• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Anti-Trump CNN propaganda has become nauseating

Unitedwestand13 said:
The Russian investigation is based on facts.

The facts are that the DNC was hacked in 2016, by Russian hackers, in a attempt to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. There are also multiple people within Trumps inner circle, who have been in contact with the Russians: general Michael Flynn was one of these people.


Why is investigating this such a sore issue ?
Click to expand...

The report on which the Russian hacking of the DNC is suspicious, considering that:

Here is a transcript of that exchange:

FRANKEN: And I want to thank General Clapper and – and Attorney General Yates for – for appearing today. We have – the intelligence communities have concluded all 17 of them that Russia interfered with this election. And we all know how that’s right.

CLAPPER: Senator, as I pointed out in my statement Senator Franken, it was there were only three agencies that directly involved in this assessment plus my office…

FRANKEN: But all 17 signed on to that?

CLAPPER: Well, we didn’t go through that – that process, this was a special situation because of the time limits and my – what I knew to be to who could really contribute to this and the sensitivity of the situation, we decided it was a constant judgment to restrict it to those three. I’m not aware of anyone who dissented or – or disagreed when it came out.

The January 6 U.S. intelligence community report is titled, “Background to ‘Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections’: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution.”

Full transcript: Sally Yates and James Clapper testify on Russian election interference
Washington Post Staff May 8 2017
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...per-testify-on-russian-election-interference/
Click to expand...

It is further complicated by the fact that that the DNC did not allow the FBI to do a forensic examination of their servers. One has to ask, why not? What are they hiding?

FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself: report | TheHill

FBI says DNC rebuffed request to examine computer servers ...

So really, which agencies endorsed / supporting this assessment that the Russians hacked the DNC, and who were their politically appointed leaders at the time that this was done?

Also given the release of the WikiLeaks release of the CIA exploit code, which could make any breech appear to be any desired nation:
Wikileaks Unveils 'Vault 7': "The Largest Ever Publication Of ...

And then the suspected DNC release being an insider of the DNC, specifically Seth Rich.

I'm left with the conclusion that the Russians didn't do the DNC hack. There's just too many things that lean more so to it being a DNC insider (DNC not allowing FBI forensics for example), than things leaning to make it a Russian hack.
 
katzgar said:
I never said you said it it's just so freaking obvious that's all. And yes if you don't think the crap against Obama was comprable to what's being dumped on Trump now you're just aren't being honest
Click to expand...
You're delusional. Nobody went after Obama for treason. Nobody criticized Obama for not visiting countries "in alphabetical order." Nobody went after Michelle Obama (until she started ruining public schools' lunch programs). We didn't have crackpots firing off dozens of hateful OP's every single day as you see nowadays.

Yes, there were a lot of people who weren't happy with Obama, but the witch hunt against Trump is overwhelming.
 
Velvet Elvis said:
You're delusional. Nobody went after Obama for treason. Nobody criticized Obama for not visiting countries "in alphabetical order." Nobody went after Michelle Obama (until she started ruining public schools' lunch programs). We didn't have crackpots firing off dozens of hateful OP's every single day as you see nowadays.

Yes, there were a lot of people who weren't happy with Obama, but the witch hunt against Trump is overwhelming.
Click to expand...


Your post is one of the most dishonest ever on these forums
 
Keep telling yourself that while counting worms in that hole your head is in.
 
Desert Storm said:
I never said that.

But the Left's whining has become so much worse than what the Righties ever put out, its not even comparable!!
Click to expand...

I said the same thing over a year ago. It's bonkers.
 
Velvet Elvis said:
Yes, there were a lot of people who weren't happy with Obama, but the witch hunt against Trump is overwhelming.
Click to expand...

Trump is overwhelmingly deserving of it, is the issue.

Obama was nicknamed no-drama-Obama. are you thinking that no-drama style JUST MIGHT have been a label based on...not being dramatic? Just a guess, just a guess, don't hold me to that.

Didn't Trump run a campaign specifically ON being dramatic? On being anti-establishment of BOTH political parties? On being nationalist, and thus anti-everyone but Russia (with love), especially anti-NATO, europe, muslim, islam, non-traditional women or ugly women or heavy women, minorities, etc? Didn't his chief political strategist, ****ing BANNON, intentionally want to destabilize the nation?

Trump ran on dismantling the government of the United States, and saying whatever popped into his ignorant head via tweeting. Did you think that wouldn't be ****ing news worthy? Good gods.
 
Trump turned the presidential campaign into a media circus, now that he is president his administration has become an even bigger circus.
 
Trump loves this kind of circus. He prides himself on his ability to "insight a riot" in the folks who support him and laughs at his ability to "play" them.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
Then why does no one in the trump administration want to reveal to the public what was the reason for contacting russia.

Why hold the meetings off the record?
Click to expand...

Maybe for the same reason that no administration in history has ever revealed to the public the reason for all their meetings or held all their meetings on the record.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Aberration said:
Maybe for the same reason that no administration in history has ever revealed to the public the reason for all their meetings or held all their meetings on the record.
Click to expand...

Exactly. If you think Obama never had back-office or under-the-table talks and deals with other world leaders, then you're a bigger sucker than anyone ever thought.
 
I constantly defended CNN, rightly, during the election for their fairly balanced coverage of the election. They had a very fair representation between various political entities. Since the election, CNN has definitely been much harder on Trump, but I'm not sure if it's due to the political leanings of their hosts (a possibility), the fact Trump has actively sought to undermine the TV station which essentially provided him the platform to his successful presidential campaign (very possible), or because it's best for ratings (most likely).

CNN was very fair during the election season. Since the election, they have been decidedly more one sided against Trump.

Also note, I'm VERY careful to say against Trump, not Republicans. They went really hard after the Montana congressman, but other than that, they've been fairly neutral to other Republican leaders.
Velvet Elvis said:
Nobody went after Obama for treason.
Click to expand...
Do you have evidence Obama's campaign had contacts with a foreign power which actively worked to influence an election in his favor?

Nobody criticized Obama for not visiting countries "in alphabetical order."
Click to expand...
Nobody has done that to Trump. :shrug:

And don't cite Pelosi, because she didn't criticize Trump for not visiting in alphabetical order, that was just stupid propaganda put out by right wing news sites.

Nobody went after Michelle Obama
Click to expand...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :lol:

Your memory doesn't seem to be too good.
We didn't have crackpots firing off dozens of hateful OP's every single day as you see nowadays.
Click to expand...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :lol:

Your memory doesn't seem to be too good.

Yes, there were a lot of people who weren't happy with Obama, but the witch hunt against Trump is overwhelming.
Click to expand...
Where is Trump's birth certificate, pray tell? And at which mosque does he pray?
 
Desert Storm said:
I can't take it anymore CNN. Enough is enough!!

Can this channel not wake up to the fact they are 95% anti-Trump, masquerading as a legit news channel???!!!

At least be honest and say you dont like Trump........DUH!!
Click to expand...

CNN are fully immersed in Baghdad Bob level absurdity.
 
Slyfox696 said:
I constantly defended CNN, rightly, during the election for their fairly balanced coverage of the election. They had a very fair representation between various political entities. Since the election, CNN has definitely been much harder on Trump, but I'm not sure if it's due to the political leanings of their hosts (a possibility), the fact Trump has actively sought to undermine the TV station which essentially provided him the platform to his successful presidential campaign (very possible), or because it's best for ratings (most likely)
Click to expand...
Probably a combination of all 3, with higher ratings being the predominant factor
 
Desert Storm said:
I can't take it anymore CNN. Enough is enough!!

Can this channel not wake up to the fact they are 95% anti-Trump, masquerading as a legit news channel???!!!

At least be honest and say you dont like Trump........DUH!!
Click to expand...

Stop watching it. Nobody is forcing you to subject yourself to it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom