Your information is out of date.
Here is a NYT article (no need to go to the trash thinkprogress not that the NYT is much better)
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/...llenges-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html
And the link provided in their own article.
https://www.newamerica.org/in-depth/terrorism-in-america/part-i-overview-terrorism-cases-2001-today/
So, again, you have Muslims, who make up .6% of the population being the demographic that has killed the most number of people in terrorist attacks since 9/11. Do you understand statistics well enough to know what a .6% of the population means?
Conversely, those who identify as conservative make up 38% of the population. That's thousands of % higher than the number of Muslims. In other words, if 38% of the population was actually some kind of real threat, like you're desperately trying to push, then there'd be a helluva lot more attacks and people would be getting killed all over. But no, that's not the reality of the matter. The reality is that there are some mentally unstable people, most of the time they have already been identified such, and are are medications.
U.S. Liberals at Record 24%, but Still Trail Conservatives | Gallup
Ciao.