's worse than lacking trust in our intel agencies.

He sees *them* as the enemy! :doh

So who is the real enemy, then? Yep! We've got an interloper in the People's House.
Click to expand...

The Brits also see our federal intelligence/law enforcement agencies as their enemy which is why they refuse to share information with them. Since they're spying on the American people they're the enemies of America.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
I am doing no such thing, its her job to spin, it is the journalists job to ask the next question and nail down what "this" means here. This is really basic stuff Chomsky but they cant be bothered, and then they assume what they want to assume, what ever paints Trump and his people and people who like him as negatively as possible....because there is an impeachment to get done, because We the People are not going to be allowed to send a Trump to town.

This we cant be allowed to get away with.
Click to expand...

Total horse****. Everyone knows what she was talking about, stop making excuses for her with your spin about "spin".
 
Chomsky said:
It's worse than lacking trust in our intel agencies.

He sees *them* as the enemy! :doh

So who is the real enemy, then? Yep! We've got an interloper in the People's House.
Click to expand...

Sure. In essence, he sees our rule of law, as it would apply to him and his nutty agenda, as the enemy. That is, without a doubt, tyrannical thinking.
 
calamity said:
Sure. In essence, he sees our rule of law, as it would apply to him and his nutty agenda, as the enemy. That is, without a doubt, tyrannical thinking.
Click to expand...
Not just are our laws the enemy, but also our democratic institutions like the judiciary, and even the Constitution itself! He falls aside of the 1stA (where everything starts). I've concluded the guy's un-Amereican. He holds citizenship. He holds the Presidency. But he's un-American. A total disgust.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom