• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jihadist for White Hate

I will bet that there are many conservative that would have reacted if they had time to intervene. I would assume the same from the left.

You can be a real troll some times Calamity.

If this earns me another gig.................so be it. You are ****ing childish.
 
I will bet that there are many conservative that would have reacted if they had time to intervene. I would assume the same from the left.

You can be a real troll some times Calamity.

If this earns me another gig.................so be it. You are ****ing childish.
:applaud AMEN a big partisan hack.
 
LOL, Dallas sniper, wanted to kill white cops, nice, dishonest attempt, but a fail none the less.

Yeah that's not a position that BLM rhetoric supports.

Your argument is failing miserably in like three different ways.
 
Must be a very crappy crop since I'd imagine that there'd be a lot more of these types of attacks, if it was actually a thing, going off of demographics. I mean, jihadi terrorists have killed more U.S. citizens in terrorist attacks than any other group since 9/11 and Muslims only make up .6% of the population.

Those right winger boogie men you're creating just doesn't seem to pan out.
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-false-claim-foreign-born-domestic-attacks-54e99b0e11b6

But more importantly, foreigners pose less of a threat to Americans than right-wing extremists on domestic soil. In a 2015 New York Times article, University of North Carolina Professor Charles Kurzman and Duke Professor David Schanzer found that Islam-inspired terror attacks accounted for 50 deaths since 9/11, but that “right-wing extremists averaged 337 attacks per year in the decade after 9/11, causing a total of 254 fatalities.”
 

Your information is out of date.

Here is a NYT article (no need to go to the trash thinkprogress not that the NYT is much better)

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/...llenges-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html

And the link provided in their own article.

https://www.newamerica.org/in-depth/terrorism-in-america/part-i-overview-terrorism-cases-2001-today/

So, again, you have Muslims, who make up .6% of the population being the demographic that has killed the most number of people in terrorist attacks since 9/11. Do you understand statistics well enough to know what a .6% of the population means?

Conversely, those who identify as conservative make up 38% of the population. That's thousands of % higher than the number of Muslims. In other words, if 38% of the population was actually some kind of real threat, like you're desperately trying to push, then there'd be a helluva lot more attacks and people would be getting killed all over. But no, that's not the reality of the matter. The reality is that there are some mentally unstable people, most of the time they have already been identified such, and are are medications.

U.S. Liberals at Record 24%, but Still Trail Conservatives | Gallup

Ciao.
 
Your information is out of date.

Here is a NYT article (no need to go to the trash thinkprogress not that the NYT is much better)

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/...llenges-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html

And the link provided in their own article.

https://www.newamerica.org/in-depth/terrorism-in-america/part-i-overview-terrorism-cases-2001-today/

So, again, you have Muslims, who make up .6% of the population being the demographic that has killed the most number of people in terrorist attacks since 9/11. Do you understand statistics well enough to know what a .6% of the population means?

Conversely, those who identify as conservative make up 38% of the population. That's thousands of % higher than the number of Muslims. In other words, if 38% of the population was actually some kind of real threat, like you're desperately trying to push, then there'd be a helluva lot more attacks and people would be getting killed all over. But no, that's not the reality of the matter. The reality is that there are some mentally unstable people, most of the time they have already been identified such, and are are medications.

U.S. Liberals at Record 24%, but Still Trail Conservatives | Gallup

Ciao.

Given enough time and enough fertilizer....
 
Given enough time and enough fertilizer....

Lol...Oh kay. Looking at trends we are much more likely to have a significant left-wing problem developing.
 

Hmmm.
1. This is just an opinion piece. There are no ststs or facts supporting the authors assertions which is ironic since that is the charge he's making.
2. Roof specifically claimed blacks are raping white women. Not black teens are assaulting non blacks.

You made a claim insinuating that Roofs beliefs on rape where derived from some specific set of sources. From your link, you appear to be insinuating such a belief is from mainstream media source, probably from some conservative. Again, support or retract this claim.

Also, please refrain from starting a link war. It is bad form.
 
Hmmm.
1. This is just an opinion piece. There are no ststs or facts supporting the authors assertions which is ironic since that is the charge he's making.
2. Roof specifically claimed blacks are raping white women. Not black teens are assaulting non blacks.

You made a claim insinuating that Roofs beliefs on rape where derived from some specific set of sources. From your link, you appear to be insinuating such a belief is from mainstream media source, probably from some conservative. Again, support or retract this claim.

Also, please refrain from starting a link war. It is bad form.
:roll:

...Roof’s online searches quickly took him to one place that proved to be a lynchpin in his own developing views –– the website of the Council of Conservative Citizens, which grew out of a 1950s-era organization that fought school desegregation...

“At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on white murders got ignored?” he wrote.
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch...and-radicalized-online-look-trial-dylann-roof
He sounds just like some of the Right Wingers we see arguing the same points here.
 
Last edited:
:roll:


He sounds just like some of the Right Wingers we see arguing the same points here.

Ok, since you couldn't link a mainstream news source with his comment on rape, it was time to go digging... and then you stumble upon this. The Council of Conservative Citizens, a group I've never heard of and that most Americans probably aren't familiar with is your key evidence to support that his message was common among conservatives. Because the word conservative is in the title???

So, jumping to the next stone, please show me the mainstream media source or personality who posited this viewpoint
"How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on white murders got ignored?”
which you claim sounds just like some right wingers on this website. Which, of course, begs the question, is this a view among a small group here on this website who claim to identify as right wing, or is it actually a common viewpoint among conservatives?
 
Ok, since you couldn't link a mainstream news source with his comment on rape, it was time to go digging... and then you stumble upon this. The Council of Conservative Citizens, a group I've never heard of and that most Americans probably aren't familiar with is your key evidence to support that his message was common among conservatives. Because the word conservative is in the title???

So, jumping to the next stone, please show me the mainstream media source or personality who posited this viewpoint
"How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on white murders got ignored?”
which you claim sounds just like some right wingers on this website. Which, of course, begs the question, is this a view among a small group here on this website who claim to identify as right wing, or is it actually a common viewpoint among conservatives?
I choose B.
 
Back
Top Bottom